Meiotic behavior of wild, synthetic and cultivated wheats

Cytologia

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 169-175

  Arabbeigi, Mahbube ^a   Arzani, Ahmad ^a   Saeidi, Ghodratollah ^a  

^a ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Chromosome bridges; Laggard; Meiotic index; Micronuclei; Synthetic wheat; Wild relatives

Indexed keywords

AEGILOPS TAUSCHII X TRITICUM TURGIDUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 78349255036     PISSN: 00114545     EISSN: 00114545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1508/cytologia.75.169     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arzani, A., Khalighi, M. R. Shiran, B. and Kharazian, N. 2005. Evaluation of diversity in wild relatives of wheat. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 41: 110-116.
2. Bass, H. W, Riera-Lizarazu, O., Ananiev, E. V., Bordoli, S. J., Rines, H., Rines, W., Phillips, R. L., Sedat, J. W, Agard, D. A. and Cande, W. Z. 2000. Evidence for the coincident initiation of homolog pairing and synapsis during the telomere clustering (bouquet) stage of meiotic prophase. J. Cell Sci. 113: 1033-1042.
3. Bione, N. C. P., Pagliarini, M. S. and Toledo, J. F. F. 2000. Meiotic behavior of several Brazilian soybean varieties. Genet. Mol. Biol. 23: 623-631.
4. Bodanese-Zanettini, M. H., Moraes-Fernandes, M. B. and Salzano, F. M. 1983. Genetic and environmental effects on the frequency of meiotic disturbances in wheat. Rev. Brasil. Genet. 1:43-57.
5. Caetano-Pereira, C. M., Pagliarini, M. S., Brasil, E. M. and Martins, E. N. 1995. Influence of aluminium in causing chromosome stickiness in maize microsporocytes. Maydica 40: 325-333.
6. Chaubey, N. K. and Khanna, V. K. 1988. Meiotic studies of wheat, rye and 42-chromoaome-Triticales. Biol. Plant. 30: 152-154.
7. Cnudde, F. and Gerats, T. 2005. Meiosis: Inducing variation by reduction. Plant Biol. 7: 321-341.
8. Consolara, M. E. L., Pagliariniand, M. S. and Chaves, L. J. 1996. Meiotic behavior, pollen fertility and seed production in Brazilian populations of Centella asiatica (L.) Urban (Umbelliferae). Cytologia 61: 375-381.
9. Del Blanco, I. A., Rajaram, S. and Kronstad, W. E. 2001. Agronomic potential of synthetic hexaploid wheat-derived populations. Crop Sei. 41: 670-676.
10. Ecochard, R. 1961. The cytogenetic bases of interogression in wheat. Euphytica 10: 363-367.
11. Jauhar, P. P. 1992. Chromosome pairing in hybrids between hexaploid bread wheat and tetraploid crested wheatgrass (Agropyrm mistaturn). Hereditas 116: 107-109.
12. Koduru, P. R. K. and Rao, M. K. 1981. Cytogenetics of synaptic mutants in higher plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 59: 197-214.
13. Line, G., Friebe, B. R., Kynast, R. G., Molnar-Lang, M., Koszegi, B., Sutka, J. and Gill, B. S. 1999. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of Aegilops cylindrica Host. Genome 42:497-503.
14. Love, R. M. 1949. Estudos Citoloâgicos Preliminares de Trigos Rio-Grandenses. Secretaria de Estado dos Negoâcios da Agricultura, Induâstria e Comeârcio, Porto Alegre, p 23. (Circular, 74).
15. - 1950. Varietal differences in meiotic chromosome behavior of brazilian wheats. Agron. J. 43: 72-76.
16. Maestra, B., De Jong, J. H., Shepherd, K. and Naranjo, T. 2002. Chromosome arrangement and behaviour of two rye telosomes at the onset of meiosis in disomic wheat-5RL addition lines with and without the PhI locus. Chromosome Res. 10: 655-667.
17. Mendes-Bonata, A. B., Pascotto, C. R., Pagliarini, M. S. and Valle, C. B. 2006. Chromosome number and meiotic behaviour in Brachiaria jubata (Gramineae). J. Genet. 85: 83-87.
18. Felismino, M. F., Pascotto, C. R., Souza Kaneshima, A. M., Pessim, C., Calisto, V, Pagliarini, M. S. and Valle, C. B. 2009. Abnormal meiosis in tetraploid genotypes of Brachiaria brizantha (Poaceae) induced by colchicine: its implications for breeding. J. Appl. Genet. 50: 83-87.
19. Moss, J. M. and Murray, B. G. 1990. The three-dimensional arrangement of chromosomes at meiotic metaphase I in normal and interchange heterozygotes of Briza humilis. J. Cell Sci. 97: 565-570.
20. Mujeeb-Kazi, A., Gul, A., Farooq, M., Rizwan, S. and Ahmad, I. 2008. Rebirth of synthetic hexaploids with global implications for wheat improvement. Aust. J. Agrie. Res. 59: 391-398.
21. Myers, W. M. and Power, L. 1938. Meiotic instability as an inherited character in varieties of Triticum aestivum. J. Agric. Res. 56:441-452.
22. Naranjo, T. 1995. Chromosome structure oí Triticum longissimum relative to wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 105-109.
23. Nirmala, A. and Rao, P. N. 1996. Genetics of chromosome numerical mosaism in higher plants. Nucleus 39: 151-175.
24. Pagliarini, M. S. 2000. Meiotic behavior of economically important plant species: the relationship between fertility and male sterility. Genet. Mol. Biol. 23: 997-1002.
25. Pereira, M. A. S. 1992. Meiotic studies in Pilocarpus pennatifolius Lem. (Rutaceae). Cytologia 57: 231-235.
26. Schneider, A., Moinar, L. and Lang, M. 2008. Utilisation of Aegilops (goatgrass) species to widen the genetic diversity of cultivated wheat. Euphytica 163: 1-19.
27. Singh, R. J. 2003. Plant Cytogenetics. 2nd Ed., CRC Press, Baca, Raton, Florida.
28. Stoinova, J., Tsvetkov, K. and Tsvetkov, S. 2006. Cytological investigation of winter two-rowed barley cv. Castor, the first Bulgarian cultivar of high cold resistance. Barley Genet. Newsl. 36: 6-9.
29. Watanabe, Y. 1962. Meiotic irregularities in intervarietal hybrids of common wheat. Wheat Inf. Serv. 14: 5-7.