Improvement in nasolabial folds with a hyaluronic acid filler using a cohesive polydensified matrix technology: Results from an 18-month open-label extension trial

Dermatologic Surgery

Volumn 36, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2010, Pages 1800-1808

  Narins, Rhoda S ^a   Coleman Iii, William P ^b   Donofrio, Lisa M ^c   Jones, Derek H ^d   Maas, Corey ^e   Monheit, Gary ^f   Kaur, Mandeep ^g   Grundy, Starr L ^g   Pappert, Eric J ^g   Hardas, Bhushan ^g  

^a Dermatology Surgery and Laser Center   (United States)

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Skin Care and Laser Physicians of Beverly Hills   (United States)

^e Maas Clinic   (United States)

^f TOTAL   (France)

^g Merz Pharmaceuticals LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYALURONIC ACID;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG TOLERABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INJECTION SITE CONTUSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NASOLABIAL FOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SKIN DEFECT; WRINKLE; WRINKLE SEVERITY RATING SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; COSMETIC TECHNIQUES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FACE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYALURONIC ACID; INJECTIONS, INTRADERMAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RHYTIDOPLASTY; SKIN AGING; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISCOSUPPLEMENTS;

EID: 78349248998     PISSN: 10760512     EISSN: 15244725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01735.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Monheit GD, Davis B., Nasolabial folds. In:, Carruthers J, Carruthers A, editors. Soft Tissue Augmentation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2008. p. 105-26.
2. Carruthers A, Carey W, De Lorenzi C, et al,. Randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacy of two hyaluronic acid derivatives, Restylane Perlane and Hylaform, in the treatment of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31: 1591-8.
3. Lindqvist C, Tveten S, Bondevik BE, Fagrell D., A randomized, evaluator-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Perlane versus Zyplast in the correction of nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 282-9.
4. Bezzola A, Micheels P., Esthélis, hyaluronic acid of Swiss design. First complete study of the physico-chemical characteristics and clinical trials. J Méd Esth et Chir Derm 2005; XXXII: 11-20.
5. ™ (CPMHA) is superior to bovine collagen in the correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds: results from a six-month, randomized, blinded, controlled, multicenter study. Dermatol Surg 2010; 36 Suppl 1): 730-40.
6. Day DJ, Littler CM, Swift RW, Gottlieb S., The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale: a validation study. Am J Clin Dermatol 2004; 5: 49-52.
7. Narins RS, Brandt F, Leyden J, et al,. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29: 588-95.
8. Narins RS, Dayan SH, Brandt FS, Baldwin EK., Persistence and improvement of nasolabial fold correction with nonanimal-stabilized hyaluronic acid 100,000 gel particles/mL filler on two retreatment schedules: results up to 18 months on two retreatment schedules. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34 (Suppl 1): S2-8, discussion S8.:S2-S8.
9. Moers-Carpi MM, Tufet JO., Calcium hydroxylapatite versus nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid for the correction of nasolabial folds: a 12-month, multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, split-face trial. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34: 210-5.
10. Lupo MP, Smith SR, Thomas JA, et al,. Effectiveness of Juvederm Ultra Plus dermal filler in the treatment of severe nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 289-97.
11. Hamilton RG, Strobos J, Adkinson NF Jr., Immunogenicity studies of cosmetically administered nonanimal-stabilized hyaluronic acid particles. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33 (Suppl 2): S176-85, S176-5.