The Effects of Scandalous Information on Recall of Policy-Related Information

Political Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 887-914

  Miller, Beth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interference; Memory; Network model; Recall; Scandal

Indexed keywords

EID: 78449262313     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: 14679221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00786.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abele, A. (1985). Thinking about thinking: Causal, evaluative, and finalistic cognitions about social situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 315-332.
2. Abramowitz, A. I. (2001). It's Monica, stupid: The impeachment controversy and the 1998 midterm election. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26, 211-226.
3. Alford, J., Teeters, H., Ward, D. S., & Wilson, R. K. (1994). The political cost of congressional malfeasance. The Journal of Politics, 56, 788-801.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261-295.
5. Baum, M. A. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96, 91-109.
6. Baum, M. A. (2003). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence? Political Communication, 20, 173-190.
7. Baum, M. A., & Jamison, A. S. (2006). The Oprah effect: How soft news helps inattentive citizens vote consistently. Journal of Politics, 68, 946-959.
8. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., & Finkenauer, C. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
9. Bless, H., Hamilton, D. L., & Mackie, D. M. (1992). Mood effects on the organization of person information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 497-509.
10. Brown, S. C., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Encoding and retrieval of information. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 93-108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage.
12. Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed.; Vol. 1, pp. 323-418). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
14. Dimock, M. A., & Jacobson, G. C. (1995). Checks and choices: The House bank scandal's impact on voters in 1992. The Journal of Politics, 57, 1143-1159.
15. Fischle, M. (2000). Mass response to the Lewinsky scandal: Motivated reasoning or Bayesian updating. Political Psychology, 21, 135-159.
16. Fiske, S. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889-906.
17. Forgas, J. P., Goldenberg, L., & Unkelbach, C. (2009). Can bad weather improve your memory? An unobtrusive field study of natural mood effects on real-life memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 254-257.
18. Funk, C. (1996). The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits. Political Behavior, 18, 1-24.
19. Goren, P. (2002). Character weakness, partisan bias, and presidential evaluation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 627-641.
20. Gruneberg, M. M., & Morris, P. E. (1992). Aspects of memory: Practical aspects (Volume 1). London: Routledge.
21. Hamill, R., & Lodge, M. (1986). A partisan schema for political information processing. American Political Science Review, 80, 505-520.
22. Hamilton, D. L., & Huffman, L. J. (1971). Generality of impression formation processes for evaluative and nonevaluative judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 200-207.
23. Hastie, R. (1980). Memory for information that confirms or contradicts a general impression. In R. Hastie, T. M. Ostrom, E. B. Ebbesen, R. S. Wyer, D. L. Hamilton, & D. E. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception (pp. 155-177). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Huang, L. N., & Price, V. (2001). Motivations, goals, information search, and memory about political candidates. Political Psychology, 22, 665-692.
25. Jacobson, G. C., & Dimock, M. A. (1994). Checking out: The effects of bank overdrafts on the 1992 House elections. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 601-624.
26. Judd, C., & Krosnick, J. (1989). The structural bases of consistency among political attitudes: Effects of political expertise and attitude importance. In A. Pratkanis, S. Becker, & A. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 99-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (1997). A model of candidate evaluation in Senate elections: The impact of campaign intensity. Journal of Politics, 59, 1173-1205.
28. Katz, D., Gutek, B., Kahn, R. L., & Barton, E. (1975). Bureaucratic encounters. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Science Research.
29. Kelley, S., Jr. & Mirer, T. W. (1974). The simple act of voting. American Political Science Review, 68, 572-591.
30. Klinger, E., Barta, S. G., & Maxeiner, M. E. (1980). Motivational correlates of thought content frequency and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1222-1237.
31. Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing during election campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Lavine, H. (2001). Online models versus memory-based process models of political evaluation. In K. R. Monroe (Ed.), Political psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89, 309-326.
34. McGraw, K. M., Pinney, N., & Neumann, D. (1991). Memory for political actors: Contrasting the use of semantic and evaluative organizational strategies. Political Behavior, 13, 165-189.
35. McGraw, K. M., & Steenbergen, M. (1997). Pictures in the head: Memory representation of political candidates. In M. Lodge & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36. Newman, B. (2002). Bill Clinton's approval ratings: The more things change, the more they stay the same. Public Research Quarterly, 55, 781-804.
37. Ohira, H., Winton, W. M., & Oyama, M. (1997). Effects of stimulus valence on recognition memory and endogenous eyeblinks: Further evidence for positive-negative asymmetry. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 986-993.
38. Ostrom, T. M., Pryor, J. B., & Simpson, D. O. (1981). The organization of social information. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (pp. 3-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Ottati, V. C., Wyer, R. S., Deiger, M., & Houston, D. (2002). The psychological determinants of candidate evaluation and voting preference. In V. C. Ottati, R. S. Tindale, J. Edwards, F. B. Bryant, L. Heath, D. C. O'Connell, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, & E. J. Posavac (Eds.), The social psychology of politics (pp. 3-28). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plennum Publishers.
40. Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380-391.
41. Pryor, J. B., & Ostrom, T. M. (1981). The cognitive organization of social information: A converging operations approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 628-641.
42. Rahn, W. M. (1995). Candidate evaluation in complex information environments: Cognitive organization and comparison process. In M. Lodge & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 43-64). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
43. Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). You must remember this: A test of the on-line model of voting. Journal of Politics, 63, 29-58.
44. Robinson-Riegler, G. L., & Winton, W. M. (1996). The role of conscious recollection in recognition of affective material: Evidence for a positive-negative asymmetry. Journal of General Psychology, 123, 93-104.
45. Roediger, H. L., Gallo, D. A., & Geraci, L. (2002). Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of-processing framework. Memory, 10, 319-332.
46. Rundquist, B. S., Strom, G. S., & Peters, J. G. (1977). Corrupt politicians and their electoral support: Some experimental observations. American Political Science Review, 71, 273-280.
47. Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 527-561). New York: Guildford Press.
48. Sears, D. O. (1983) A person positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233-250.
49. Sedikides, C., Devine, P. G., & Fuhrman, R. W. (1991). Social perception in multitarget settings: Effects of motivated encoding strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 625-632.
50. Sedikides, C., & Ostrom, T. M. (1988). Are person categories used when organizing information about unfamiliar sets of persons? Social Cognition, 6, 252-267.
51. Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., Domke, D., & Fan, D. P. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton's public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 339-370.
52. Sigal, J., Hsu, L., Foodim, S., & Betman, J. (1988). Factors affecting perceptions of political candidates accused of sexual and financial misconduct. Political Psychology, 9, 273-280.
53. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
54. Srull, T. K. (1981). Person memory: Some tests of associate storage and retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 440-463.
55. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58-88.
56. Stoker, L. (1993). Judging presidential character: The demise of Gary Hart. Political Behavior, 15, 193-223.
57. Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2003). CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. January 5. Available at
58. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Zaller, J. R. (1996). The myth of massive media impact revived: New support for a discarded idea. In D. C. Mutz, R. A. Brody, & P. M. Sniderman (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
60. Zaller, J. R. (1998). Monica Lewinsky's contribution to political science. PS: Political Science and Politics, 31, 182-189.