Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus robotic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A series of 60 cases performed by a single surgeon

Canadian Journal of Urology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 5012-5016

  Hemal, Ashok K ^a   Mukherjee, Satyadip ^a   Singh, Kaku ^a  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty; Pyeloplast; Robotic pyeloplasty; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ROBOTICS; URETER; URETER OBSTRUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ROBOTICS; URETER; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78349239922     PISSN: 11959479     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150(6):1795-1799.
2. Bauer JJ, Bishoff JT, Moore RG, Chen RN, Iverson AJ, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty:Assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol 1999;162(3 Pt 1):692-695.
3. Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Kratzik C, Marberger MJ. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero pelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2003;44(3):340-345.
4. Sung GT, Gill IS, Hsu TH. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty:a pilot study. Urology 1999;53(6):1099-1103.
5. Lee RS, Borer JG. Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Curr Opin Urol 2006;16(4):291-294.
6. Yee DS, Shanberg AM, Duel BP, Rodriguez E, Eichel L, Rajpoot D. Initial comparison of robotic assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology 2006;67(3):599-602.
7. Atalla MA, Dovey Z, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic versus robotic pyeloplasty:man versus machine. Expert Rev Med Devices 2010; 7(1):27-34.
8. Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the da Vinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic technique:initial clinical results. Eur Urol 2002;42(5):453-457.
9. Lee RS, Retik AB, Borer JG, Peters CA. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol 2006;175(2):683-687.
10. Palese MA, Stifelman MD, Munver R, Sosa RE, Philipps CK, Dinlenc C, Del Pizzo JJ. Robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty:A combined experience. J Endourol 2005;19(3):382-386.
11. Gupta NP, Mukherjee S, Nayyar R, Hemal AK, Kumar R. Transmesocolic robot-assisted pyeloplasty:single center experience. J Endourol 2009;23(6):945-948.
12. Patel V. Robotic assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urology 2005;66(1):45-49.
13. Hemal AK, Mishra S, Mukharjee S, Suryavanshi M. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair. Int J Urol 2008;15(8):744-746.
14. Hemal AK, Goel R, Goel A. Cost-effective laparoscopic pyeloplasty:single center experience. Int J Urol 2003;10(11):563-568.
15. Weise ES, Winfield HN. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty vesrsus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2006:20(10):813-819.
16. Link RE, Bhayani SB, Kavoussi LR. A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg 2006;243(4):486-491.
17. Braga LH, Pace K, Demaria J, Lorenzo AJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction:effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate. Eur Urol 2009 Apr 1. [Epub ahead of print]
18. Hemal AK. Robotic pyeloplasty-is it the gold standard? AUA News 2010;15(1):1-6.