Positive assortment for peer review

Adaptive Behavior

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 448-450

  Aktipis, C Athena ^a   Thompson Schill, Sharon L ^b  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

assortative reviewing; cooperation; public goods; Social dilemma

Indexed keywords

EID: 78449283207     PISSN: 10597123     EISSN: 17412633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1059712310384281     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Aktipis, C.A. (2008). When to walk away and when to stay: Cooperation evolves when agents can leave unproductive partners and groups. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Hamilton, W.D. (1964a). The genetical evolution of social behavior I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-16.
3. Hamilton, W.D. (1964b). The genetical evolution of social behavior II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 17-52.
4. Hamilton, W.D. (1970). Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature, 228(5277), 1218-1220 (doi: 10.1038/2281218a0).
5. Hamilton, W.D. (1972). Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 3(1), 193-232.
6. Hauser, M., & Fehr, E. (2007). An incentive solution to the peer review problem. PLoS Biology, 5(4), e107doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050107).
7. Hochberg, M.E., Chase, J.M., Gotelli, N.J., Hastings, A., & Naeem, S. (2009). The tragedy of the reviewer commons. Ecology Letters, 12(1), 2-4 (doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01276.x).
8. Maynard Smith, J. (1964). Group selection and kin selection. Nature, 201, 1145-1147.
9. Pepper, J. (2007). Simple models of assortment through environmental feedback. Artificial Life, 13(1), 1-9.
10. Pepper, J.W., & Smuts, B.B. (2002). Assortment through environmental feedback. The American Naturalist, 160(2), 205-213.