Life-cycle cost of civil infrastructure with emphasis on balancing structural performance and seismiisk of road network

Structure and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 65-74

  Furuta, Hitoshi ^a   Frangopol, Dan M ^b   Nakatsu, Koichiro ^a  

^a KANSAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridge; Decision making; Genetic algorithm; Life cycle cost; Maintenance; Multi objective optimisation; Road network; Seismic risk

Indexed keywords

CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURES; DESIGN CONCEPT; EARTHQUAKE EXCITATION; LIFECYCLE COSTS; MAINTENANCE COST; MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMISATION; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; PROBABILITY OF FAILURE; ROAD NETWORK; SEISMIC RISK; SOCIO-ECONOMIC EFFECTS; STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

COMPUTER NETWORKS; COSTS; DECISION MAKING; EARTHQUAKES; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; LIFE CYCLE; MAINTENANCE; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; OCEAN STRUCTURES; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RELIABILITY THEORY; ROADS AND STREETS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 78449265032     PISSN: 15732479     EISSN: 17448980     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15732471003588346     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Chang, S.E. and Shinozuka, M., 1996. Life-cycle cost analysis with natural hazard risk. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2 (3), 118-126.
2. Ellingwood, B.R., 2005. Risk-informed condition assessment of civil infrastructure: state of practice and research issues. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 1 (1), 7-18.
3. Frangopol, D.M. and Furuta, H., eds. 2001. Life-cycle cost analysis and design of civil infrastructure systems. Reston, Virginia: ASCE.
4. Frangopol, D.M. and Liu, M., 2007. Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimisation, and life-cycle cost. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3 (1), 29-41.
5. Frangopol, D.M., Lin, K.-Y., and Estes, A.C., 1997. Lifecycle cost design of deteriorating structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123 (10), 1390-1401.
6. Furuta, H., Frangopol, D.M., and Saito, M., 1999. Application of genetic algorithm to life-cycle cost maintenance of bridges. In: Proceedings of 10th KKNN symposium, 16-20 August, Taejon, Korea, Taejon: KAIST.
7. Furuta, H., Nose, Y., Dogaki, M., and Frangopol, D.M., 2002. Bridge maintenance system of road network using life-cycle cost and benefit. In: Proceedings of IABMAS, July, Barcelona, Spain, Barcelona: CIMNE Publications. CD-ROM.
8. Furuta, H., Kameda, T., Fukuda, Y., and Frangopol, D.M., 2004. Life-cycle cost analysis for infrastructure systems: Life cycle cost vs. safety level vs. service life. Keynote Paper. In: D.M. Frangopol, E. Bruhwiler, M.H. Faber, and B. Adey, eds. Life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: Assessment, design and management. Reston, Virginia: ASCE, 19-25.
9. Furuta, H. and Koyama, K., 2003. Optimal maintenance planning of bridge structures considering earthquake effects. In: Proceedings of IFIP TC7 conference, Sophia Antipolis, France. Boston: Springer.
10. Furuta, H., Kameda, T., and Frangopol, D.M., 2004. MLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transporta Balance of structural performance measures. In: Proceedings of structures congress, May, Nashville, Tennessee. Reston, Virginia: ASCE, CD-ROM.
11. Furuta, H., Kameda, T., Nakahara, K., Takahashi, Y., and Frangopol, D.M., 2006. Optimal bridge maintenance planning using multi-objective genetic algorithm. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2 (1), 33-41.
12. Goldberg, D.E., 1989. Genetic algorithms in search, optimisation and machine learning. Toronto: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
13. JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers), 1996. Report on damage by Hanshin Awaji earthquake (in Japanese).
14. MLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation), Kinki Branch 1999. Road traffic census (in Japanese).
15. Kitano, H. ed. 1995. Genetic algorithm 3. Tokyo: Sangyotosho (in Japanese).
16. Liu, M. and Frangopol, D.M., 2004. Probabilistic maintenance prioritisation for deteriorating bridges using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 9th ASCE joint specialty conference on probabilistic mechanics and structural reliability, 26-28 July, Sandia National Laboratories, Omnipress, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Six pages on CD-ROM.
17. Liu, M. and Frangopol, D.M., 2004. Optimal bridge maintenance planning based on probabilistic performance prediction. Engineering Structures, 26 (7), 991-1002.
18. MLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation ion), 2002. Design Specifications for Highway Bridges. Tokyo: Maruzen (in Japanese).
19. Neves, L.C., Frangopol, D.M., and Hogg, V., 2003. Condition-reliability-cost interaction in bridge maintenance. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering (ICASP9), 2, 1117-1122.
20. Neves, L.A.C., Frangopol, D.M., and Cruz, P.J.S., 2006a. Probabilistic lifetime-oriented multi-objective optimisation of bridge maintenance: single maintenance type. Journal of Structural Engineering, 132 (6), 991-1005.
21. Neves, L.A.C., Frangopol, D.M., and Petcherdchoo, A., 2006b. Probabilistic lifetime-oriented multi-objective optimisation of bridge maintenance: combination of maintenance types. Journal of Structural Engineering, 132 (11),1821-1834.
22. Nihon Sogo Research Institute, 1998. Draft of guideline for evaluation of investment on road. Tokyo: NSRI (in Japanese).
23. Park, Y.J. and Ang, A.H.S., 1985. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 111 (4), 722-739.
24. Shoji, M., Fujino, Y., and Abe, M., 1997. Optimisation of seismic damage allocation of viaduct systems. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, No. 563, I-39, 79-94 (in Japanese).