Zooming in on microscopic flow by remotely detected MRI

Science

Volumn 330, Issue 6007, 2010, Pages 1078-1081

  Bajaj, Vikram S ^b   Paulsen, Jeffrey ^b   Harel, Elad ^a   Pines, Alexander ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSAY; FLUID FLOW; HARDWARE; MICROSCOPY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; OPTICAL PROPERTY; PIXEL; REMOTE SENSING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL; VELOCITY; VOLUME;

ARTICLE; CHANNEL GATING; FLOW MEASUREMENT; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MICROFLUIDICS;

EID: 78449312025     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1192313     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. D. L. Olson, T. L. Peck, A. G. Webb, R. L. Magin, J. V. Sweedler, Science 270, 1967 (1995).
2. Y. Maguire, I. L. Chuang, S. G. Zhang, N. Gershenfeld, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 9198 (2007).
3. C. Massin et al., J. Magn. Reson. 164, 242 (2003).
4. H. Wensink et al., Lab Chip 5, 280 (2005).
5. H. Lee, E. Sun, D. Ham, R. Weissleder, Nat. Med. 14, 869 (2008).
6. Y.-Q. Song, H. Cho, T. Hopper, A. E. Pomerantz, P. Z. Sun, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 052212 (2008).
7. A. J. Moulé et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 9122 (2003).
8. J. Jeener, B. H. Meier, P. Bachmann, R. R. Ernst, J. Chem. Phys. 71, 4546 (1979).
9. C. Hilty et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 14960 (2005).
10. J. Granwehr et al., Magn. Reson. Imaging 25, 449 (2007).
11. E. Harel, A. Pines, J. Magn. Reson. 193, 199 (2008).
12. E. Fukushima, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31, 95 (1999).
13. P. T. Callaghan, Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy (Clarendon, Oxford, 1991).
14. D. G. Cory, A. N. Garroway, Magn. Reson. Med. 14, 435 (1990).
15. M. Lustig, D. Donoho, J. M. Pauly, Magn. Reson. Med. 58, 1182 (2007).
16. D. L. Donoho, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52, 1289 (2006).
17. See supporting material on Science Online.
18. J. M. Pope, S. Yao, Concepts Magn. Reson. 5, 281 (1993).
19. G. M. Whitesides, Nature 442, 368 (2006).
20. H. Wu, A. Wheeler, R. N. Zare, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 12809 (2004).
21. C. Monat, P. Domachuk, B. J. Eggleton, Nat. Photonics 1, 106 (2007).
22. S. Koster, E. Verpoorte, Lab Chip 7, 1394 (2007).
23. A. J. deMello, Nature 442, 394 (2006).
24. A. M. Wolters, D. A. Jayawickrama, J. V. Sweedler, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6, 711 (2002).
25. L. Schröder, T. J. Lowery, C. Hilty, D. E. Wemmer, A. Pines, Science 314, 446 (2006).
26. M. P. Ledbetter et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 2286 (2008).
27. J. M. Taylor et al., Nat. Phys. 4, 810 (2008).
28. P. Yager et al., Nature 442, 412 (2006).
29. We thank D.Wemmer for his careful reading of the manuscript and L.-S. Bouchard for helpful discussions. Supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering under contract DE-AC02-05CH11231 (V.S.B., J.P., E.H., A.P.). We thank the Agilent Foundation for its generous and unrestricted gift. The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has applied for a patent on aspects of this method. The authors declare no competing interests. Author contributions: V.S.B., J.P., E.H., and A.P. designed the experiments. V.S.B., J.P., and E.H. performed the experiments. V.S.B. and J.P. analyzed the data and wrote the paper.