Effect of static magnetic fields on the budding of yeast cells

Bioelectromagnetics

Volumn 31, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 622-629

  Egami, Shigeki ^a   Naruse, Yujiro ^a,b   Watarai, Hitoshi ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOSHIBA CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Budding angle; Homogeneous magnetic field; Inhomogeneous magnetic field; Magnetic circuit

Indexed keywords

CELLS; CYTOLOGY; MAGNETIC FIELDS; SILICA; TIMING CIRCUITS; YEAST;

BUDDING ANGLE; CELL-BE; CELL/B.E; CELL/BE; HOMOGENEOUS MAGNETIC FIELD; INHOMOGENEOUS MAGNETIC FIELD; STATIC MAGNETIC FIELDS; STRONG MAGNETIC FIELDS; YEAST CELL;

MAGNETIC CIRCUITS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

ARTICLE; CYTOLOGY; LIGHT RELATED PHENOMENA; MAGNETISM; MICROSCOPY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

MAGNETICS; MICROSCOPY; OPTICAL PROCESSES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 78349258898     PISSN: 01978462     EISSN: 1521186X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20599     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Arase M, Suwa M, Watarai H. 2006. Magnetophoretic velocity modulation mass analysis of a single microparticle in atmosphere. Anal Chem 78(18): 6660-6663.
2. Binninger DM, Ungvichian V. 1997. Effects of 60 Hz AC magnetic fields on gene expression following exposure over multiple cell generations using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 43(1): 83-89.
3. Bowman JD, Thomas DC, London SJ, Peters JM. 1995. Hypothesis: The risk of childhood leukemia is related to combinations of power-frequency and static magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 16(1): 48-59.
4. Bras W, Diakun GP, Diaz JF, Maret G, Kramer H, Bordas J, Medrano J. 1998. The susceptibility of pure pubulin to high magnetic fields: A magnetic birefringence and X-ray fiber diffraction study. Biophys J 74(3): 1509-1521.
5. Byers B, Goetsch L. 1975. Behavior of spindles and spindle plaques in the cell cycle and conjugation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 124(1): 511-523.
6. Coleman CB, Gonzalez-Villalobos RA, Allen PL, Johanson K, Guevorkian K, Valles JM, Hammond TG. 2007. Diamagnetic levitation changes growth, cell cycle, and gene expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 98(4): 854-863.
7. Desjobert H, Hillion J, Adolphe M, Averlant G, Nafziger J. 1995. Effects of 50 Hz magnetic fields on C-myc transcript levels in nonsynchronized and synchronized human cells. Bioelectromagnetics 16(5): 277-283.
8. Dubey N, Letourneau PC, Tranquillo RT. 1999. Guided neurite elongation and Schwann cell invasion into magnetically aligned collagen in simulated peripheral nerve regeneration. Exper Neurol 158(2): 338-350.
9. Egami S, Watarai H. 2009. Magnetic susceptibility measurement of a microdroplet interface using a magnetic circuit. Analyst 134(2): 278-282.
10. Egami S, Watarai H. 2010. Polarization analysis of microscopic Faraday rotation of thin solid ferrocene aggregates. J Phys Chem B 114(14): 4770-4776.
11. Egami S, Monjushiro H, Watarai H. 2006. Magnetic susceptibility measurements of solutions by surface nanodisplacement detection. Anal Sci 22(9): 1157-1162.
12. Emura R, Ashida N, Higashi T, Takeuchi T. 2001. Orientation of bull sperms in static magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 22(1): 60-65.
13. Emura R, Takeuchi T, Nakaoka Y, Higashi T. 2003. Analysis of anisotropic diamagnetic susceptibility of a bull sperm. Bioelectromagnetics 24(5): 347-355.
14. Higashi T, Ashida N, Takeuchi T. 1997. Orientation of blood cells in static magnetic field. Physica B 237-238: 616-620.
15. Hirota N, Nakagawa J, Kitazawa K. 1999. Effects of a magnetic field on the germination of plants. J Appl Phys 85(8): 5717-5719.
16. Horiuchi S, Ishizaki Y, Okuno K, Ano T, Shoda M. 2001. Drastic high magnetic field effect on suppression of Escherichia coli. Bioelectrochemistry 53(2): 149-153.
17. Ikehata M, Koana T, Suzuki Y, Shimizu H, Nakagawa M. 1999. Mutagenicity and co-mutagenicity of static magnetic fields detected by bacterial mutation assay. Mutat Res 427(2): 147-156.
18. Ikehata M, Iwasaka M, Miyakoshi J, Ueno S, Koana T. 2003. Effects of intense magnetic fields on sedimentation pattern and gene expression profile in budding yeast. J Appl Phys 93(10): 6724-6726.
19. Iwasaka M, Ikehata M, Miyakoshi J, Ueno S. 2004. Strong static magnetic field effects on yeast proliferation and distribution. Bioelectrochemistry 65(1): 59-68.
20. Kato M, Honma KI, Shigemitsu T, Shiga Y. 1993. Effects of exposure to a circularly polarized 50-Hz magnetic field on plasma and pineal melatonin levels in rats. Bioelectromagnetics 14(2): 97-106.
21. Kuznetsov OA, Hasenstein KH. 1996. Intracellular magnetophoresis of amyloplasts and induction of root curvature. Planta 198(1): 87-94.
22. Lyle DB, Wang X, Ayotte RD, Sheppard AR, Adey WR. 1991. Calcium uptake by leukemic and normal T-lymphocytes exposed to low frequency magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 12(3): 145-156.
23. Malko JA, Constantinidis I, Dillehay D, Fajman WA. 1994. Search for influence of 1.5 Tesla magnetic field on growth of yeast cells. Bioelectromagnetics 15(6): 495-501.
24. Nakamura K, Okuno K, Ano T, Shoda M. 1997. Effect of high magnetic field on the growth of Bacillus subtilis measured in a newly developed superconducting magnet biosystem. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 43(1): 123-128.
25. +] "prions" that are crosstransmissible and susceptible beyond a species barrier through a quasi-prion state. Mol Cell 7(6): 1121-1130.
26. Novák J, Strašák L, Fojt L, Slaninová I, Vetterl V. 2007. Effects of low-frequency magnetic fields on the viability of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioelectrochemistry 70(1): 115-121.
27. Okazaki M, Maeda N, Shiga T. 1987. Effects of an inhomogeneous magnetic field on flowing erythrocytes. Eur Biophys J 14(3): 139-145.
28. Reiter RJ, Richardson BA. 1992. Magnetic field effects on pineal indoleamine metabolism and possible biological consequences. FASEB J 6(6): 2283-2287.
29. Ruiz-Gómez MJ, Prieto-Barcia MI, Ristori-Bogajo E, Martínez-Morillo M. 2004. Static and 50 Hz magnetic fields of 0.35 T and 2.45 mT have no effect on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioelectrochemistry 64(2): 151-155.
30. Takeuchi T, Nakaoka Y, Emura R, Higashi T. 2002. Diamagnetic orientation of bull sperms and related materials in static magnetic fields. J Phys Soc Jpn 71(1): 363-368.
31. Tamaki H, Yun C, Mizutani T, Tsuzuki T, Takagi Y, Shinozaki M, Kodama Y, Shirahige K, Kumagai H. 2005. Glucose-dependent cell size is regulated by a G protein-coupled receptor system in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Cells 10(3): 193-206.
32. Tranquillo RT, Girton TS, Bromberek BA, Triebes TG, Mooradian DL. 1996. Magnetically orientated tissue-equivalent tubes: Application to a circumferentially orientated media-equivalent. Biomaterials 17(3): 349-357.
33. Tsuchiya K, Nakamura K, Okuno K, Ano T, Shoda M. 1996. Effect of homogeneous and inhomogeneous high magnetic fields on the growth of Escherichia coli. J Ferment Bioeng 81(4): 343-346.
34. Ueno S, Tashiro T, Harada K. 1988. Localized stimulation of neutral tissues in the brain by means of a paired configuration of time-varying magnetic fields. J Appl Phys 64(10): 5862-5864.
35. Ueno S, Iwasaka M, Shiokawa K. 1994. Early embryonic development of frogs under intense magnetic fields up to 8 T. J Appl Phys 75(10): 7165-7167.
36. Watarai H, Suwa M, Iiguni Y. 2004. Magnetophoresis and electromagnetophoresis of microparticles in liquids. Anal Bioanal Chem 387(7): 1693-1699.
37. Yamagishi A, Takeuchi T, Higashi T, Date M. 1989. Diamagnetic orientation of polymerized molecules under high magnetic field. J Phys Soc Jpn 58(7): 2280-2283.
38. Yamagishi A, Takeuchi T, Higashi T, Date M. 1992. Diamagnetic orientation of blood cells in high magnetic field. Physica B 177(1-4): 523-526.