Quantifying focal mechanism heterogeneity for fault zones in central and southern California

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 183, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 433-450

  Bailey, Iain W ^a   Ben Zion, Yehuda ^a   Becker, Thorsten W ^a   Holschneider, Matthias ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dynamics: seismotectonics; Earthquake dynamics; Earthquake source observations; Fractures and faults; Seismicity and tectonics; Statistical seismology

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE DYNAMICS; EARTHQUAKE SOURCE OBSERVATIONS; SEISMICITY AND TECTONICS; SEISMOTECTONICS; STATISTICAL SEISMOLOGY;

EARTHQUAKES; FOCUSING; FRACTURE; STATISTICAL METHODS; TECTONICS; TENSORS;

DYNAMICS;

ASYMMETRY; EARTHQUAKE; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; FAULT ZONE; FAULTING; FOCAL MECHANISM; GEOSTATISTICS; HETEROGENEITY; SEISMIC SOURCE; SEISMICITY; SEISMOLOGY; SEISMOTECTONICS; SKEWNESS;

CALIFORNIA; SAN JACINTO FAULT ZONE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78349253898     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04745.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Amelung, F. & King, G., 1997. Large-scale tectonic deformation inferred from small earthquakes, Nature, 386, 702-705.
2. Ando, R., Shaw, B.E. & Scholz, C.H., 2009. Quantifying natural fault geometry: statistics of splay fault angles, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 99(1), 389-395.
3. Bailey, I.W., 2009. Heterogeneity of earthquake stress drops, focal mechanisms and active fault zones, PhD thesis University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
4. Bailey, I.W. & Ben-Zion, Y., 2009. Statistics of earthquake stress drops on a heterogeneous fault in an elastic half-space, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 99(3), 1786-1800,.
5. Bailey, I.W., Becker, T.W. & Ben-Zion, Y., 2009. Patterns of coseismic strain computed from southern California focal mechanisms, Geophys. J. Int., 177, 1015-1036, doi:.
6. Ben-Zion, Y., 2008. Collective behavior of earthquakes and faults: continuum-discrete transitions, progressive evolutionary changes and different dynamic regimes, Rev. Geophys., 46, RG4006, doi:.
7. Ben-Zion, Y. & Rice, J.R., 1995. Slip patterns and earthquake populations along different classes of faults in elastic solids, J. geophys. Res., 100, 12959-12983.
8. Ben-Zion, Y. & Sammis, C.G., 2003. Characterization of fault zones, Pure appl. Geophys., 160, 677-715.
9. Ben-Zion, Y., Eneva, M. & Liu, Y., 2003. Large earthquake cycles and intermittent criticality on heterogeneous faults due to evolving stress and seismicity, J. geophys. Res., 108(B6), 2307-2328, doi:.
10. Broberg, K.B., 1999. Cracks and Fracture, Academic Press, San Diego, California.
11. California Geological Survey & U.S. Geological Survey, 2010. Quaternary fault and fold database for the United States, Available at: (accessed 2010 January).
12. DeMets, C., Gordon, R.G., Argus, D.F. & Stein, S., 1994. Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21(20), 2191-2194.
13. Dieterich, J.H. & Smith, D.E., 2009. Non-planar faults: mechanics of slip and off-fault damage, Pure appl. Geophys., 166(10-11), 1799-1815, doi:.
14. Felzer, K.R. & Beroza, G.C., 1999. Deep structure of a fault discontinuity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26(14), 2121-2124.
15. Fischer, K.M. & Jordan, T.H., 1991. Seismic strain rate and deep slab deformation in Tonga, J. geophys. Res., 96, 14429-14444.
16. Fisher, N.I., 1993. Statistical Analysis of Circular Data, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, New York.
17. Frohlich, C., 1992. Triangle diagrams: ternary graphs to display similarity and diversity of earthquake focal mechanisms, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 75(1-3), 193-198.
18. Frohlich, C. & Apperson, K.D., 1992. Earthquake focal mechanisms, moment tensors, and the consistency of seismic activity near plate boundaries, Tectonics, 11(2), 279-296.
19. Hardebeck, J.L., 2006. Homogeneity of small-scale earthquake faulting, stress, and fault strength, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 96(5), 1675-1688.
20. Hardebeck, J.L. & Hauksson, E., 2001. Crustal stress field in southern California and its implications for fault mechanics, J. geophys. Res., 106(B10), 21859-21882.
21. Hardebeck, J.L. & Shearer, P.M., 2002. A new method for determining first-motion focal mechanisms, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 92, 2264-2276.
22. Hardebeck, J.L., Shearer, P.M. & Hauksson, E., 2005. A new earthquake focal mechanism catalog for southern California, in 2005 SCEC Annual Meeting Abstracts, p. 130, Southern California Earthquake Center. (accessed 2008 July).
23. Hillers, G., Ben-Zion, Y. & Mai, P.M., 2006. Seismicity on a fault controlled by rate-and state-dependent friction with spatial variations of the critical slip distance, J. geophys. Res., 111(B01403), doi:.
24. Hillers, G., Mai, P.M., Ben-Zion, Y. & Ampuero, J.-P., 2007. Statistical properties of seismicity of fault zones at different evolutionary stages, Geophys. J. Int., 169(19), 515-533, doi:.
25. Julian, B.R., Miller, A.D. & Foulger, G.R., 1998. Non-double-couple earthquakes 1. Theory, Rev. Geophys., 36, 525-550, doi:.
26. Kagan, Y.Y., 1990. Random stress and earthquake statistics: spatial dependence, Geophys. J. Int., 102, 573-583.
27. Kagan, Y.Y., 1991. 3-D rotation of double-couple earthquake sources, Geophys. J. Int., 106, 709-716.
28. Kagan, Y.Y., 2005. Double-couple earthquake focal mechanism: random rotation and display, Geophys. J. Int., 163, 1065-1072, doi:.
29. Kagan, Y.Y., 2009. On geometric complexity of earthquake focal zone and fault system: A statistical study, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 173, 254-268, doi:.
30. Kilb, D. & Hardebeck, J.L., 2006. Fault parameter constraints using relocated earthquakes: a validation of first-motion focal-mechanism data, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 96, 1140-1158.
31. King, G.C.P., 1983. The accommodation of large strains in the upper lithosphere of the earth and other solids by self-similar fault systems: the geometrical origin of b-value, Pure appl. Geophys., 121(5), 761-815.
32. King, G.C.P. & Nábělek, J., 1985. The role of bends in faults in the initiation and termination of earthquake rupture, Science, 228, 984-987.
33. Knopoff, L. & Randall, M.J., 1970. The compensated linear vector dipole: a possible mechanism for deep earthquakes, J. geophys. Res., 75, 4957-4963.
34. Kostrov, B.V., 1974. Seismic moment and energy of earthquakes and seismic flow of rock, Phys. Solid Earth, 1, 23-40.
35. Lin, G., Shearer, P.M. & Hauksson, E., 2007. Applying a three-dimensional velocity model, waveform cross correlation, and cluster analysis to locate southern California seismicity from 1981 to 2005, J. geophys. Res., 112(B12309), doi:.
36. Mardia, K.V. & Jupp, P.E., 1999. Directional Statistics, 2nd edn, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
37. McKenzie, D.P., 1969. The relation between fault plane solutions for earthquakes and the directions of the principal stresses, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 59(2), 591-601.
38. Meade, B.J. & Hager, B.H., 2005. Block models of crustal motion in southern California constrained by GPS measurements, J. geophys. Res., 110, doi:.
39. Michael, A.J., 1987. Use of focal mechanisms to determine stress; a control study, J. geophys. Res., 92, 357-368.
40. Platt, J.P., Kaus, B. & Becker, T.W., 2008. The mechanics of continental transforms: an alternative approach with applications to the San Andreas system and the tectonics of California, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 274(3-4), 380-391.
41. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.H. & Flannery, B.P., 1992. Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, New York.
42. Rivera, L. & Kanamori, H., 2002. Spatial heterogeneity of tectonic stress and friction in the crust, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, doi:.
43. Rockwell, T.K. & Ben-Zion, Y., 2007. High localization of primary slip zones in large earthquakes from paleoseismic trenches: observations and implications for earthquake physics, J. geophys. Res., 112(B10304), doi:.
44. Sipkin, S.A. & Silver, P.G., 2003. Characterization of the time-dependent strain field at seismogenic depths using first-motion focal mechanisms: observations of large-scale decadal variations in stress along the San Andreas Fault system, J. geophys. Res., 108(B7), 2339, doi:.
45. Stirling, M.W., Wesnousky, S.G. & Shimazaki, K., 1996. Fault trace complexity, cumulative slip, and the shape of the magnitude-frequency distribution for strike-slip faults: a global survey, Geophys. J. Int., 124(3), 833-868, doi:.
46. Thurber, C., Zhang, H., Waldhauser, F., Hardebeck, J.L., Michael, A. & Eberhart-Phillips, D., 2006. Three-dimensional compressional wavespeed model, earthquake relocations, and focal mechanisms for the Parkfield, California, region, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 96(4B), S38-S49, doi:.
47. Turcotte, D.L., 1997. Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England/New York.
48. Wechsler, N., Ben-Zion, Y. & Christofferson, S., 2010. Evolving geometrical heterogeneities of fault trace data, Geophys. J. Int., 182, 551-567,.
49. Wesnousky, S.G., 1988. Seismological and structural evolution of strike-slip faults, Nature, 335, 340-343, doi:.
50. Wesnousky, S.G., 2006. Predicting the endpoints of earthquake ruptures, Nature, 444, 358-360.
51. Wessel, P. & Smith, W.H.F., 1998. New, improved version of the Generic Mapping Tools released, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 79(47), 579.
52. Zoback, M.D. et al., 1993. Upper-crustal strength inferred from stress measurements to 6 km depth in the KTB borehole, Nature, 365, 633-635, doi:.
53. Zöller, G., Holschneider, M. & Ben-Zion, Y., 2005. The role of heterogeneities as a tuning parameter of earthquake dynamics, Pure appl. Geophys., 162(6-7), 1027-1049.