Symmetry, stability, and reversibility properties of idealized confined microtubule cytoskeletons

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 99, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2831-2840

  Maly, V I ^a   Maly, I V ^b  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Russian Federation)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78349283461     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.09.017     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bray, D. 2000. Cell Movements: From Molecules to Motility. Garland, New York.
2. Gotlieb, A. I., L. M. May., V. I. Kalnins. 1981. Distribution of microtubule organizing centers in migrating sheets of endothelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 91:589-594.
3. Kupfer, A., D. Louvard, and S. J. Singer. 1982. Polarization of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center in cultured fibroblasts at the edge of an experimental wound. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 79:2603-2607.
4. Ueda, M., R. Gräf., U. Euteneuer. 1997. Centrosome positioning and directionality of cell movements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:9674-9678.
5. Kupfer, A., and S. J. Singer. 1989. Cell biology of cytotoxic and helper T cell functions: immunofluorescence microscopic studies of single cells and cell couples. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 7:309-337.
6. Kupfer, H., C. R. Monks, and A. Kupfer. 1994. Small splenic B cells that bind to antigen-specific T helper (Th) cells and face the site of cytokine production in the Th cells selectively proliferate: immunofluorescence microscopic studies of Th-B antigen-presenting cell interactions. J. Exp. Med. 179:1507-1515.
7. Euteneuer, U., and M. Schliwa. 1992. Mechanism of centrosome positioning during the wound response in BSC-1 cells. J. Cell Biol. 116:1157-1166.
8. Koonce, M. P., J. Köhler., G. Gerisch. 1999. Dynein motor regulation stabilizes interphase microtubule arrays and determines centrosome position. EMBO J. 18:6786-6792.
9. Piel, M., P. Meyer., M. Bornens. 2000. The respective contributions of the mother and daughter centrioles to centrosome activity and behavior in vertebrate cells. J. Cell Biol. 149:317-330.
10. Etienne-Manneville, S., and A. Hall. 2001. Integrin-mediated activation of Cdc42 controls cell polarity in migrating astrocytes through PKCζ. Cell. 106:489-498.
11. Yvon, A. M. C., J. W. Walker., P. Wadsworth. 2002. Centrosome reorientation in wound-edge cells is cell type specific. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:1871-1880.
12. Burakov, A., E. Nadezhdina., V. Rodionov. 2003. Centrosome positioning in interphase cells. J. Cell Biol. 162:963-969.
13. Gomes, E. R., S. Jani, and G. G. Gundersen. 2005. Nuclear movement regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, myosin, and actin flow establishes MTOC polarization in migrating cells. Cell. 121:451-463.
14. Dupin, I., E. Camand, and S. Etienne-Manneville. 2009. Classical cadherins control nucleus and centrosome position and cell polarity. J. Cell Biol. 185:779-786.
15. Januschke, J., and C. Gonzalez. 2010. The interphase microtubule aster is a determinant of asymmetric division orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 188:693-706.
16. Stowers, L., D. Yelon., J. Chant. 1995. Regulation of the polarization of T cells toward antigen-presenting cells by Ras-related GTPase CDC42. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:5027-5031.
17. Lowin-Kropf, B., V. S. Shapiro, and A. Weiss. 1998. Cytoskeletal polarization of T cells is regulated by an immunoreceptor tyrosinebased activation motif-dependent mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 140:861-871.
18. Faivre-Moskalenko, C., and M. Dogterom. 2002. Dynamics of microtubule asters in microfabricated chambers: the role of catastrophes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:16788-16793.
19. Levy, J. R., and E. L. F. Holzbaur. 2008. Dynein drives nuclear rotation during forward progression of motile fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 121:3187-3195.
20. Arkhipov, S. N., and I. V. Maly. 2006. Contribution of whole-cell optimization via cell body rolling to polarization of T cells. Phys. Biol. 3:209-219.
21. Arkhipov, S. N., and I. V. Maly. 2008. Retractile processes in T lymphocyte orientation on a stimulatory substrate: morphology and dynamics. Phys. Biol. 5:016006.
22. Arkhipov, S. N., and I. V. Maly. 2006. Quantitative analysis of the role of receptor recycling in T cell polarization. Biophys. J. 91:4306-4316.
23. Arkhipov, S. N., and I. V. Maly. 2007. A model for the interplay of receptor recycling and receptor-mediated contact in T cells. PLoS ONE. 2: e633.
24. Holy, T. E. 1997. Physical aspects of the assembly and function of microtubules. Dissertation. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
25. Holy, T. E., M. Dogterom., S. Leibler. 1997. Assembly and positioning of microtubule asters in microfabricated chambers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:6228-6231.
26. Howard, J. 2006. Elastic and damping forces generated by confined arrays of dynamic microtubules. Phys. Biol. 3:54-66.
27. Baratt, A., S. N. Arkhipov, and I. V. Maly. 2008. An experimental and computational study of effects of microtubule stabilization on T-cell polarity. PLoS ONE. 3: e3861.
28. Kim, M. J., and I. V. Maly. 2009. Deterministic mechanical model of T-killer cell polarization reproduces the wandering of aim between simultaneously engaged targets. PLOS Comput. Biol. 5: e1000260.
29. Pinot, M., F. Chesnel., Z. Gueroui. 2009. Effects of confinement on the self-organization of microtubules and motors. Curr. Biol. 19:954-960.
30. Dogterom, M., and B. Yurke. 1998. Microtubule dynamics and the positioning of microtubule organizing centers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81:485-488.
31. Tran, P. T., L. Marsh., F. Chang. 2001. A mechanism for nuclear positioning in fission yeast based on microtubule pushing. J. Cell Biol. 153:397-411.
32. Rubinstein, B., K. Larripa., A. Mogilner. 2009. The elasticity of motor-microtubule bundles and shape of the mitotic spindle. Phys. Biol. 6:016005.
33. Cosentino Lagomarsino, M., C. Tanase., M. Dogterom. 2007. Microtubuleorganizationinthree-dimensional confined geometries: evaluating the role ofelasticity throughacombinedinvitro and modeling approach. Biophys. J. 92:1046-1057.
34. Tischer, C., D. Brunner, and M. Dogterom. 2009. Force-and kinesin-8-dependent effects in the spatial regulation of fission yeast microtubule dynamics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5:250.
35. Foethke, D., T. Makushok., F. Nédélec. 2009. Force-and lengthdependent catastrophe activities explain interphase microtubule organization in fission yeast. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5:241.
36. Howard, J. 1998. Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
37. Kuhn, J. R., and M. Poenie. 2002. Dynamic polarization of the microtubule cytoskeleton during CTL-mediated killing. Immunity. 16:111-121.
38. Brangwynne, C. P., F. C. MacKintosh., D. A. Weitz. 2006. Microtubules can bear enhanced compressive loads in living cells because of lateral reinforcement. J. Cell Biol. 173:733-741.
39. Gittes, F., B. Mickey., J. Howard. 1993. Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. J. Cell Biol. 120:923-934.