Commitment to coercive care in relation to substance abuse reports to the social services. A 2-year follow-up

Nordic Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 372-376

  Lindahl, Marianne Larsson ^a,c   Öjehagen, Agneta ^b   Berglund, Mats ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Coercive care; Commitment; Global outcome; Mortality; Substance abuse

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; DEATH; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HOUSING; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; LAW; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; SOCIAL WORK; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; COERCION; COMMITMENT OF MENTALLY ILL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REHABILITATION, VOCATIONAL; SOCIAL WORK; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; SWEDEN;

EID: 78449242322     PISSN: 08039488     EISSN: 15024725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/08039481003710204     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Gallant DM, Faulkner M, Stoy D, Bishops MD, Langdon D. Enforced clinical treatment of paroled criminal alcoholics. A pilot evaluation. Quart J Stud Alcohol 1968;25:77-83.
2. Gallant DM, Bishop M P, Faulkner MU, Simpson L, Cooper A, Lathrop D. A comparative evaluation of compulsory (group therapy and/or Antabuse) and voluntary treatment of the chronic alcoholic municipal court offender. Psychosomatics 1968;9:306-10.
3. Gallant DM. Evaluation of compulsory treatment of the alcoholic municipal court offender. In: Mello NK, Mendelson JH, editors. Recent advances in studies of alcoholism. Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office; 1971.
4. Gallant DM, Bishop M P, Mouledoux A, Faulkner MA, Bresolara A, Swanson WA. The revolving door alcoholic: An impasse in the treatment of the chronic alcoholic. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1973;28:633-35.
5. Wild TC, Roberts AB, Cooper EL. Compulsory substance abuse treatment: An overview of recent findings and issues. Eur Addiction Res 2002;8:84-93.
6. Anglin MD. The efficacy of civil commitment in treating narcotic addiction. In: Leukefeld CG, Tims FM, editors. Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice. Research monograph series. Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office; 1988. p. 35-56.
7. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1994.
8. Arndt S, Black DW, Schmucker A, Zwick J. Association among outcomes in a naturalistic statewide assessment of substance user treatment. Substance Use Misuse 2004;39:1215-34.
9. Hubbard RL, Craddock SG, Anderson J. Overview of 5-year follow-up outcomes in the drug abuse treatment outcome studies (DATOS). J Subst Abuse Treat 2003;25:125-34.
10. Morgan MY, Landron F, Lehert P. Improvement in quality of life after treatment for alcohol dependence with acamprosate and psy-chosocial support. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2004;28:64-77.
11. Sindelar JL, Jofre-Bonet M, French MT, McLellan AT. Cost-effectiveness analysis of addiction treatment: Paradoxes of multiple outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004;73:41-51.
12. Moyer A, Finney JH. Outcomes for untreated individuals involved in randomized trials of alcohol treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002;23:247-52.
13. Månsson M, Hansson M, Moberg A.-L, Berglund M. Severity of alcohol dependence; Rating by patient records. Alcohol Alcohol 1993;28:347-51.