Clinico-radio-pathologic features of a solitary solid renal mass at MDCT examination

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 51, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1143-1148

  Kim, Eun Young ^a,b   Park, Byung Kwan ^a   Kim, Chan Kyo ^a   Lee, Hyun Moo ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Gachon University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Kidney; Multidetector rows; Neoplasm; Renal cell carcinoma

Indexed keywords

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; KIDNEY; MULTI-DETECTORS; NEOPLASM; RENAL CELL CARCINOMA;

PATHOLOGY; TUMORS;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; KIDNEY; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY TUMOR; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78349245579     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02841851.2010.515617     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hafez KS, Fergany AF, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging. J Urol 1999;162:1930-3.
2. Frank I, Blute ML, Leibovich BC, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H. Independent validation of the 2002 American Joint Committee on cancer primary tumor classification for renal cell carcinoma using a large, single institution cohort. J Urol 2005;173:1889-92.
3. Patard JJ, Rodriguez A, Rioux-Leclercq N, Guille F, Lobel B. Prognostic significance of the mode of detection in renal tumours. BJU Int 2002;90:358-63.
4. Silverman SG, Israel GM, Herts BR, Richie J P. Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology 2008;249:16-31.
5. Dalrymple NC, Prasad SR, El-Merhi FM, Chintapalli KN. Price of isotropy in multidetector CT. Radiographics 2007;27:49-62.
6. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 2003;170:2217-20.
7. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. Sixth edition. New York: Springer; 2002. p. 323-5.
8. Lohse CM, Blute ML, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Cheville JC. Comparison of standardized and nonstandardized nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma to predict outcome among 2, 042 patients. Am J Clin Pathol 2002;118:877-86.
9. Bretheau D, Lechevallier E, Eghazarian C, Grisoni V, Coulange C. Prognostic significance of incidental renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 1995;27:319-23.
10. Jayson M, Sanders H. Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology 1998;51:203-5.
11. Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Blute ML. Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:612-24. (Pubitemid 36514472)
12. Bosniak MA, Rofsky NM. Problems in the detection and characterization of small renal masses. Radiology 1996;198:638-41.
13. Birnbaum BA, Hindman N, Lee J, Babb JS. Renal cyst pseudoenhancement: influence of multidetector CT reconstruction algorithm and scanner type in phantom model. Radiology 2007;244:767-75.
14. Wang ZJ, Coakley F V, Fu Y, Joe BN, Prevrhal S, Landeras LA, et al. Renal cyst pseudoenhancement at multidetector CT: what are the effects of number of detectors and peak tube voltage? Radiology 2008;248:910-16.
15. Israel GM, Bosniak MA. How I do it: evaluating renal masses. Radiology 2005;236:441-50.
16. Dechet CB, Zincke H, Sebo TJ, King BF, LeRoy AJ, Farrow GM, et al. Prospective analysis of computerized tomography and needle biopsy with permanent sectioning to determine the nature of solid renal masses in adults. J Urol 2003;169:71-4.
17. Silverman SG, Gan YU, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology 2006;240:6-22.
18. Blumenfeld AJ, Guru K, Fuchs GJ, Kim HL. Percutaneous biopsy of renal cell carcinoma underestimates nuclear grade. Urology 2010 Feb. 15 [Epub ahead of print].
19. Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A, Napoli A, Pediconi F, Danti M, et al. High-resolution multidetector CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1271-7.
20. Turkvatan A, Akdur PO, Altinel M, Olcer T, Turhan N, Cumhur T, et al. Preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma with multidetector CT. Diagn Interv Radiol 2009;15:22-30.
21. Kim JI, Cho JY, Moon KC, Lee HJ, Kim SH. Segmental enhancement inversion at biphasic multidetector CT: characteristic finding of small renal oncocytoma. Radiology 2009;252:441-8.
22. Jinzaki M, Silverman SG, Tanimoto A, Shinmoto H, Kuribayashi S. Angiomyolipomas that do not contain fat attenuation at unenhanced CT. Radiology 2005;234:311; author reply, 2.
23. Catalano OA, Samir AE, Sahani DV, Hahn PF. Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat? Radiology 2008;247:738-46.