Multidetector CT of living renal donors: Lessons learned from surgeons

Radiographics

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1875-1890

  Sebastià, Carmen ^a   Peri, Lluis ^a   Salvador, Rafael ^a   Buñesch, Laura ^a   Revuelta, Ignacio ^a   Alcaraz, Antonio ^a   Nicolau, Carlos ^a  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; KIDNEY DISEASE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONOR; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; RADIOGRAPHY;

HUMANS; KIDNEY DISEASES; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONORS; PATIENT SELECTION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 78349297868     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.307105032     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Chai JW, Lee W, Yin YH, et al. CT angiography for living kidney donors: accuracy, cause of misinterpretation and prevalence of variation. Korean J Radiol 2008;9(4):333-339.
2. Türkvatan A, Akinci S, Yildiz S, Olçer T, Cumhur T. MDCT for preoperative evaluation of vascular anatomy in living renal donors. Surg Radiol Anat 2009;31(4):227-235.
3. Blondin D, Andersen K, Kroepil P, et al. Analysis of 64-row multidetector CT images for preoperative angiographic evaluation of potential living kidney donors [in German]. Radiologe 2008;48(7):673-680.
4. Gluecker TM, Mayr M, Schwarz J, et al. Comparison of CT angiography with MR angiography in the preoperative assessment of living kidney donors. Transplantation 2008;86(9):1249-1256.
5. Pozniak MA, Balison DJ, Lee FT Jr, Tambeaux RH, Uehling DT, Moon TD. CT angiography of potential renal transplant donors. RadioGraphics 1998;18 (3):565-587.
6. Kawamoto S, Lawler LP, Fishman EK. Evaluation of the renal venous system on late arterial and venous phase images with MDCT angiography in potential living laparoscopic renal donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184(2):539-545.
7. Namasivayam S, Kalra MK, Waldrop SM, Mittal PK, Small WC. Multidetector row CT angiography of living related renal donors: is there a need for venous phase imaging? Eur J Radiol 2006;59(3): 442-452.
8. Zamboni GA, Romero JY, Raptopoulos VD. Combined vascular-excretory phase MDCT angiography in the preoperative evaluation of renal donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(1):145-150.
9. Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, et al. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology 2002;222(2): 353-360.
10. Chow LC, Kwan SW, Olcott EW, Sommer G. Splitbolus MDCT urography with synchronous nephrographic and excretory phase enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(2):314-322.
11. Korobkin M. CT urography. Eur Radiol 2005;15 (suppl 4):D82-D84.
12. Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Hahn PF, Saini S. 16-MDCT angiography in living kidney donors at various tube potentials: impact on image quality and radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(1):115-120.
13. Kang KY, Lee YJ, Park SC, et al. A comparative study of methods of estimating kidney length in kidney transplantation donors. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22(8):2322-2327.
14. Rastogi N, Sahani DV, Blake MA, Ko DC, Mueller PR. Evaluation of living renal donors: accuracy of three-dimensional 16-section CT. Radiology 2006; 240(1):136-144.
15. Singh AK, Sahani DV, Kagay CR, et al. Semiautomated MIP images created directly on 16-section multidetector CT console for evaluation of living renal donors. Radiology 2007;244(2):583-590.
16. Kim JK, Kim JH, Bae SJ, Cho KS. CT angiography for evaluation of living renal donors: comparison of four reconstruction methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183(2):471-477.
17. Kumar A, Das SK, Srivastava A. Expanding the living related donor pool in renal transplantation: use of marginal donors. Transplant Proc 2003;35(1): 28-29.
18. Papanikolaou V, Giakoustidis D, Antoniadis N, Ouzounidis N, Takoudas D, Antoniadis A. Livingrelated transplantation of an ectopic pelvic kidney. Int J Urol 2007;14(4):357-359.
19. Schumacher M, Studer UE, Danuser H. Antegrade endopyelotomy for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in transplanted kidneys. J Endourol 2006;20(5):305-308.
20. Uflacker R. Abdominal aorta and branches. In: Uflacker R, ed. Atlas of vascular anatomy: an angiographic approach. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006; 111-222.
21. Kadir S. Angiography of the kidneys. In: Kadir S, ed. Diagnostic angiography. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1986; 445-449.
22. Kawamoto S, Montgomery RA, Lawler LP, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Multi-detector row CT evaluation of living renal donors prior to laparoscopic nephrectomy. RadioGraphics 2004;24(2):453-466.
23. Satyapal KS, Haffejee AA, Singh B, Ramsaroop L, Robbs JV, Kalideen JM. Additional renal arteries: incidence and morphometry. Surg Radiol Anat 2001; 23(1):33-38.
24. Neymark E, LaBerge JM, Hirose R, et al. Arteriographic detection of renovascular disease in potential renal donors: incidence and effect on donor surgery. Radiology 2000;214(3):755-760.
25. Slovut DP, Olin JW. Fibromuscular dysplasia. N Engl J Med 2004;350(18):1862-1871.
26. Blondin D, Lanzman R, Schellhammer F, et al. Fibromuscular dysplasia in living renal donors: still a challenge to computed tomographic angiography. Eur J Radiol 2010;75(1):67-71.
27. Kawamoto S, Fishman EK. MDCT angiography of living laparoscopic renal donors. Abdom Imaging 2006;31(3):361-373.
28. Urban BA, Ratner LE, Fishman EK. Three-dimensional volume-rendered CT angiography of the renal arteries and veins: normal anatomy, variants, and clinical applications. RadioGraphics 2001;21(2): 373-386, 549-555.
29. Uflacker R. Veins of abdomen and pelvis. In: Uflacker R, ed. Atlas of vascular anatomy: an angiographic approach. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006; 333-444.
30. Rydberg J, Kopecky KK, Tann M, et al. Evaluation of prospective living renal donors for laparoscopic nephrectomy with multisection CT: the marriage of minimally invasive imaging with minimally invasive surgery. RadioGraphics 2001;21(spec no):S223-S236.
31. Anderson KM, Lindler TU, Lamberton GR, Baron PW, Ojogho OK, Baldwin DD. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: effect of perirenal fat upon donor operative time. J Endourol 2008;22(10):2269-2274.
32. Martin G, Sundaram CP, Sharfuddin A, Govani M. Asymptomatic urolithiasis in living donor transplant kidneys: initial results. Urology 2007;70(1):2-5; discussion 5-6.
33. Trivedi A, Patel S, Devra A, Rizvi J, Goel R, Modi P. Management of calculi in a donor kidney. Transplant Proc 2007;39(3):761-762.
34. Grotemeyer D, Voiculescu A, Iskandar F, et al. Renal cysts in living donor kidney transplantation: longterm follow-up in 25 patients. Transplant Proc 2009; 41(10):4047-4051.
35. Sener A, Uberoi V, Bartlett ST, Kramer AC, Phelan MW. Living-donor renal transplantation of grafts with incidental renal masses after ex-vivo partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2009;104(11):1655-1660.
36. Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Thomas M, et al. Donor kidneys with small renal cell cancers: can they be transplanted? Transplant Proc 2005;37(2):581-582.
37. Ghafari A. Transplantation of a kidney with a renal cell carcinoma after living donation: a case report. Transplant Proc 2007;39(5):1660-1661.
38. Mitsuhata N, Ito S, Mannami M, Kojima K, Mannami R, Nishi M. Donor kidneys with small renal cell cancer or low-grade lower ureteral cancer can be transplanted. Transplantation 2007;83(11): 1522-1523.
39. Huang J, Kim YH, Shankar S, Tyagi G, Baker SP. Multidetector CT urography: comparison of two different scanning protocols for improved visualization of the urinary tract. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30(1):33-36.