The effect of stimulus expectancy on dishabituation of auditory evoked potentials

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 251-256

  Viswanathan, Deepa ^a   Jansen, Ben H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked potential; Expectancy; Habituation; Stimulus complexity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADULT; AWARENESS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSORY GATING; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78349304412     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Adler L.E., Pachtman E., Franks R.D., Pecevich M., Waldo M.C., Freedman R. Neurophysiological evidence for a defect in neuronal mechanisms involved in sensory gating in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 1982, 17:639-654.
2. Budd T.W., Barry R.J., Gordon E., Rennie C., Michie P.T. Decrement of the N1 auditory event related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs refractoriness. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1998, 31:51-68.
3. Butler R.A. Effects of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity on habituation of the human vertex potential. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1968, 44:945-950.
4. Callaway E. Habituation of average evoked potentials in man. Habituation 1973, Vol. II:153-174. Academic press, New York. H. Peeke, M. Herz (Eds.).
5. Clementz B.A., Barber S.K., Dzau J.R. Knowledge of stimulus repetition affects the magnitude and spatial distribution of low frequency event-related brain potentials. Audiology, Neuro-Otology 2002, 7:303-314.
6. Cowan N. Attention and Memory 1995, Oxford University Press, New York.
7. Crowley K.E., Colrain I.M. A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004, 115:732-744.
8. Davis M., File S. Intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms of habituation and sensitization: implications for the design and analysis of experiments. Habituation, and Sensitization, and Behavior 1984, 287-323. Academic Press, NY.
9. Davis H., Mast T., Yoshie N., Zerlin S. The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: recovery cycle process. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1966, 21:105-113.
10. Franks R., Adler L., Waldo M., Alpert J., Freedman R. Neurophysiological studies of sensory gating in mania: comparison with schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 1983, 18:989-1005.
11. Fruhstorfer H., Soveri P., Jarvilehto T. Short term habituation of the auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1970, 28:153-161.
12. Gutterman Y., Josiassen R.C., Bashore T.R. Attentional influence on the P50 component of the auditory event-related brain potential. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1992, 12:197-209.
13. Jerger K., Biggins C., Fein G. P50 suppression is not affected by attentional manipulations. Biological Psychiatry 1992, 31:365-377.
14. Näätänen R. Attention and Brain Function 1992, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
15. Näätänen R., Picton T.W. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound. Psychophysiology 1987, 24:375-425.
16. Ritter W., Vaughan H.G., Costa L.D. Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: a study of short term changes in averaged evoked responses. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1968, 25:550-556.
17. Rosburg T., Trautner O., Korzyukov O.A., Boutros N.N., Schaller C., Elger C.E., Kurthen M. Short term habituation of intracranially recorded auditory evoked potentials P50 and N100. NeuroScience Letters 2004, 372:245-249.
18. Rothman H.H., Davis H., Hay I.S. Slow evoked cortical potentials and temporal features of stimulation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1970, 29:225-232.
19. Savostyanov A.N., Illjutchenok R.Ju., Savostyanova D.A. Dynamics of acoustical evoked potentials on a background of habituation to verbal stimulus in persons with different anxiety levels. Acta Biologica Hungarica 2002, 53(4):575-587.
20. Schafer E.W.P., Marcus M.M. Self-stimulation alters human sensory brain responses. Science 1973, 181(4095):175-177.
21. Schafer E.W.P., Amochaev A., Russell M.J. Knowledge of stimulus timing attenuates human evoked cortical potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1981, 52:9-17.
22. Shahin A.J., Roberts L.E., Miller L.M., McDonald K.L., Alain C. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds. Journal Brain Topography 2007, 20(2):55-61.
23. Sokolov E.N. Perception and the Conditioned Reflex 1963, Pergamon, Oxford.
24. Venables P. Input dysfunction in schizophrenia. Progress in Experimental Personality Research 1964.
25. White P., Yee C.M. Effects of attentional and stressor manipulations on the P50 gating response. Psychophysiology 1997, 34:703-711.
26. Woods D.L., Elmasian R. The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sound and tones. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 1986, 65:447-459.
27. Zouridakis G., Boutros N.N. Stimulus parameter effects on P50 evoked response. Biological Psychiatry 1992, 32:839-841.