Computer-assisted surgery planning for complex liver resections: When is it helpful? A single-center experience over an 8-year period

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 252, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 876-882

  Radtke, Arnold ^a,d   Sotiropoulos, Georgios C ^a   Molmenti, Ernesto P ^a   Schroeder, Tobias ^b   Peitgen, Heinz O ^c   Frilling, Andrea ^a   Broering, Dieter C ^d   Broelsch, Christoph E ^a   Malagó, Massimo ^a  

^a Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery ^*  (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROTOMY; LIVER RESECTION; LIVER WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT PLANNING; VASCULAR SURGERY; ANATOMY; BACTERIAL SUPERINFECTION; BILE LEAKAGE; CANCER SURGERY; CHOLANGITIS; CHOLESTASIS; HEPATITIS; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; LIVER BIOPSY; LIVER CIRRHOSIS; LIVER PARENCHYMA; LUNG EMBOLISM; PANCREATITIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLEURA EFFUSION; PNEUMONIA; PREOPERATIVE CARE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS INFECTION; STEATOSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TWO DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WOUND INFECTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HEPATECTOMY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LIVER DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78349280794     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fdd012     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Morris-Stiff G, Tan YN, Vauthey JN. Hepatic complications following pre-operative chemotherapy with exaliplatin or irinotecan for hepatic colorectal metastases. EJSO. 2008;34:609-614.
2. Paugam-Burtz C, Janny S, Delefosse D, et al. Prospective validation of the "fifty-fifty" criteria as an early and accurate predictor of death after liver resection in intensive care. Ann Surg. 2009;249:124-128.
3. Haghighi KS, Glenn D, Gruenberger T, et al. Extending the limits for curative liverresections byportalveinembolization. Int Surg. 2009;94:43-47.
4. Schindl MJ, Redhead DN, Fearon KCH, et al. The value ofresidual liver volume as a predictor ofhepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection. Gut. 2005;54:289-296.
5. Vauthey JN, Chaoui A, Do KA, et al. Standardized measurement of the fu-ture liver remnant prior to extended liver resection: methodology and clinical associations. Surgery. 2000;127:512-519.
6. Hemming AW, Reed AI, Langham MR, et al. Hepatic vein reconstruction of hepatic tumors. Ann Surg. 2002;235:850-858.
7. Bismuth H. Surgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver. World J Surg. 1982;6:3-9.
8. Lang H, Radtke A, Liu C, et al. Improved assessment offunctional resectability inrepeatedhepatectomybycomputer- assistedriskanalysisoperationplanning. Hepato-Gastroenterol. 2005;52:1645-1646.
9. Torzilli G, Montrosi M, Del Fabbro D, et al. Ultrasonographically guided surgical approach to live tumours involving the hepatic veins close to the caval confluence. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1238-1246.
10. Marescaux J, Clément JM, Tasseti V, et al. Virtual reality applied to hepatic surgery simulation: the next revolution. Ann Surg. 1998;228:627-634.
11. Saito S, Yamanaka J, Miura K, et al. A novel 3D hepatectomy simulation based on liver circulation: application to liver resection and transplantation. Hepatology. 2005;41:1297-1304.
12. Asakuma M, Fujimoto Y, Bourquain H, et al. Graft selection algorithm based on congestion volume for adult living donor liver transplantation. Am J Trans-plant. 2007;7:1788-1796.
13. Schroeder T, Radtke A, Debatin JF, et al. Contrast-enhanced multidetector-CT cholangiography after living donor liver transplantation. HepatoGastroenterology. 2007;54:1176-1180.
14. Högemann D, Stamm G, Shin H, et al. Individual planning ofliver surgery interventions with a virtual model of the liver and its associated structures [in German]. Radiologe. 2000;40:267-273.
15. Selle D, Preim B, Schenk A, et al. Analysis of vasculature for liver surgical planning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21:1344-1357.
16. Coinaud C, Noguiera C. Les veines sus-he'patiques chez l'homme. Acta Anat. 1958;34:84-110.
17. Nakamura S, Tsuzuki T Surgical anatomy of the hepatic veins and the inferior vena cava. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;152:43-50.
18. Neumann JO, Thorn M, Fischer L, et al. Branching patterns and drainage territories of the middle hepatic vein in computer-simulated right living-donor hepatectomies. Am J Transpl. 2006;6:1407-1415.
19. D'Alessandro AM, Kalayoglu M, Sollinger HW, et al. The predictive value of donor liver biopsies for the development of primary nonfunction after orthotopic livertransplantation. Transplantation. 1991;51:157-163.
20. Kishi Y, Abdalla EK, Chun YS, et al. Three hundred and one consecutive extended right hepatectomies. Evaluation of outcome based on systematic liver volumetry Ann Surg. 2009;250:540-548.
21. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205-213.
22. Torzilli G, Procopio F, Cimino M, et al. Anatomical segmental and subseg-mental resection of the liver for hepatocellular carcinoma. A new approach by means ofultrasound-guided vessel compression. Ann Surg. 2010;251: 229-235.
23. Torzilli G, Palmisano A, Procopio F, et al. A new systematic small for size re-section for liver tumors invading the middle hepatic vein at its caval confluence. Mini-mesohepatectomy Ann Surg. 2010;251:33-39.
24. Heinemann A, Wichhusen F, Puschel K, et al. Standard liver volume in the Caucasianpopulation. Liver Transpl Surg. 1999;5:366-368.
25. Lamadé W, Glombitza G, Fischer L, et al. The impact of3-dimensional re-construction on operation planning in liver surgery Arch Surg. 2002;135: 1256-1261.
26. Abdalla EK, Denys A, Chevalier P, et al. Total and segmental liver volume variations: implications for liver surgery: Surgery. 2004;135:404-410.
27. Fasel JHD, Selle D, Evertsz CJG, et al. Segmental anatomy of the liver: poor correlation with CT Radiology. 1998;206;151-156.
28. Sano K, Makuuchi M, Miki K, et al. Evaluation ofhepatic venous conges-tion: proposed indication criteria for hepatic vein reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2002;236:241-247.
29. Molmenti EP, Radtke A, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Anatomy and physiology of the liver. In: Shackelford's Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2007; 1602.
30. Kaneko T, Kaneko K, Sugimoto H, et al. Intrahepatic anastomosis formation between the hepatic veins in the graft liver of the living related liver trans-plantation: observationby Dopplerultrasonography Transplantation. 2000;70: 982-985.