Re: Gestational sac volume: Comparison between SonoAVC and VOCAL measurements at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 648-649

  Sur, S ^a   Marsh, A ^a   Campbell, B ^a   Raine Fenning, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EMBRYO; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 78349266899     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.8833     Document Type: Letter

References (12)

1. Borenstein M, Azumendi Perez G, Molina Garcia F, Romero M, Anderica J, Gestational sac volume: comparison between SonoAVC and VOCAL measurements at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 510 - 514.
2. Raine-Fenning N, Clewes J, Kendall N, Bunkheila A, Campbell B, Johnson I, The interobserver reliability and validity of volume calculation from three-dimensional ultrasound datasets in the in vitro setting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 283 - 291.
3. Cheong K, Leung K, Chan H, Lee Y, Yang F, Tang M, Comparison of inter- and intraobserver agreement between three types of fetal volume measurement technique (XI VOCAL, VOCAL and multiplanar). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 287 - 294.
4. Anderson N, Jolley I, Wells J, Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: comparison of bias, precision and consistency using 12 different formulae. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 173 - 179.
5. Kusanovic J, Nien J, Gonçalves L, Espinoza J, Lee W, Balasubramaniam M, Soto E, Erez O, Romero R, The use of inversion mode and 3D manual segmentation in volume measurement of fetal fluid-filled structures: comparison with Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 177 - 186.
6. Sur S, Jayaprakasan K, Jones N, Clewes J, Winter B, Cash N, Campbell B, Raine-Fenning N, A novel technique for the semi-automated measurement of embryo volume: an intraobserver reliability study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 36: 719 - 725.
7. Rousian M, Verwoerd-Dikkeboom C, Koning A, Hop W, van der Spek P, Exalto N, Steegers E, Early pregnancy volume measurements: validation of ultrasound techniques and new perspectives. BJOG 2009; 116: 278 - 285.
8. Raine-Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Clewes J, Joergner I, Bonaki S, Chamberlain S, Devlin L, Priddle H, Johnson I, SonoAVC: a novel method of automatic volume calculation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 691 - 696.
9. Deutch T, Joergner I, Matson D, Oehninger S, Bocca S, Hoenigmann D, Abuhamad A, Automated assessment of ovarian follicles using a novel three-dimensional ultrasound software. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1562 - 1568.
10. Salama S, Arbo E, Lamazou F, Levailllant J, Frydman R, Fanchin R, Reproducibility and reliability of automated volumetric measurement of single preovulatory follicles using SonoAVC. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 2069 - 2073.
11. Rizzo G, Capponi A, Pietrolucci M, Arduini D, Sonographic automated volume count (SonoAVC) in volume measurement of fetal fluid-filled structures: comparison with Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 111 - 112.
12. Raine-Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Clewes J, Automated follicle tracking facilitates standardization and may improve work flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 1015 - 1018.