Fate of the peer review process at the ESA: Long-term outcome of submitted studies over a 5-year period

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 252, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 715-722

  Raptis, Dimitri A ^a   Oberkofler, Christian E ^a   Gouma, Dirk ^b   James Garden, O ^c   Bismuth, Henri ^d   Lerut, Toni ^e   Clavien, Pierre Alain ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d HÔPITAL PAUL BROUSSE   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CITATION ANALYSIS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; EUROPEAN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; SAMPLE SIZE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AUTHOR; BREAST SURGERY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COLORECTAL SURGERY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA BASE; ENDOCRINE SURGERY; EUROPE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY; GENERAL SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PEER REVIEW ORGANIZATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); THORAX SURGERY; VASCULAR SURGERY;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIBLIOMETRICS; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; EUROPE; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MANUSCRIPTS AS TOPIC; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 78349244075     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f98751     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. European Surgical Association. Available at: http://www.eurosurgical. info.
2. American Surgical Association. Available at: http:www.americansurgical. info.
3. Errami M, Garner H.Atale of two citations.Nature. 2008;451(7177):397-399.
4. Thomson Reuters, ISI Web ofKnowledge SM, Online Citation Analysis. Available at: http://isiwebofknowledge.com
5. Déjà vu website, the duplicate citation database. Available at: http://www. discovery.swmed.edu/dejavu.
6. Errami M, Hicks JM, Fisher W, et al. Deja vu\a study ofduplicate citations inMEDLINE. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(2):243-249.
7. Couzin-Frankel J, Grom J. Scientific publishing. Plagiarism sleuths. Science. 2009;324(5930):1004-1007.
8. Ishizawa T, Hasegawa K, Aoki T, et al. Neither multiple tumors nor portal hypertension are surgical contraindications for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(7):1908-1916.
9. Dokmak S, Paradis V, Vilgrain V, et al. A single-center surgical experience of 122patients withsingle andmultiplehepatocellular adenomas. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(5):1698-1705.
10. Strate T, Bachmann K, Busch P, et al. Resection vs drainage in treatment of chronic pancreatitis: long-termresultsofarandomizedtrial. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1406-1411.
11. Furrer K, Tian Y, Pfammatter T, et al. Selective portal vein embolization and ligation trigger different regenerative responses in the rat liver. Hepatology. 2008;47(5):1615-1623.
12. + regulatory T cell infiltration of human pancreatic carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(15):1188-1199.
13. Adam R, de Haas RJ, Wicherts DA, et al. Is hepatic resectionjustified after chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases and lymph node involvement?J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(22):3672-3680.
14. Hermann PC, Huber SL, Herrler T, et al. Distinct populations ofcancer stem cells determine tumor growth and metastatic activity in human pancreatic cancer. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1(3):313-323.
15. Dindo D, Muller MK, Weber M, et al. Obesity in general elective surgery Lancet. 2003;361(9374):2032-2035.
16. Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality morbidity and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240(3):416-423; discussion 423-424.
17. Clavien PA, Selzner M, Rudiger HA, et al. A prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients undergoing major liver resection with versus without ischemic preconditioning. Ann Surg. 2003;238(6):843-850; discussion 851-852.
18. Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN, Ellis LM, et al. Recurrence and outcomes following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection/ablation for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2004;239(6):818-825; discussion 825-827.
19. Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local controlbutno survival benefitin irradiated patients withresectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246(5):693-701.
20. Tran KT, Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, et al. Pylorus preserving pancreatico-duodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: aprospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors. Ann Surg. 2004;240(5):738-745
21. Association for Women in Science. Available at: http://www.awis.org.
22. European Commission, Improving Human Research Potential and Socioeco-nomic Knowledge Base. Women and Science Unit. Available at: http://cordis. europa.eu/improving/women/home.htm.
23. Progress Report: Commission Staff Working Paper. Women and science: the gender dimension as a leverage for reforming science. Brussels: European Commission; 2001.
24. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, et al. No surgical innovation with-out evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1105- 1112.
25. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, et al. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1097-1104.
26. Barkun JS, Aronson JK, Feldman LS, et al. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1089-1096.