The analysis of case cohort design in the presence of competing risks with application to estimate the risk of delayed cardiac toxicity among Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 29, Issue 27, 2010, Pages 2802-2810

  Pintilie, Melania ^a,b   Bai, Yan ^b   Yun, Lingsong ^c   Hodgson, David C ^a,b,d  

^a PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Case cohort; Competing risks; Cox proportional hazards model; Fine and Gray model; Subdistribution

Indexed keywords

DOXORUBICIN;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURVIVOR; CARDIOTOXICITY; CASE COHORT DESIGN; CASE STUDY; COHORT ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; HAZARD RATIO; HODGKIN DISEASE; HUMAN; JACKKNIFE TEST; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL;

AGE FACTORS; ALGORITHMS; COHORT STUDIES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOXORUBICIN; EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH DESIGN; FEMALE; HEART DISEASES; HODGKIN DISEASE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LYMPHATIC IRRADIATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ONTARIO; PROBABILITY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RISK; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 78349298677     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.4056     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Prentice RL. A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika 1986; 73:1-11.
2. Barlow WE, Ichikawa L, Rosner D, Izumi S. Analysis of case-cohort designs. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1999; 52:1165-1172.
3. Borgan O, Goldstein L, Langholz B. Methods for the analysis of sampled cohort data in the cox proportional hazards model. Annals of Statistics 1995; 23:1749-1778.
4. Barlow WE. Robust variance-estimation for the case-cohort design. Biometrics 1994; 50:1064-1072.
5. Self SG, Prentice RL. Asymptotic-distribution theory and efficiency results for case cohort studies. Annals of Statistics 1988; 16:64-81.
6. Therneau TM, Li HZ. Computing the Cox model for case cohort designs. Lifetime Data Analysis 1999; 5:99-112.
7. Sorensen P, Andersen PK. Competing risks analysis of the case-cohort design. Biometrika 2000; 87:49-59.
8. Crowder MJ. Classical Competing Risks. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press: London, 2001.
9. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1999; 94:496-509.
10. Tibshirani RJ, Efron B. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall: New York, 1993.
11. Lag R, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Stinchcomb DG, Howlader N, Horner MJ, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Altekruse SF, Lewis DR, Clegg L, Eisner MP, Reichman M, Edwards BK. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2005. National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, 2008.
12. Myrehaug S, Pintilie M, Tsang R, Mackenzie R, Crump M, Chen ZL, Sun A, Hodgson DC. Cardiac morbidity following modern treatment for hodgkin lymphoma: supra-additive cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin and radiation therapy. Leukemia and Lymphoma 2008; 49:1486-1493.