Temporal Predictability Facilitates Causal Learning

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 139, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 756-771

  Greville, W James ^a   Buehner, Marc J ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Causality; Contiguity; Learning; Predictability; Time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; TIME PERCEPTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78349258177     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020976     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allan L.G., Tangen J.M., Wood R., Shah T. Temporal contiguity and contingency judgments: A Pavlovian analogue. Integrative Psychological and Behavior Science 2003, 38:214-229.
2. Andrzejewski M.E., Cardinal C.D., Field D.P., Flannery B.A., Johnson M., Bailey K., Hineline P.N. Pigeons' choices between fixed-interval and random-interval schedules: Utility of variability?. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 2005, 83:129-145. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.30-04.
3. Blaisdell A.P., Denniston J.C., Miller R.R. Temporal encoding as a determinant of overshadowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1998, 24:72-83. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.24.1.72.
4. Blaisdell A.P., Sawa K., Leising K.J., Waldmann M.R. Causal reasoning in rats. Science 2006, February 17, 311:1020-1022. doi: 10.1126/science.1121872.
5. Buehner M.J. Contiguity and covariation in human causal inference. Learning and Behavior 2005, 33:230-238.
6. Buehner M.J., Cheng P.W., Clifford D. From covariation to causation: A test of the assumption of causal power. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:1119-1140. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1119.
7. Buehner M.J., May J. Knowledge mediates the timeframe of covariation assessment in human causal induction. Thinking and Reasoning 2002, 8:269-295. doi: 10.1080/13546780244000060.
8. Buehner M.J., May J. Rethinking temporal contiguity and the judgement of causality: Effects of prior knowledge, experience, and reinforcement procedure. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2003, 56A(5):865-890.
9. Buehner M.J., May J. Abolishing the effect of reinforcement delay on human causal learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 57B(2):179-191.
10. Buehner M.J., McGregor S. Temporal delays can facilitate causal attribution: Towards a general timeframe bias in causal induction. Thinking and Reasoning 2006, 12:353-378. doi: 10.1080/13546780500368965.
11. Buehner M.J., McGregor S.J. Contingency and contiguity trade-offs in causal induction. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 2009, 22:19-42.
12. Cheng P.W. From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review 1997, 104:367-405. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.367.
13. Chung S.-H. Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1965, 8:439-444.
14. Cicerone R.A. Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1976, 25:257-261. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-257.
15. Damianopoulos E.N. Necessary and sufficient factors in classical conditioning. Integrative Physiological and Behavior Science 1982, 17:215-229.
16. Denniston J.C., Blaisdell A.P., Miller R.R. Temporal coding affects transfer of serial and simultaneous inhibitors. Animal Learning & Behavior 1998, 26:336-350.
17. Dickinson A. Causal learning: An associative analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2001, 54(B):3-25.
18. Dickinson A., Shanks D., Evenden J. Judgement of act-outcome contingency: The role of selective attribution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 1984, 36(1-A):29-50.
19. D'Zurilla T.J., Maydeu-Olivares A., Kant G.L. Age and gender differences in social problem-solving ability. Personality and Individual Differences 1998, 25:241-252. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00029-4.
20. Einhorn H.J., Hogarth R.M. Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin 1986, 99:3-19. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.3.
21. Evans A.S. Causation and disease: A chronological journey 1993, Plenum Medical Book Company, New York, NY.
22. Gluck M.A., Mercado E., Myers C.E. Learning and memory: From brain to behaviour 2008, Worth Publishers, New York, NY.
23. Goode M.K., Geraci L., Roediger H.L. Superiority of variable to repeated practice in transfer on anagram solution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:662-666. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.3.662.
24. Green L., Myerson J. Exponential versus hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: Risk and waiting time. American Zoologist 1996, 36:496-505.
25. Greville W.J., Buehner M.J. The influence of temporal distributions on causal induction from tabular data. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:444-453.
26. Greville, W. J., Cassar, A., Johansen, M. K., & Buehner, M. J. (2010, August). Structure awareness in action-outcome learning eradicates the detrimental effect of reinforcement delays. Poster presented at the 2010 meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
27. Griffiths T.L., Tenenbaum J.B. Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology 2005, 51:334-384. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.05.004.
28. Griffiths T.L., Tenenbaum J.B. Theory-based causal induction. Psychological Review 2009, 116:661-716. doi: 10.1037/a0017201.
29. Hall G., Pearce J.M. Latent inhibition of a CS during CS-US pairings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1979, 5:31-42. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.5.1.31.
30. Hammond L.J., Paynter W.E. Probabilistic contingency theories of animal conditioning: A critical analysis. Learning and Motivation 1983, 14:527-550.
31. Hume, D. (1888). Hume's treatise of human nature (L. A. Selby-Bigge, Ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1739).
32. Humphreys G.R., Buehner M.J. Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:1542-1549. doi: 10.1037/a0014492.
33. Jenkins H., Ward W. Judgment of contingencies between responses and outcomes. Psychological Monographs 1965, 7:1-17.
34. Lagnado D.A., Sloman S.A. Learning causal structure. Proceedings of the twenty-fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2002, 560-565. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
35. Lagnado D.A., Waldmann M.R., Hagmayer Y., Sloman S.A. Beyond covariation: Cues to causal structure. Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation 2007, 154-172. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. A. Gopnik, L. Schulz (Eds.).
36. Mackintosh N.J. Conditioning and associative learning 1983, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
37. Miller R.R., Barnet R.C. The role of time in elementary associations. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1993, 2:106-111. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772577.
38. Myerson J., Green L. Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1995, 64:263-276. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-263.
39. Pearce J.M., Hall G. A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review 1980, 87:532-552. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.532.
40. Perales J.C., Shanks D.R. Models of covariation-based causal judgment: A review and synthesis. Psychonomic Bulletiin & Review 2007, 14:577-596.
41. Reed P. Influence of the schedule of outcome presentation on causality judgements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1993, 46A(2):327-345.
42. Rescorla R.A. Pavlovian conditioning: It's not what you think it is. American Psychologist 1988, 43:151-160. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.43.3.151.
43. Rescorla R.A., Wagner A.R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research 1972, 64-99. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NY. A.H. Black, W.F. Prokasy (Eds.).
44. Savastano H.I., Yin H., Barnet R.C., Miller R.R. Temporal coding in Pavlovian conditioning: Hall-Pearce negative transfer. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1998, 51B(2):139-153.
45. Schmidt R.A. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review 1975, 82:225-260. doi: 10.1037/h0076770.
46. Shanks D.R. Acquisition functions in contingency judgment. Learning and Motivation 1987, 18:147-166.
47. Shanks D.R., Dickinson A. Associative accounts of causality judgment. Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory 1987, 21:229-261. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. G.H. Bower (Ed.).
48. Shanks D.R., Dickinson A. Instrumental judgment and performance under variations in action outcome contingency and contiguity. Memory & Cognition 1991, 19:353-360.
49. Shanks D.R., Holyoak K.J., Medin D.L. The psychology of learning and motivation Causal learning 1996, 34. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
50. Shanks D.R., Pearson S.M., Dickinson A. Temporal contiguity and the judgment of causality by human subjects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1989, 41B(2):139-159.
51. Waldmann M.R., Holyoak K.J. Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:222-236. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.2.222.
52. Wasserman E.A., Chatlosh D.L., Neunaber D.J. Perception of causal relations in humans. Learning and Motivation 1983, 14:406-432. doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(83)90025-5.
53. Wearden J.H. Do humans possess an internal clock with scalar timing properties?. Learning and Motivation 1991, 22:59-83. doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(91)90017-3.
54. Wulf G., Schmidt R.A. Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1997, 23:987-1006. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.987.
55. Young M.E., Nguyen N. The problem of delayed causation in a video game: Constant, varied, and filled delays. Learning and Motivation 2009, 40:298-312. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2009.02.002.