Uncertainties in stormwater runoff data collection from a small urban catchment, Southeast China

Journal of Environmental Sciences

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1703-1709

  Huang, Jinliang ^a   Tu, Zhenshun ^c   Du, Pengfei ^b   Lin, Jie ^a   Li, Qingsheng ^a  

^a XIAMEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Fujian Institute of Oceanology   (China)

Author keywords

Data collection; In situ monitoring data; Uncertainty; Urban stormwater runoff

Indexed keywords

DATA COLLECTION; DISCRETE SAMPLE; ERROR PROPAGATION ANALYSIS; EVENT MEAN CONCENTRATIONS; FLOW VOLUMES; IN-SITU MONITORING; LABORATORY ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY; SAMPLE COLLECTION; STORM WATER RUNOFF; STORMWATERS; TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS; UNCERTAINTY; URBAN CATCHMENT; URBAN STORMWATER RUNOFF;

CATCHMENTS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DATA ACQUISITION; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FLOWMETERS; LOAD TESTING; MONITORING; OXYGEN; RUNOFF; STORM SEWERS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

RAIN;

CATCHMENT; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; MONITORING; NUMERICAL MODEL; RUNOFF; STORMWATER; SUSPENDED LOAD; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHINA; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY; WATER FLOW;

CHINA; DATA COLLECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; RAIN; UNCERTAINTY; WATER MOVEMENTS;

CHINA;

EID: 78349231965     PISSN: 10010742     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60309-0     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ahyerre M, Chebbo G, Tassin B, Gaume E Storm water quality modelling, an ambitious objective?. Water Science & Technology 1998, 37:205-213.
2. Behrens B, Riddle JH, Gillespie J Tips to improve wet weather monitoring. American Public Works Association (APWA) Reporter (27 November 2009). http://www.apwa.net/Pub-lications/Reporter/ReporterOnline/index.asp?DISPLAY=ISSUE&ISSUE_DATE=092004&ARTICLENUMBER=889.
3. Bertrand-Krajewski JL Stormwater pollutant loads modelling: epistemological aspects and case studies on the influence of field data sets on calibration and verification. Water Science & Technology 2007, 55(4):1-17.
4. Bertrand-Krajewski JL, Bardin JP Evaluation of uncertainties in urban hydrology: application to volumes and pollutant loads in a storage and settling tank. Water Science & Technology 2002, 45:437-444.
5. Deletic AB, Maksimovic CT Evaluation of water quality factors in storm runoff from paved areas. Journal of Environmental Engineering 1998, 124(9):869-879.
6. Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G Uncertainty assessment of an integrated urban drainage model. Journal of Hydrology 2009, 373(3-4):392-404.
7. Gordon J D, Nland C A, Gagliardi S T, 2000. Laboratory performance in the sediment laboratory quality-assurance project, 1996-1998. USGS Water Resources Investigation Report 99-4184. Washington DC.
8. Haydon S, Deletic A Model output uncertainty of a coupled pathogen indicator-hydrologic catchment model due to input data uncertainty. Environmental Modelling & Software 2009, 24:322-328.
9. Haggard BE, Soerens TS, Green WR, Richard RP Using regression methods to estimate stream phosphorus loads at the Illinois River, Arkansas. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 2003, 19(2):187-194.
10. Harmel RD, King KW, Slade RM Automated storm water sampling on small watersheds. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 2003, 19(6):667-674.
11. Harmel RD, Cooper RJ, Slade RM, Haney RL, Arnold JG Cumulative uncertainty in measured stream flow and water quality data for small watersheds. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 2006, 49(3):689-701.
12. Harmel RD, King KW, Haggard BE, Wren DG, Sheridan JM Practical guidance for discharge and water quality data collection on small watersheds. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 2006, 49(4):937-948.
13. Harmel RD, Smith DR, King KW, Slade RM Estimating storm discharge and water quality data uncertainty: A software tool for monitoring and modeling applications. Environmental Modelling & Software 2009, 24:832-842.
14. Leecaster MK, Schiff K, Tiefenthaler LT Assessment of efficient sampling designs for urban stormwater monitoring. Water Research 2002, 36:1556-1564.
15. Li J Error Theory and Measure Uncertainty Assessment 2003, 105. China Measurement Publishing Company, Beijing, 223.
16. Kothlash AR, Chessman BC Effects of water sample preservation and storage on nitrogen and phosphorous determinations: Implications for the use of automated sampling equipment. Water Research 1998, 32:3731-3737.
17. Martin GR, Smoot JL, White KD A comparison of surface-grab and crosssectionally integrated stream-water-quality sampling methods. Water Environment 1992, 64(7):866-876.
18. McCarthy DT, Deletic A, Mitchell VG, Fletcher TD, Diaper C Uncertainties in stormwater E. coli levels. Water Research 2008, 42:1812-1824.
19. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1983. Results of the nationwide urban runoff program. Vol. I-final report, Washington D C.
20. US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2007. National Water Quality Inventory: Report to Congress (2002). US EPA, Rep 841-R-07-001, Washington, DC.
21. XMEPB (Xiamen Environmental Protection Bureau) Xiamen Environmental Quality Bulletin in 2008 http://www.xmepb.gov.cn/sj/ContentView.aspx?CmsList=102&CmsID=14.
22. Yin CQ Urban diffuse pollution - A new challenge to the rapid urbanization in China. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae 2006, 26(7):1053-1056.
23. State Environmental Protection Administration of China Methods of Monitoring and analyzing for Water and Wastewater 2002, 105. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing, 223.