Systematic review and its relationship with evidence-based practice in health;A revisão sistemática e a sua relação com a prática baseada na evidência em saúde

Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 824-831

  Medina, Eugenia Urra ^a   Pailaquilén, René Mauricio Barría ^b  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGÍA   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; Research; Review

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; NURSING; REVIEW; SOUTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA;

CLASSIFICATION; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HUMANS; LATIN AMERICA; NURSING;

EID: 78349242104     PISSN: 01041169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-11692010000400023     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Whittemore R. Combining evidence in nursing research: methods and implications. Nurs Res 2005;54(1):56-62.
2. Newell R, Burnard P. Vital Notes for Nurses: Research for evidence-based practice. New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell; 2006.
3. Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997;126(5):376-80.
4. Greener J, Grimshaw J. Using meta-analysis to summarise evidence within systematic reviews. Nurse Res 1996;4(1):27-38.
5. Green S, Higgins JP, Alderson P, Clarke M, Mulrow C, Oxman A. Introduction. In: Higgins JP, Green S. (Eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. England: Willey-Blackwell; 2008.
6. Magarey JM. Elements of a systematic review. Int J Nurs Pract 2001;7(6):376-82.
7. Evans D, Pearson A. Systematic reviews: gatekeepers of nursing knowledge. J Clin Nurs 2001;10(5):593-9.
8. Hek G, Langton H, Blunden G. Systematically searching and reviewing literature. Nurse Res 2000;7(3):40-57.
9. Mulrow CD, Cook DJ, Davidoff F. Systematic reviews: critical links in the great chain of evidence. Ann Intern Med 1997;126(5):389-91.
10. Clark K, Ohlsson A. The contribution of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Canadian Cochrane Network and Centre. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2002;46(3):137-43.
11. Levin A. The Cochrane Collaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001;135(4):309-12.
12. Green S, McDonald S. Cochrane Collaboration: more than systematic reviews? Intern Med J 2005;35(1):4-5.
13. Summerskill W. Cochrane Collaboration and the evolution of evidence. Lancet 2005;366(9499):1760.
14. Holopainen A, Hakulinen-Viitanen T, Tossavainen K. Systematic review--a method for nursing research. Nurse Res 2008;16(1):72-83.
15. Meade MO, Richardson WS. Selecting and appraising studies for a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 1997;127(7):531-7.
16. McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. J Med Libr Assoc 2005;93(1):74-80.
17. Sindhu F, Dickson R. The complexity of searching the literature. Int J Nurs Pract 1997;3(4):211-7.
18. Lynn MR. Meta-analysis: appropriate tool for the integration of nursing research? Nurs Res 1989;38(5):302-5.
19. Thompson SG. Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated. BMJ 1994;309(6965):1351-5.
20. McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Using numerical results from systematic reviews in clinical practice. Ann Intern Med 1997;126(9):712-20.
21. Galvão CM, Sawada NO, Trevizan MA. Revisão sistemática: recurso que proporciona a incorporação das evidências na prática da enfermagem. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2004;12(3):549-56.
22. Cook DJ, Greengold NL, Ellrodt AG, Weingarten SR. The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1997;127(3):210-6.