Sovereignty's Blight: Why Contemporary Public Law Needs the Concept of 'Due Deference

Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 337-370

  Hunt, Murray ^a  

^a Matrix Chambers   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78449274933     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Paul Craig, 'The Courts, the Human Rights Act and Judicial Review' (2001) 117 LQR 589
2. Mark Elliott, 'The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Standard of Substantive Review' (2001) 60 CLJ 301
3. Ian Leigh, 'Taking Rights Proportionately: Judicial Review, the Human Rights Act and Strasbourg' [2002] PL 265
4. Richard Clayton, 'Regaining a Sense of Proportion: The Human Rights Act and the Proportionality Principle' [2001] EHRLR 504.
5. Tim Owen, 'Assessment of Fact, Due Deference and the Wider Impact of the Human Rights Act in Administrative Law' in J Jowell and J Cooper, JUSTICE/UCL Seminars (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2003).
6. Michael Fordham and Tom de la Mare, 'Identifying the Principles of Proportionality' in J Jowell and J Cooper, Understanding Human Rights Principles (Hart Publishing, 2001), 77-89
7. David Feldman, 'Proportionality and the Human Rights Act 1998' in Evelyn Ellis (ed), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Hart Publishing, 2000)
8. Garreth Wong, 'Towards the Nutcracker Principle: Reconsidering the Objections to Proportionality' [2000] PL 92.
9. D Dyzenhaus, 'Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik's Conception of Legal Culture' (1998) 14 SAJHR 11
10. J Jowell, 'Beyond the Rule of Law: Towards Constitutional Judicial Review' [2000] PL 672.
11. Lord Bingham, 'The Evolving Constitution' [2002] EHRLR 1.
12. D Dyzenhaus, (1998) 14 SAJHR 11 at 24-25
13. J Jowell, 'Due Deference under the Human Rights Act' in Jowell and Cooper, above n 2.
14. K Ewing, 'The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy' [1999] MLR 79
15. JAG Griffith, 'The Common Law and the Political Constitution' [2001] LQR 43.
16. R Singh, M Hunt and M Demetriou, 'Is there a Role for the "Margin of Appreciation" in National Law after the Human Rights Act?' [1999] EHRLR 15
17. D Pannick, 'The Discretionary Area of Judgment' [1998] PL 545
18. A Lester and D Pannick, Human Rights Law and Practice (Butterworths, 1999), para 3.2.1.
19. Simon Brown LJ in Porter v South Bucks District Council [2002] 1 All ER 425 at 438-39, paras 25—27.
20. David Dyzenhaus in 'The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy' in Michael Taggart (ed), The Province of Administrative Law (Hart Publishing, 1997), ch 13.
21. P Mahoney, 'Marvellous Richness of Diversity or Invidious Cultural Relativism?' (1998) 19 Human Rights Law Journal 1
22. Y Arai, "The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Jurisprudence of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights' (1998) 16 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 41.
23. Lord Lester, 'The European Convention on Human Rights in the New Architecture of Europe: General Report," Proceedings of the 8th International Colloquy on the European Convention on Human Rights (Council of Europe, 1995), 227, 236-37.
24. J Macdonald, "The Margin of Appreciation' in R St J Macdonald, F Matscher and H Petzold, The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff, 1994), 83-124.
25. J Jowell, 'Due Deference under the Human Rights Act' in Jowell and Cooper, above n 2.
26. D Dyzenhaus, 'Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik's Conception of Legal Culture' (1998) 14 SAJHR 11.
27. D Dyzenhaus, "The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy' in M Taggart (ed), The Province of Administrative Law (Hart Publishing, 1997), ch 13, 286.
28. Nick Blake, 'Importing Proportionality: Clarification or Confusion' [2002] EHRLR 19, 26.