Preoperative nomograms for predicting extracapsular extension in korean men with localized prostate cancer: A multi-institutional clinicopathologic study

Journal of Korean Medical Science

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1443-1448

  Chung, Jae Seung ^a   Choi, Han Yong ^b   Song, Hae Ryoung ^c   Byun, Seok Soo ^d   Seo, Seongil ^b   Song, Cheryn ^e   Cho, Jin Seon ^f   Lee, Sang Eun ^d   Ahn, Hanjong ^e   Lee, Eun Sik ^g   Kim, Won Jae ^h   Chung, Moon Kee ⁱ   Jung, Tae Young ^j   Yu, Ho Song ^k   Choi, Young Deuk ^k  

^a Inje University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

^e University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^f Hallym University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^g Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^h Chungbuk National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

ⁱ Pusan National University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^j Seoul Veterans Hospital   (South Korea)

^k Yonsei University   (South Korea)

more..

Author keywords

Nomograms; Patient selection; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NOMOGRAM; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; SOUTH KOREA; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOMOGRAMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPUBLIC OF KOREA;

EID: 78449273897     PISSN: 10118934     EISSN: 15986357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.10.1443     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 1983; 4: 473-85.
2. Goharderakhshan RZ, Sudilovsky D, Carroll LA, Grossfeld GD, Marn R, Carroll PR. Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy. Urology 2002; 59: 709-14.
3. Hernandez DJ, Epstein JI, Trock BJ, Tsuzuki T, Carter HB, Walsh PC. Radical retropubic prostatectomy. How often do experienced surgeons have positive surgical margins when there is extraprostatic extension in the region of the neurovascular bundle? J Urol 2005; 173: 446-9.
4. Tsuzuki T, Hernandez DJ, Aydin H, Trock B, Walsh PC, Epstein JI. Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. J Urol 2005; 173: 450-3.
5. Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Stapleton AM, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 766-71.
6. Taneja SS, Penson DF, Epelbaum A, Handler T, Lepor H. Does site specific labeling of sextant biopsy cores predict the site of extracapsular extension in radical prostatectomy surgical specimen. J Urol 1999; 162: 1352-7.
7. Graefen M, Haese A, Pichlmeier U, Hammerer PG, Noldus J, Butz K, Erbersdobler A, Henke RP, Michl U, Fernandez S, Huland H. A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: a tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2001; 165: 857-63.
8. Wu AH, Whittemore AS, Kolonel LN, John EM, Gallagher RP, West DW, Hankin J, Teh CZ, Dreon DM, Pafenbarger RS Jr. Serum androgens and sex hormone-binding globulins in relation to lifestyle factors in older African-American, white, and Asian men in the United States and Canada. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1995; 4: 735-41.
9. Lee SE, Kwak C, Park MS, Lee CH, Kang W, Oh SJ. Ethnic differences in the age-related distribution of serum prostate-specific antigen values: a study in a healthy Korean male population. Urology 2000; 56: 1007-10.
10. Robbins AS, Koppie TM, Gomez SL, Parikh-Patel A, Mills PK. Differences in prognostic factors and survival among white and Asian men with prostate cancer, California, 1995-2004. Cancer 2007; 110: 1255-63.
11. Song C, Kang T, Ro JY, Lee MS, Kim CS, Ahn H. Nomograms for the prediction of pathologic stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men. J Korean Med Sci 2005; 20: 262-6.
12. Jung KW, Won YJ, Park S, Kong HJ, Sung J, Shin HR, Park EC, Lee JS. Cancer statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality and Survival in 2005. J Korean Med Sci 2009; 24: 995-1003.
13. Ku JH, Ahn JO, Lee CH, Lee NK, Park YH, Byun SS, Kwak C, Lee SE. Distribution of serum prostate-specific antigen in healthy Korean men: influence of ethnicity. Urology 2002; 60: 475-9.
14. Chang YL, Lin AT, Chen KK, Chang YH, Wu HH, Kuo JY, Huang WJ, Lu SH, Hsu YS, Chung HJ, Chang SC. Correlation between serum prostate specific antigen and prostate volume in Taiwanese men with biopsy proven benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2006; 176: 196-9.
15. Gupta A, Aragaki C, Gotoh M, Masumori N, Ohshima S, Tsukamoto T, Roehrborn CG. Relationship between prostate specific antigen and indexes of prostate volume in Japanese men. J Urol 2005; 173: 503-6.
16. Ohori M, Kattan MW, Koh H, Maru N, Slawin KM, Shariat S, Muramoto M, Reuter VE, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: a nomogram for staging prostate cancer. J Urol 2004; 171: 1844-9.
17. Naya Y, Slaton JW, Troncoso P, Okihara K, Babaian RJ. Tumor length and location of cancer on biopsy predict for side specific extraprostatic cancer extension. J Urol 2004; 171: 1093-7.
18. Sebo TJ, Bock BJ, Cheville JC, Lohse C, Wollan P, Zincke H. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2000; 163: 174-8.
19. Robbins AS, Koppie TM, Gomez SL, Parikh-Patel A, Mills PK. Differences in prognostic factors and survival among white and Asian men with prostate cancer, California, 1995-2004. Cancer 2007; 110: 1255-63.
20. Ward JF, Zincke H, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Myers RP, Blute ML. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004; 172: 1328-32.
21. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr, Borsboom GJ, Eijkemans MJ, Vergouwe Y, Habbema JD. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 774-81.
22. Villers A, McNeal JE, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. The role of perineural space invasion in the local spread of prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol 1989; 142: 763-8.
23. Rosen MA, Goldstone L, Lapin S, Wheeler T, Scardino PT. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1992; 148: 331-7.
24. Hall GS, Kramer CE, Epstein JI. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. A comparative analysis of sampling methods. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16: 315-24.
25. McNeal JE, Villers AA, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Capsular penetration in prostate cancer. Significance for natural history and treatment. Am J Surg Pathol 1990; 14: 240-7.