The movement derivation of conditional clauses

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 595-621

  Haegeman, Liliane ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cartography; Conditional clauses; Intervention; Irrealis operator; Modality

Indexed keywords

EID: 78449312639     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/LING_a_00014     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2009. You have the right to remain silent: The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of Brussels.
2. Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2010. The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Agouraki, Yoria. 1999. Propositional operators. In Studies in Greek syntax, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Geoffrey Horrocks, and Melita Stavrou, 23-44. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Alexiadou, Artemis. 1997. Adverb placement: A study in antisymmetric syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5. Arsenijević, Boban. 2009. Correlatives as types of conditional. In Lipták 2009a, 131-156.
6. Baltin, Mark. 2007. Deletion vs. proforms: A false dichotomy. Ms., New York University.
7. Barbiers, Sjef. 2006. The syntax of modal auxiliaries. In Everaert and Van Riemsdijk 2006, V:1-22.
8. Barbiers, Sjef. 2007. On the periphery of imperative and declarative clauses in Dutch and German. In Imperative clauses in generative grammar, ed. by Wim van der Wurff, 95-112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9. Bayer, Josef. 2001. Asymmetry in emphatic topicalization. In Audiatur vox sapientiae, ed. by Caroline Féry and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 15-47. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
10. Belletti, Adriana, ed. 2004. The cartography of syntactic structures. Vol. 3, Structures and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Beninca, Paola. 2001. The position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In Cinque and Salvi 2001, 39-64.
12. Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Pancheva. 2002. A cross-constructional analysis of if clauses. Paper presented at the seminar "Interface in the CP Domain," Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, 9 March.
13. Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Pancheva. 2006. Conditionals. In Everaert and Van Riemsdijk 2006, I:638-687.
14. Bocci, Giuliano. 2007. Criterial positions and left periphery in Italian: Evidence for the syntactic encoding of contrastive focus. Nanzan Linguistics 1(3):35-70.
15. Boogaart, Ronny. 2007. Conditionele constructies met moest(en) en mocht(en) in Belgisch-Nederlands en Nederlands-Nederlands. Neerlandistiek.nl 07.05. Available at http://www.neerlandistiek.nl.
16. Bouma, Gosse, Robert Malouf, and Ivan Sag. 2001. Satisfying constraints on extraction and adjunction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19:1-65.
17. Browning, M. A. 1996. CP recursion and that-t effects. Linguistic Inquiry 27:237-256.
18. Cardinaletti, Anna. 2008. On a (wh-) moved Topic in Italian, compared to Germanic. Paper presented at the Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop, Stuttgart.
19. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of Ādependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. "Restructuring" and functional structure. In Belletti 2004, 132-191.
22. Cinque, Guglielmo, and Luigi Rizzi. 2010. The cartography of syntactic structures. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, ed. by Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog, 51-65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Cinque, Guglielmo, and Giampaolo Salvi, eds. 2001. Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
24. Citko, Barbara. 2000. On the syntax and semantics of Polish adjunct clauses. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8:1-38.
25. Cruschina, Silvio. 2010. Syntactic extraposition and clitic resumption in Italian. Lingua 120:50-73.
26. Culicover, Peter W., and Robert D. Levine. 2001. Stylistic inversion in English: A reconsideration. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19:283-310.
27. Davies, Eirian C. 1967. Some notes on English clause types. Transactions of the Philological Society 65: 1-31.
28. Declerck, Renaat. 1997. When-clauses and temporal structure. London: Routledge.
29. Declerck, Renaat, and Ilse Depraetere. 1995. The double system of tense forms referring to future time in English. Journal of Semantics 12:269-310.
30. Declerck, Renaat, and Susan Reed. 2001. Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
31. Delfitto, Denis. 2002. On the semantics of pronominal clitics and some of its consequences. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1:41-69.
32. Demirdache, Hamida, and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2004. The syntax of time adverbs. In The syntax of time, ed. by Jacqueline Guéron and Jacqueline Lecarme, 143-180. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Dikken, Marcel den. 2006. Either float and the syntax of co-or-dination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24:689-749.
34. Dubinsky, Stanley, and Kemp Williams. 1995. Recategorization of prepositions as complementizers: The case of temporal prepositions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 26:125-137.
35. Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.
36. Emonds, Joseph. 2004. Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In Peripheries, ed. by David Adger, Cécile De Cat, and George Tsoulas, 75-121. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
37. Enç, Mürvet. 1987. Anchoring conditions for tense. Linguistic Inquiry 18:633-657.
38. Ernst, Thomas. 2007. On the role of semantics in a theory of adverb syntax. Lingua 117:1008-1033.
39. Ernst, Thomas. 2009. Speaker-oriented adverbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27:497-544.
40. Everaert, Martin, and Henk van Riemsdijk, eds. 2006. The Blackwell companion to syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti, and Luigi Rizzi. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119:67-88.
42. Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2001. On the force of V2 declaratives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 23:103-109.
43. Garzonio, Jacopo. 2008. Dislocazioni a sinistra e clitici di ripresa obbligatori. Annali Online di Ferrara 2: 1-19. Available at http://annali.unife.it/lettere/2008vol2/garzonio.pdf.
44. Geis, Michael. 1970. Adverbial subordinate clauses in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
45. Geis, Michael. 1975. English time and place adverbials. In Working papers in linguistics 18, ed. by Michael Geis et al., 1-11. Columbus: The Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.
46. Geis, Michael. 1985. The syntax of conditional sentences. In Studies in generalized phrase structure grammar, ed. by Michael Geis, 130-159. Columbus: The Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.
47. Green, Georgia. 1976. Main clause phenomena in subordinate clauses. Language 52:382-397.
48. Haddican, Bill. 2007. The structural deficiency of verbal pro-forms. Linguistic Inquiry 38:539-547.
49. Haegeman, Liliane. 2003a. Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18: 317-339.
50. Haegeman, Liliane. 2003b. Notes on long adverbial fronting in English and the left periphery. Linguistic Inquiry 34:640-649.
51. Haegeman, Liliane. 2006a. Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD and the left periphery. In Negation, tense and clausal architecture: Cross-linguistic investigations, ed. by Raffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger, and Paul Portner, 27-52. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
52. Haegeman, Liliane. 2006b. Clitic climbing and the dual status of sembrare. Linguistic Inquiry 37:484-501.
53. Haegeman, Liliane. 2006c. Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116:1651-1669.
54. Haegeman, Liliane. 2007. Operator movement and topicalization in adverbial clauses. Folia Linguistica 18: 485-502.
55. Haegeman, Liliane. 2008. The cartography of discourse markers in West Flemish. Paper presented at the Particle Workshop, Cambridge, UK, 30-31 October. (To appear in Cambridge occasional papers in linguistics.)
56. Haegeman, Liliane. 2009. The movement analysis of temporal adverbial clauses. English Language and Linguistics 13:385-408.
57. Haegeman, Liliane. 2010. Internal syntax of adverbial clauses. In Exploring the left periphery, ed. By Kleanthes Grohmann and Ianthi-Maria Tsimpli, thematic issue, Lingua 120:628-648.
58. Haegeman, Liliane. To appear. Evidential mood, restructuring, and the status of sembrare. In The cartography of syntactic structures. Vol. 5, Mapping the left periphery, ed. by Paola Beninca and Nicola Munaro. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Haegeman, Liliane, and Henk van Riemsdijk. 1986. Verb projection raising, scope, and the typology of rules affecting verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 17:417-466.
60. Heycock, Caroline. 2006. Embedded root phenomena. In Everaert and Van Riemsdijk 2006, II:174-209.
61. Hill, Virginia. 2006. Stylistic inversion in Romanian. Studia Linguistica 60:156-180.
62. Hill, Virginia. 2007a. Romanian adverbs and the pragmatic field. The Linguistic Review 24:61-86.
63. Hill, Virginia. 2007b. Vocatives and the pragmatics-syntax interface. Lingua 117:2077-2105.
64. Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2009. A phase-based comparative approach to modification and word order in Germanic. Syntax 12:242-284.
65. Hooper, Joan, and Sandra Thompson. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4:465-497.
66. Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn. 2008. Liberalizing modals and floating clause boundaries. Ms., University of Tromsø. Available at http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000782.
67. Hukari, Thomas E., and Robert D. Levine. 1995. Adjunct extraction. Journal of Linguistics 31:195-226.
68. Ingham, Richard. 2008. Negative co-ordination in Middle English. Paper presented at the conference "Continuity and Change in Grammar." University of Cambridge, 18-20 March.
69. Johnson, Kyle. 1988. Clausal gerunds, the ECP, and government. Linguistic Inquiry 19:583-609.
70. Kayne, Richard, and Jean-Yves Pollock. 2001. New thoughts on stylistic inversion. In Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of Universal Grammar, ed. by Aafke Hulk and Jean-Yves Pollock, 107-162. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Komagata, Nobo. 2003. Information structure in subordinate and subordinate-like clauses. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12:301-318.
72. Koster, Jan. 1978. Locality principles in syntax. Foris: Dordrecht.
73. Laenzlinger, Christopher. 1996. Adverb syntax and phrase structure. In Configurations: Essays on structure and interpretation, ed. by Anna-Maria Di Sciullo, 99-128. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
74. Lahousse, Karen. 2003. The distribution of postverbal nominal subjects in French: A syntactic, semantic and pragmatic analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Louvain, Belgium.
75. Lahousse, Karen. To appear. Information structure and epistemic modality. Studies in Language.
76. Larson, Richard. 1985. On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 217-264.
77. Larson, Richard. 1987. "Missing prepositions" and the analysis of English free relative clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 18:239-266.
78. Larson, Richard. 1990. Extraction and multiple selection in PP. The Linguistic Review 7:169-182.
79. Lecarme, Jacqueline. 2008. Tense and modality in nominals. In Time and modality, ed. by Jacqueline Guéron and Jacqueline Lecarme, 195-225. Heidelberg: Springer.
80. Lindstad, Arne Martinus. 2007. Analyses of negation: Structure and interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo.
81. Lipták, Anikó. 2005. Relativization strategies in temporal adjunct clauses. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5:133-185.
82. Lipták, Anikó, ed. 2009a. Correlatives cross-linguistically. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
83. Lipták, Anikó. 2009b. The landscape of correlatives: An empirical and analytical survey. In Lipták 2009a, 1-50.
84. Maki, Hideki, Lizanne Kaiser, and Masao Ochi. 1999. Embedded topicalization in English and Japanese. Lingua 109:1-14.
85. McDowell, Joyce. 1987. Assertion and modality. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
86. Migdalski, Krzysztof. 2006. The syntax of compound tenses in Slavic. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).
87. Migdalski, Krzysztof. 2010. On the relation between V2 and the second position cliticization. Lingua 120: 329-353.
88. Nilsen, Øystein. 2004. Domains for adverbs. In Adverbs across frameworks, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, thematic issue, Lingua 114:809-847.
89. Palmer, Frank R. 1990. Modality and English modals. London: Longman.
90. Postal, Paul M., and John Robert Ross. 1970. A problem of adverb preposing. Linguistic Inquiry 1:145-146.
91. Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
93. Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position "Int(errogative)" in the left periphery of the clause. In Cinque and Salvi 2001, 287-296.
94. Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Belletti 2004, 223-251.
95. Rizzi, Luigi, and Ur Shlonsky. 2006. Satisfying the Subject Criterion by a nonsubject: English locative inversion and heavy NP shift. In Phases of interpretation, ed. by Mara Frascarelli, 341-362. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
96. Roberts, Ian, and Anna Roussou. 2002. The Extended Projection Principle as a condition on the tense dependency. In Subjects, expletives, and the EPP, ed. by Peter Svenonius, 125-155. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
97. Schachter, Paul. 1992. Comments on Bresnan and Kanerva's "Locative Inversion in Chicheŵ a: A case study of factorization in grammar." In Syntax and the lexicon, ed. by Tim Stowell and Eric Wehrli. Syntax and Semantics 26. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
98. Starke, Michal. 2001. Move dissolves into Merge: A theory of locality. Doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva. http://theoling.auf.net/papers/starke_michal/.
99. Tenny, Carol. 2000. Core events and adverbial modification. In Events as grammatical objects, ed. by Carol Tenny and James Pustejovsky, 285-334. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
100. Tomaszewicz, Barbara. 2009. Subjunctive mood in Polish. In Studies in formal Slavic phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics and information structure: Proceedings of FDSL 7, Leipzig 2007 (_Linguistik International; 21), ed. by Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertová, and Petr Biskup, 221-234. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
101. Whitman, John. 1989. Topic, modality, and IP structure. In Proceedings of the Third Harvard Workshop on Korean Linguistics, ed. by Susumu Kuno et al., 341-356. Seoul: Hanshin.
102. Willmott, Jo. 2007. On mapping the modality of conditional sentences. Paper presented at the 18th International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki/ School of English, Thessaloniki, 4-7 May.