Sequenced release of privacy-accurate information in a forensic investigation

Digital Investigation

Volumn 7, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 95-101

  Croft, N J ^a   Olivier, M S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Forensic investigation; Privacy; Privacy accurate; Privacy preserving object; Release; Sequence

Indexed keywords

DATA PRIVACY;

CRYPTOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES; FORENSIC INVESTIGATION; INFORMATION CONCERNING; PRIVACY PRESERVING; PRIVATE INFORMATION; RELEASE; SEQUENCE; SEQUENTIAL MANNERS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 78449264295     PISSN: 17422876     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.diin.2010.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. P.E. Agre, and M. Rotenberg Technology and privacy: the new landscape 1997 MIT Press Cambridge
2. M. Burmester, Y. Desmedt, R. Wright, and A. Yasinsac Security or privacy, must we choose? Proposition Paper 2002 Department of Computer Science, Florida State University
3. E. Casey Error, uncertainty and loss in digital evidence International Journal of Digital Evidence 1 2 2002
4. R. Clarke Introduction to dataveillance and information privacy, and definitions of terms Web reference http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/DV/ Intro.html 2006 [accessed October 2006]
5. Croft NJ. secure interoperations of wireless technologies. Master's Dissertation, University of Pretoria, School of Computer Science; October 2003.
6. Croft NJ, Olivier MS. Using a trusted third party proxy in achieving GSM anonymity. In: South African telecommunication network and applications conference. SATNAC; September 2004.
7. N.J. Croft and M.S. Olivier. Codec-hopping: secure and private voice communication in bandwidth constrained networks. In: SecPerU, workshop on security and privacy in pervasive ubiquitous computing, Santorini, Greece; April 2005a.
8. Croft NJ, Olivier MS. Using an approximated one-time pad for securing short message service (SMS). In: South African telecommunication network and applications conference. SATNAC; September 2005b.
9. Croft NJ, Olivier MS. Using compatible keys in achieving subscriber privacy channelling for billing in GSM networks. In: NIC, proceedings of the fifth international network conference; 2005c. pp. 245-52.
10. Croft NJ, Olivier MS. Anonymous mobile conference calls. In: South African telecommunication network and applications conference. SATNAC; September 2006.
11. Jiang X, Hong J, Landay J. Approximate information flows: Socially-based modeling of privacy in ubiquitous computing. In: Ubicomp, proceedings of fourth international conference on ubiquitous computing, vol. 2498; 2002. pp. 176-93.
12. Q. Liu, R. Safavi-Naini, and N.P. Sheppard Digital rights management for content distribution Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series 34 2003 49 58
13. National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST FIPS PUB 180-1. The secure hash algorithm (SHA-1) Technical Report April 1995 U.S. Department of Commerce
14. Nguyen D, Truong K. PHEmail: designing a privacy honoring email system. CHI '03 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pages 922-923, 2003.
15. J. Rachels Why privacy is important Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 1975 323 333
16. R. Rivest The MD5 message-digest algorithm RFC 1321 April 1992 Internet Engineering Task Force
17. G.W. van Blarkom, and J.J. Borking PET. Handbook of privacy and privacy-enhancing technologies 2003 Olk, J.G.E ISDN 90-74087-33-7