Using experimental ecology to understand stock enhancement: Comparisons of habitat-related predation on wild and hatchery-reared Penaeus plebejus Hess

Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology

Volumn 390, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 65-71

  Ochwada Doyle, Faith ^a,b   Gray, Charles A ^c   Loneragan, Neil R ^d   Taylor, Matthew D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b SYDNEY INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE   (Australia)

^c Cronulla Fisheries Research Centre   (Australia)

^d MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Eastern Australia; Fisheries management; Habitat structure; Macrophyte; Predation; Stock enhancement

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRUSTACEAN; FITNESS; HABITAT STRUCTURE; HATCHERY; MACROPHYTE; STOCK ENHANCEMENT; SURVIVAL;

ANIMALIA; CENTROPOGON AUSTRALIS; MELICERTUS PLEBEJUS; METAPENAEUS MACLEAYI;

EID: 78349309868     PISSN: 00220981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Addison, J.T., Bannister, R.C.A., 1994. Re-stocking and enhancement of clawed lobster stocks - a review. Crustaceana 67, 131-155.
2. Almany, G.R., 2004. Does increased habitat complexity reduce predation and competition in coral reef sh assemblages? Oikos 106, 275-284.
3. Álvarez, D., Nicieza, A.G., 2003. Predator avoidance behaviour in wild and hatchery-reared brown trout: the role of experience and domestication. J. Fish Biol. 63, 1565-1577.
4. Anderson, C.N.K., Hsieh, C., Sandin, S.A., Hewitt, R., Hollowed, A., Beddington, J.R., May, R.M., Sugihara, G., 2008. Why shing magnies uctuations in sh abundance. Nature 452, 835-839.
5. Araki, H., Cooper, B., Blouin, M.S., 2007. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative tness decline in the wild. Science 318, 100-103.
6. Arnold, S.J., Sellars, M.J., Crocos, P.J., Coman, G.J., 2005. Response of juvenile brown tiger shrimp (Penaeus esculentus) to intensive culture conditions in a ow through tank system with three-dimensional articial substrate. Aquaculture 246, 231-238.
7. Bell, J.D., Burchmore, J.J., Pollard, D.A., 1978. Feeding ecology of a scorpaenid sh, the fortescue Centropogon australis, from a Posidonia seagrass habitat in New South Wales. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 29, 175-185.
8. Bell, J.D., Rothlisberg, P.C., Munro, J.L., Loneragan, N.R., Nash, W.J., Ward, R.D., Andrew, N.L., 2005. Restocking and stock enhancement of marine invertebrate sheries. Adv. Mar. Biol. 49, 1-353.
9. Bell, J.D., Leber, K.M., Blankenship, H.L., Loneragan, N.R., Masuda, R., 2008. A new era for restocking, stock enhancement and sea ranching of coastal sheries resources. Rev. Fish. Sci. 16, 1-9.
10. Berejikian, B.A., Tezak, E.P., LaRae, A.L., 2003. Innate and enhanced predator recognition in hatchery-reared chincook salmon. Environ. Biol. Fishes 67, 241-251.
11. Blankenship, H.L., Leber, K.M., 1995. A responsible approach to marine stock enhancement. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 15, 167-175.
12. Brown, C., Day, R.L., 2002. The future of stock enhancements: lessons for hatchery practice from conservation biology. Fish Fish. 3, 79-94.
13. Brown, C., Laland, K., 2001. Social learning and life skills training for hatchery reared sh. J. Fish Biol. 59, 471-493.
14. Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
15. Colegrave, N., Riuxton, G.D., 2003. Condence intervals are a moe useful complement to non-signicant tests than are power calculations. Behav. Ecol. 14, 446-450.
16. Dall, W., Hill, B., Rothlisberg, P., Sharples, D., 1990a. The Biology of the Penaeidae. Academic Press, London. 1-488 pp.
17. Dall, W., Hill, B., Rothlisberg, P., Sharples, D., 1990b. Predation on Penaeids, The Biology of the Penaeidae. Academic Press, London, pp. 357-377.
18. Dall, W., Hill, B.J., Rothlisberg, P.C., Staples, D.J., 1990c. Food and Feeding, The Biology of the Penaeidae. Academic Press, London, pp. 314-332.
19. Davis, J.L.D., Young-Williams, A.C., Aguilar, R., Carswell, B.L., Goodison, M.R., Hines, A.H., Kramer, M.A., Zohar, Y., Zmora, O., 2004. Differences between hatchery-raised and wild blue crabs: implications for stock enhancement potential. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 133, 1-14.
20. Day, R.W., Quinn, G.P., 1989. Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecol. Monogr. 59, 433-463.
21. Einum, S., Fleming, I.A., 2001. Implications of stocking: ecological interactions between wild and released salmonids. Nord. J. Freshwat. Res. 75, 56-70.
22. Grimes, C.B., 1998. Marine stock enhancement: sound management or technoarrogance? Fisheries 23, 18-23.
23. Harmelin-Vivien, M.L., Bouchon, C., 1976. Feeding behavior of some carnivorous shes (Serranidae and Scorpaenidae) from Tuléar (Madagascar). Mar. Biol. 37, 329-340.
24. Hawkins, L.A., Amstrong, J.D., Magurran, A.E., 2004. Predator induced hyperventilation in wild and hatchery Atlantic salmon fry. J. Fish Biol. 65, 88-100.
25. Hawkins, L.A., Magurran, A.E., Armstrong, J.D., 2008. Ontogenetic learning of predator recognition in hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Anim. Behav. 75, 1663-1671.
26. Hilborn, R., 1998. The economic performance of marine stock enhancement projects. Bull. Mar. Sci. 62, 661-674.
27. Hilborn, R., 2007. Reinterpreting the state of sheries and their management. Ecosystems 10, 1362-1369.
28. Hill, B.J., Wassenberg, T.J., 1993. Why are some prawns found in seagrass? An experimental study of brown (Penaeus esculentus) and grooved (P. semisulcatus) tiger prawns. Mar. Freshw. Res. 44, 221-227.
29. Hvidsten, N.A., Lund, R.A., 1988. Predation on hatchery-reared and wild smolts of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, in the estuary of River Orkla, Norway. J. Fish Biol. 33, 121-126.
30. Ives, M.C., Scandol, J.P., 2007. A Bayesian analysis of NSW eastern king prawn stocks (Melicertus plebejus) using multiple model structures. Fish. Res. 84, 314-327.
31. Johnsson, J.I., Petersson, E., Jonsson, E., Bjornsson, B., Jarvi, T., 1996. Domestication and growth hormone alter antipredator behaviour and growth patterns in juvenile brown trout, Salmo trutta. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53, 1546-1554.
32. Johnsson, J.I., Hojesjo, J., Fleming, I.A., 2001. Behavioral and heart responses to predation risk in wild and domesticated Atlantic salmon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 788-794.
33. Kellison, G.T., Eggleston, D.B., Burke, J.S., 2000. Comparative behaviour and survival of hatchery-reared versus wild summer ounder (Paralichthys dentatus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57, 1870-1877.
34. Kenyon, R.A., Loneragan, N.R., Hughes, J.M., 1995. Habitat type and light affect sheltering behavior of juvenile tiger prawns (Penaeus esculentus Haswell) and success rates of their sh predators. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 192, 87-105.
35. Leber, K.M., 2002. Advances in marine stock enhancement: shifting emphasis to theory and accountability. In: Stickney, R.R., McVey, J.P. (Eds.), Responsible Marine Aquaculture. CABI Publishing, Maryland, pp. 79-89.
36. Liu, H., Loneragan, N.R., 1997. Size and time of day affect the response of postlarvae and early juvenile grooved tiger prawns Penaeus semisulcatus De Haan (Decapoda: Penaeidae) to natural and articial seagrass in the laboratory. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 211, 263-277.
37. Ludwig, D., Hilborn, R., Waters, C., 1993. Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. Science 260, 17-36.
38. Meager, J.J., Williamson, I., Loneragan, N.R., Vance, D.J., 2005. Habitat selection of juvenile banana prawns, Penaeus merguiensis de Man: testing the roles of habitat structure, predators, light phase and prawn size. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 324, 89-98.
39. Minello, T.J., Zimmerman, R.J., 1983. Fish predation on juvenile brown shrimp, Penaeus aztecus Ives: the effect of simulated Spartina structure on predation rates. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 72, 211-231.
40. Minello, T.J., Zimmerman, R.J., 1985. Differential selection for vegetative structure between juvenile brown shrimp (Penaeus aztecus) and white shrimp (P. setiferus), and implications in predator-prey relationships. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 20, 707-716.
41. Nakagawa, S., Cuthill, I.C., 2007. Effect size, condence interval and statistical signicance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol. Rev. Camb. 82, 591-605.
42. Ochwada, F., Loneragan, N.R., Gray, C.A., Suthers, I.M., Taylor, M.D., 2009. Complexity affects habitat preference and predation mortality in postlarval Penaeus plebejus: implications for stock enhancement. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 380, 161-171.
43. Olla, B.L., Davis, M.W., 1989. The role of learning and stress in predator avoidance of hatchery-reared coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) juveniles. Aquaculture 76, 209-214.
44. Olla, B.L., Davis, M.W., Ryer, C.H., 1998. Understanding how the hatchery environment represses or promotes the development of behavioral survival skills. Bull. Mar. Sci. 62, 531-550.
45. Peterson, C.H., Black, R., 1994. An experimentalist's challenge: when artifacts of intervention interact with treatments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 111, 289-297.
46. Pikitch, E., Santora, C., Babcock, E.A., Bakun, A., Bonl, R., Conover, D.O., Dayton, P., Doukakis, P., Fluharty, D., Heneman, B., Houde, E.D., Link, J., Livingston, P.A., Mangel, M.,McAllister,M.K.,Pope,J.,Sainsbury,J.2004.Ecosystem-basedshery management. Science 305, 346-347.
47. Primavera, J.H., 1997. Fish predation on mangrove-associated penaeids: the role of structures and substrate. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 215, 205-216.
48. Rothlisberg, P.C., Preston, N.P., Loneragan, N.R., Die, D.J., Poiner, I.R., 1999. Approaches to reseeding penaeid prawns. In: Howell, B.R., Moksness, E., Svasand, T. (Eds.), Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching. Fishing News Books, Oxford, pp. 365-378.
49. Roy, P.S., Williams, R.J., Jones, A.R., Yassini, I., Gibbs, P.J., Coates, B., West, R.J., Scanes, P.R., Hudson, J.P., Nichol, S., 2001. Structure and function of south-east Australian estuaries. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 53, 351-384.
50. Ruello, N.V., 1973. Burrowing, feeding and spatial distribution of the school prawn Metapenaeus macleayi (Haswell) in the hunter river region, Australia. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 13, 189-206.
51. Ryer, C., 2004. Comparison of genetically based antipredator behaviour in hatchery and wild coho fry from a coastal Oregon river: interpreting a negative result. J. Fish Biol. 64, 1413-1418.
52. Steiger, J.H., 2004. Beyond the F test: effect size condence intervals and tests of close t in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis. Psychol. Methods 9, 164-182.
53. Stunz, G.W., Minello, T.J., 2001. Habitat-related predation on juvenile wild-caught and hatchery-reared red drum Sciaenops ocellatus (Linnaeus). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 260, 13-25.
54. Taylor, M.D., Suthers, I.M., 2008. A predatory impact model and targeted stock enhancement approach for optimal release of mulloway (Argyroromus japonicus). Rev. Fish. Sci. 16, 125-134.
55. Taylor, M.D., Palmer, P.J., Fielder, D.S., Suthers, I.M., 2005. Responsible estuarine nsh stock enhancement: an Australian perspective. J. Fish Biol. 67, 299-331.
56. Thomas, L., 1997. Retrospective power analysis. Conserv. Biol. 11, 276-280.
57. Underwood, A.J., 2007. Negative interactions: an overview of competition among marine organisms. In: Connell, S.D., Gillanders, B.M. (Eds.), Marine Ecology. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp. 101-109.
58. Ye, Y., Loneragan, N., Die, D., Watson, R., Harch, B., 2005. Bioeconomic modelling and risk assessment of tiger prawn (Penaeus esculentus) stock enhancement in Exmouth Gulf, Australia. Fish. Res. 73, 231-249.
59. Young, A.C., Johnson, E.G., Davis, J.L.D., Hines, A.H., Zmora, O., Zohar, Y., 2008. Do hatchery-reared blue crabs differ from wild crabs and does it matter? Rev. Fish. Sci. 16, 254-261.