Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study: Part 1: Gender, stroke types, ethnicity, and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke

Neurology

Volumn 75, Issue 18, 2010, Pages 1597-1607

  Feigin, V L ^a   Barker Collo, S ^b   Parag, V ^c   Senior, H ^d   Lawes, C M M ^c   Ratnasabapathy, Y ^c   Glen, E ^c  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

^b Faculty of Sciences   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADL DISABILITY; AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEMENTIA; DEPRESSION; DISABILITY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GENDER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; STROKE; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; SURVIVOR;

AGED; COMMUNITY HEALTH PLANNING; DISABILITY EVALUATION; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; NEW ZEALAND; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78349299057     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: 1526632X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fb44b3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Woo J, Kay R, Yuen YK, Nicholls MG. Factors influ-encing long-term survival and disability among three-month stroke survivors. Neuroepidemiology 1992;11: 143-150.
2. Patel MD, Coshall C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Cognitive impairment after stroke: clinical determinants and its asso-ciations with long-term stroke outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:700-706.
3. Sudlow CLM, Warlow CP. Comparing stroke incidence worldwide: what makes studies comparable? Stroke 1996; 27:550-558.
4. WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Dis-ability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
5. Anderson CS, Carter KN, Hackett ML, et al. Trends in stroke incidence in Auckland, New Zealand, during 1981 to 2003. Stroke 2005;36:2087-2093.
6. Aho K, Harmsen P, Hatano S, Marquardsen J, Smirnov VE, Strasser T. Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ 1980;58:113-130.
7. Feigin V, Carter K, Hackett M, et al. Ethnic disparities in incidence ofstroke subtypes: Auckland Regional Commu-nity Stroke Study, 2002-2003. Lancet Neurol 2006;5: 130-139.
8. Goldstein LB, Bertels C, Davis JN. Interrater reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale.Arch Neurol 1989;46:660-662.
9. Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. CVLT-II: Cal-ifornia Verbal Learning Test. San Antonio, TX: Psycho-logical Corporation; 2000.
10. Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale: Revised. San Anto-nio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1987.
11. Spreen O, Strauss E. A Compendium of Neuropsycholog-ical Tests: Administration, Norms and Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998
12. Rey A. l'Examen psychologique dans le cas d'encephalopathie traumatique.Arch Psychol 1941;28:286-340.
13. Kaplan EF, Goodglass H, Wintraub S. The Boston Nam-ing Test: Experimental Edition. Philadelphia: Lea & Fe-biger; 1983.
14. Spreen O, Benton AL. Neurosensory Center Comprehen-sive Examination for Aphasia (NCCEA). Victoria, BC: Neuropsychology Laboratory; 1977.
15. Gauthier L, DeHaut F, Joanette Y. The Bells Test: a quan-titative and qualitative test for visual neglect. Int J Clin Neuropsychol 1989;11:49-54.
16. Partington JE, Leiter RG. Partington's Pathway Test. Psy-chological Service Center Bulletin 1949;1:9-20.
17. Regard M. Regard M. Cognitive Rigidity and Flexibility: A Neuropsychological Study. Victoria: University ofVic-toria; 1981.
18. Sandford JA, Turner A. Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test Manual. Richmond, VA: Braintrain Inc.; 2000.
19. Sarasqueta C, Bergareche A, Arce A, et al. The validity of Hodkinson's Abbreviated Mental Test for dementia screening in Guipuzcoa, Spain. Eur J Neurol 2001;8:435-440.
20. Goldberg P. Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson; 1978.
21. Friedman B, Heisel MJ, Delavan RL. Psychometric prop-erties of the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale in func-tionally impaired, cognitively intact, community-dwelling elderly primary care patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53: 1570-1576.
22. Carrete P, Augustovski F, Gimpel N, et al. Validation of a telephone-administered geriatric depression scale in a His-panic elderly population [see comment]. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:446-450.
23. Sulter G, Steen C, De KJ. Use of the Barthel index and modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke 1999; 30:1538-1541.
24. Wade DT, Legh-Smith J, Langton HR. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med 1985;7:176-181.
25. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Bar-thelIndex.Md Med J 1965;14:61-65.
26. Leathem JM, Murphy LJ, Flett RA. Self-and informant-ratings on the patient competency rating scale in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1998;20:694-705.
27. Dorman P, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Are the modified "simple questions" a valid and reliable measure of health related quality of life after stroke? United Kingdom Col-laborators in the International Stroke Trial. J Neurol Neu-rosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:487-493.
28. Harwood RH, Rogers A, Dickinson E, Ebrahim S. Mea-suring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new out-come measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care 1994; 3:11-16.
29. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A Users Manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre; 1994.
30. Steinberg BA, Bieliauskas LA, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Malec JF. Mayo's Older Americans Normative Studies: age-and IQ-adjusted norms for the Auditory Verbal Learning Test and the Visual Spatial Learning Test. Clin Neuropsychol 2005;19:464-523.
31. Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms and Com-mentary, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
32. Desmond DW, Moroney JT, Sano M, Stern Y. Recovery ofcognitive function after stroke. Stroke 1996;27:1798-1803.
33. Hackett ML, Duncan JR, Anderson CS, Broad JB, Bonita R. Health-related quality oflife among long-term survivors ofstroke: results from the Auckland Stroke Study 1991-1992. Stroke 2000; 31: 440-447.
34. Bonita R, Solomon N, Broad JB. Prevalence ofstroke and stroke-related disability: estimates from the Auckland Stroke Studies. Stroke 1997;28:1898-1902.
35. Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, Forbes S, Anderson CS. Long-term disability after first-ever stroke and re-lated prognostic factors in the Perth Community Stroke Study, 1989-1990. Stroke 2002;33:1034-1040.
36. Chausson N, Olindo S, Cabre P, Saint-Vil M, Smadja D. Five-year outcome of a stroke cohort in Martinique, French West Indies: Etude Realisee en Martinique et Centree sur l'Incidence des Accidents Vasculaires Cerebraux, Part 2. Stroke 2010;41:594.
37. Toschke AM, Tilling K, Cox AM, Rudd AG, Heuschmann PU, Wolfe CDA. Patient-specific recovery patterns over time measured by dependence in activities ofdaily living after stroke and post-stroke care: The South Lon-don Stroke Register (SLSR). Eur J Neurol 2010;17: 219-225.
38. Dhamoon MS, Moon YP, Paik MC, et al. Long-term functional recovery after first ischemic stroke: The North-ern Manhattan Study. Stroke 2009;40:2805-2811.
39. Pendlebury ST, Rothwell PM. Prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke demen-tia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:1006-1018.
40. Patel MD, McKevitt C, Lawrence E, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD, Wolfe CDA. Clinical determinants of long-term quality of life after stroke. Age Ageing 2007;36:316-322