Fabricating toe prostheses using 3-D modeling technique: Case report;3-Boyutlu modelleme tekniǧi kullanarak ayak başparmaǧı protezi yapımı

Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1750-1755

  Kocacikli, Mustafa ^a   Korkmaz, Fatih Mehmet ^b   Yazicioǧlu, Hüseyin ^a   Yaluǧ, Suat ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Computer aided design; Imaging; Prosthesis design; Three dimensional; Toes

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; CYANOACRYLATE; POLYSILOXANE; SILICON;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIGITAL IMAGING; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOE PROSTHESIS;

EID: 78349274050     PISSN: 13000292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5336/medsci.2008-9248     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Alison A, Allen R, Cerullo L, Erb RA, Gion GG, Habakuk SW, et al. Digital prostheses. In: Mc. Kinstry RE, ed. Fundamentals of Facial Prosthetics. 1st ed. Arlington: ABI Professional Publications; 1995. p. 181-92.
2. Pillet J. Esthetic hand prostheses. J Hand Surg Am 1983;8(5 Pt 2):778-81.
3. Markal Ertaş N, Çelebioǧlu S. [The treatment of complicated digital defects by cross-finger adipofascial flap]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2004;24(2):153-8.
4. Pilley MJ, Quinton DN. Digital prostheses for single finger amputations. J Hand Surg Br 1999;24(5):539-41.
5. Hopper RA, Griffiths S, Murray J, Manktelow RT. Factors influencing use of digital prostheses in workers1 compensation recipients. J Hand Surg Am 2000;25(1):80-5.
6. Pereira BP, Kour AK, Leow EL, Pho RW. Benefits and use of digital prostheses. J Hand Surg Am 1996;21(2):222-8.
7. Alison A, Mackinnon SE. Evaluation of digital prostheses. J Hand Surg Am 1992;17(5):923-6.
8. Lifchez SD, Marchant-Hanson J, Matloub HS, Sanger JR, Dzwierzynski WW, Nguyen HH. Functional improvement with digital prosthesis use after multiple digit amputations. J Hand Surg Am 2005;30(4):790-4.
9. Scolozzi P, Jaques B. Treatment of midfacial defects using prostheses supported by ITI dental implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(6):1395-404.
10. Aydin C, Karakoca S, Yilmaz H. Implant-retained digital prostheses with custom-designed attachments: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97(4):191-5.
11. Manurangsee P, Isariyawut C, Chatuthong V, Mekraksawanit S. Osseointegrated finger prosthesis: An alternative method for finger reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 2000;25(1):86-92.
12. Kiat-Amnuay S, Gettleman L, Khan Z, Goldsmith LJ. Effect of adhesive retention of maxillofacial prostheses. Part 2: Time and reapplication effects. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85 (5):438-41.
13. Lemon JC, Chambers MS, Wesley PJ, Martin JW. Technique for fabricating a mirror-image prosthetic ear. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75(3): 292-3.
14. Penkner K, Santler G, Mayer W, Pierer G, Lo- renzoni M. Fabricating auricular prostheses using three-dimensional soft tissue models. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82(4):482-4.
15. Al Mardini M, Ercoli C, Graser GN. A technique to produce a mirror-image wax pattern of an ear using rapid prototyping technology. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94(2):195-8.
16. Ciocca L, Scotti R. CAD-CAM generated ear cast by means of a laser scanner and rapid prototyping machine. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92(6):591-5.
17. Coward TJ, Watson RM, Wilkinson IC. Fabrication of a wax ear by rapid-process modeling using stereolithography. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12(1):20-7.
18. Reitemeier B, Notni G, Heinze M, Schöne C, Schmidt A, Fichtner D. Optical modelling of extraoral defects. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91(1): 80-4.
19. Cheah CM, Chua CK, Tan KH, Teo CK. Integration of laser surface digitizing with CAD/ CAM techniques for developing facial prostheses. Part 1: Design and fabrication of prosthesis replicas. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16(4): 435-41.