Infrapopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus bypass surgery as first-line strategies in critical leg ischemia: A propensity score analysis

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 252, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 765-772

  Söderström, Maria I ^a   Arvela, Eva M ^a   Korhonen, Maria ^b   Halmesmäki, Karoliina H ^a   Albäck, Anders N ^a   Biancari, Fausto ^c   Lepäntalo, Mauri J ^a   Venermo, Maarit A ^a  

^a HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMOROPOPLITEAL BYPASS; HUMAN; INFRAPOPLITEAL PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LEG ISCHEMIA; LEG REVASCULARIZATION; LIMB SALVAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AMPUTATION; AMPUTATION FREE SURVIVAL; BYPASS SURGERY; CRITICAL ISCHEMIC LEG; LONG TERM CARE; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL;

AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; ISCHEMIA; LEG; LIMB SALVAGE; MALE; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78349290056     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fc3c73     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Romiti M, Albers M, Brochado-Neto F, et al. Meta-analysis ofinfra-popliteal angioplasty for chronic critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:975-981.
2. Blackstone E. Comparing apples and oranges. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:8-15.
3. D'Agostino R Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265-2281.
4. Levey A, Bosh J, Lewis J, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461-470.
5. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification ofdiet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerularfiltrationrate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:247-254.
6. Levey A, Coresh J, Balk E, et al. National Kidney Foundation practice guide-lines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:137-147.
7. Rutherford R, Baker J, Ernst C, et al. Recommended standards for reports deal-ing with lower extremity ischemia; revised version. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:517-538.
8. BASIL Trial Participants. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg(BASIL):multicentre randomized control led trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1925-1934.
9. Bradbury AW, Adam DJ, Bell J, et al. Multicentre randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a bypass-surgery-first versus a balloon-angioplasty-first revascularisation strategy for severe limb ischaemia due to infrainguinal disease. The Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(114):1-210.
10. Lepäntalo M, Laurila K, Roth W-D, et al. PTFE bypass or thrupass for su-perficial femoral artery occlusion? A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:578-584.
11. Norgren L, Hiatt W, Dormandy J, et al. Inter-society consensus for the man-agement ofperipheral arterial disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33:S5-S75.
12. TASC Working Group. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19:S1-S250.
13. Kukkonen T, Korhonen M, Halmesmaki K, et al. Poor inter-observer agreement on the TASC II classification offemoropopliteal lesions. Eur J VascEndovasc Surg. 2010;39:220-224.
14. Jensen L, Nielsen O, Schroeder T. The importance pfcomplete follow-up for results after femoro-infrapopliteal vascular surgery Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;12:282-286.
15. Diehm N, Pattynama P, Jaff M, et al. Clinical endpoints in peripheral endovas-cular revascularization trials: a case for standardized definitions. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36:409-419.
16. Luther M, Lepäntalo M. Femoropopliteal reconstructions\influence ofrisk factors on outcome. Ann Chir Gyn. 1996;85:238-246.
17. Arvela E, Söderström M, Albäck A, et al. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as a predictor of outcome after infra-inguinal bypass in patients with critical limb ischemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36:77-83.
18. Awad S, Karkos C, Serrachino-Inglott F, et al. The impact ofdiabetes on current revascularisation practice and clinical outcome in patients with critical lower limb ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32:51-59.
19. Biancari F, Salenius J-P, Heikkinen M, et al. Risk-scoring method for prediction of 30-day postoperative outcome after infrainguinal surgical revascularization for critical lower-limb ischemia: a Finnvasc Registry study. World J Surg. 2007;31:217-225.
20. Eskelinen E, Albäck A, Roth W-D, et al. Infra-inguinal percutaneous translu-minal angioplasty for limb salvage: a retrospective analysis in a single center. Acta Radiol. 2005;2:155-162.
21. Malmstedt J, Leander K, Wallberg E, et al. Outcome after leg bypass surgery for critical leg ischemia is poor inpatients with diabetes. Diab Care. 2008;31:887-892.
22. Schanzer A, Mega J, Meadows J, et al. Risk stratification in critical limb ischemia: derivation and validation of a model to predict amputation-free survival using multicenter surgical outcome data. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:1464-1471.
23. Taylor S, York J, Cull D, et al. Clinical success using patient-oriented out-come measures after lower extremitybypass and endovascular intervention for ischemic tissue loss. J Vasc Surg J. 2009;50:534-41.
24. Faglia E, Clerici G, Clerissi J, et al. When is a technically successful peripheral angioplasty effective in preventing above-the-ankle amputation in diabetic patients with critical limb ischaemia? Diab Med. 2007;24:823-829.