Laboratory model tests and field investigations of EPB shield machine tunnelling in soft ground in Shanghai

Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-14

  Xu, Qianwei ^a   Zhu, Hehua ^a   Ding, Wenqi ^a   Ge, Xiurun ^b  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Model test; Shield tunnelling; Soft ground; Soil shield machine system

Indexed keywords

APERTURE RATIO; CHAMBER PRESSURE; CUTTING TORQUE; EARTH PRESSURE; EARTH PRESSURE BALANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS; EXISTING STRUCTURE; FIELD INVESTIGATION; GROUND SURFACE SETTLEMENTS; GROUND SURFACES; LABORATORY MODEL TEST; MACHINE OPERATION; MODEL TESTS; OPERATION PARAMETERS; ROTATION SPEED; SHIELD MACHINE; SHIELD TUNNELLING; SOFT GROUND; SOIL DISTURBANCES; SURROUNDING SOILS; TEST RESULTS; THRUST FORCES; TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION; TUNNEL SURFACE;

PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION; RETAINING WALLS; SOILS; TESTING; TUNNELING (EXCAVATION); TUNNELING MACHINES;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

DISPLACEMENT; EARTH PRESSURE; LABORATORY METHOD; MODELING; SOFT SOIL; TUNNELING;

CHINA; SHANGHAI;

EID: 78349306353     PISSN: 08867798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2010.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Harris DI., Mair RJ., Love JP., Taylor RN., Henderson TO. Observations of ground and structure movements for compensation grouting during tunnel construction at Waterloo station. Geotechnique 1994, 44(4):691-713.
2. Kashima Y., Kondo N., Inoue M. Development and application of the DPLEX shield method: results of experiments using shield and segment models and application of the method in tunnel construction [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1996, 11(1):45-50.
3. Lee Y.J., Bassett R.H. Influence zones for 2D pile-soil-tunnelling interaction based on model test and numerical analysis [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2007, 22:325-342.
4. Maeda M., Kushiyama K. Use of compact shield tunneling method in urban underground construction. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2005, 20:159-166.
5. Meguid MA., Saada O., Nunes MA., et al. Physical modeling of tunnels in soft ground: a review [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2008, 23:185-198.
6. Migliazza M., Chiorboli M., Giani GP. Comparison of analytical method, 3D finite element model with experimental subsidence measurements resulting from the extension of the Milan underground [J]. Computers and Geotechnics 2009, (36):113-124.
7. Nakamura H., Kubota T., Furukawa M., et al. Unified construction of running track tunnel and crossover tunnel for subway by rectangular shape double track cross-section shield machine. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2003, 18:253-262.
8. Nomoto T., Imamura S., Hagiwara T., et al. Shield tunnel construction in centrifuge [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 1999, 125(4):289-300.
9. Peck, R.B., 1969. Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico City, pp. 225-290.
10. Pellet-Beaucour A.L., Kastner R. Experimental and analytical study of friction forces during micro-tunneling operations [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2002, 17:83-97.
11. Rowe RK., Kack GJ. A theoretical examination of the settlements induced by tunneling: from cases history. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 1983, 20(2):299-314.
12. Sharma JS., Bolton MD., Boyle RE. A new technique for simulation of tunnel excavation in a centrifuge [J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal 2001, 24(4):343-349.
13. Sterpi D., Cividini A. A physical and numerical investigation on the stability of shallow tunnels in strain softening media [J]. Rock Mechanical and Rock Engineering 2004, 37(4):277-298.
14. Viswanadham B.V.S. Centrifuge modeling of geotechnical structures [J]. Chemical Business 2005, 59-65.