Artifact or process guidance, an empirical study

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6395 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2010, Pages 318-330

  Almeida Da Silva, Marcos Aurélio ^a   Mougenot, Alix ^a   Bendraou, Reda ^a   Robin, Jacques ^a   Blanc, Xavier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE TOOLS; DEFECT DETECTION; DEFECT PREVENTION; DEVELOPMENT TIME; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; ITERATIVE DEVELOPMENT; MODEL QUALITIES; REFACTORINGS; UML MODEL;

DEFECTS; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

MODELS;

EID: 78349237838     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16129-2_23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Apple Inc.: Cocoa Design Patterns (2010)
2. Bendraou, R., Gervais, M.-P., Blanc, X.: UML4SPM: A UML2.0-Based Metamodel for Software Process Modelling. In: Briand, L.C.,Williams, C. (eds.) MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 17-38. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
3. Blanc, X., Mougenot, A., Mounier, I., Mens, T.: Detecting model inconsistency through operation-based model construction. In: Robby (ed.) Proc. Int'l Conf. Software engineering (ICSE 2008), vol. 1, pp. 511-520. ACM, New York (2008)
4. Cass, A.G., Osterweil, L.: Process support to help novices design software faster and better. In: Proc. Int'l Conf. Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2005), pp. 295-299. ACM, New York (2005)
5. Cuccuru, A., Radermacher, A., Gérard, S., Terrier, F.: Constraining type parameters of uml 2 templates with substitutable classifiers. In: Schürr, A., Selic, B. (eds.) MODELS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5795, pp. 644-649. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
6. Curtis, B., Kellner, M.I., Over, J.: Process modeling. Commun. ACM 35(9), 75-90 (1992)
7. Egyed, A.: Instant consistency checking for UML. In: Proceedings Int'l Conf. Software Engineering (ICSE 2006), pp. 381-390. ACM Press, New York (2006)
8. Egyed, A.: Fixing inconsistencies in UML design models. In: Proc. Int'l Conf. Software Engineering (ICSE 2007), pp. 292-301. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)
9. Egyed, A., Letier, E., Finkelstein, A.: Generating and evaluating choices for fixing inconsistencies in UML design models. In: Proc. ACM/IEEE Int'l Conf. Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2008), pp. 99-108. ACM, New York (2008)
10. Finkelstein, A., Kramer, J., Nuseibeh, B., Finkelstein, L., Goedicke,M.: Viewpoints: A Framework for Integrating Multiple Perspectives in System Development. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 2(1), 31-57 (1992)
11. Fuggetta, A.: Software process: a roadmap. In: ICSE - Future of SE Track, pp. 25-34 (2000)
12. Krasner, G.E., Pope, S.T.: A cookbook for using the model-view controller user interface paradigm in smalltalk-80. J. Object Oriented Program. 1(3), 26-49 (1988)
13. Tiedto, P.: Cheat sheets in Eclipse. IBM Developer Networks (August 2006)
14. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Host, M., Ohlsson, C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: an Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)
15. Zhang, H., Kitchenham, B.A., Pfahl, D.: Reflections on 10 years of software process simulation modeling: A systematic review. In: Wang, Q., Pfahl, D., Raffo, D.M. (eds.) ICSP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5007, pp. 345-356. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)