Effect of a French experiment of team work between general practitioners and nurses on efficacy and cost of type 2 diabetes patients care

Health Policy

Volumn 98, Issue 2-3, 2010, Pages 131-143

  Mousquès, Julien ^a,b   Bourgueil, Yann ^a,b   Le Fur, Philippe ^a,b   Yilmaz, Engin ^c  

^a Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics IRDES   (France)

^b Interdisciplinary Partnership for Research on the Organisation of Primary Care (PROSPERE)   (France)

^c Department of Research Study   (France)

Author keywords

Comparative study; Cost analysis; Diabetes mellitus; Health care team; Outcome and process assessment; Primary health care

Indexed keywords

CREATININE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRANCE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROALBUMINURIA; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; NURSING PRACTICE; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; REGISTER;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; COST CONTROL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FRANCE; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; NURSES; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT CARE TEAM; PHYSICIAN-NURSE RELATIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78249286816     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Elizabeth Docteur E., Oxley H. No. 9 - Health-care systems: lessons from the reform experience. Health working papers no. 9 2003, OECD, Paris.
2. Hofmarcher M.M., Oxley H., Rusticelli E. Improved health system performance through better care coordination. Health working papers no. 30 2007, OECD, Paris.
3. Atun R. What are the advantages and disadvantages of restructuring a health care system to be more focused on primary care services?. Health evidence network report 2004, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.
4. Macinko J., Starfield B., Shi L. The contribution of primary care systems to health outcomes within organization for economic cooperation and development (OECD) countries, 1970-1998. HSR: Health Services Research 2003, 38:831-865.
5. Saltman R.B., Rico A., Boerma W. Primary care in the driver's seat? Organizational reform in European primary care. European observatory on health systems and policies series 2006, Open University Press, Berkshire.
6. World Health Organization The world health report 2008: now more than ever 2008, World Health Organization, Geneva.
7. Wagner E.H. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?. Effective Clinical Practice 1998, 1:2-4.
8. Grimshaw J.M., Thomas R.E., Mc Lennan G., Fraser C.R., Vale L. Effectiveness and efficiency of guidelines dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment 2004, 8(6).
9. Renders C.M., Valk G.D., Griffin S., Wagner E.H., Eijk J.Th.M., van Assendelft W.J.J. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library 2003, (3).
10. Laurant M., Reeves D., Hermens R., Braspenning J., Grol R., Sibbald B. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, (4).
11. Buchan J., Calman L. Skill-mix and policy change in the health workforce: nurses in advanced roles. Health working papers no. 17 2005, OECD, Paris.
12. Zwarenstein M., Reeves S., Barr H., Hammick M., Koppel I., Atkins J. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library 2003, (3). Oxford: update software.
13. Knight K., Badamgarav E., Henning J.M., Hasselblad V., Gano A.D., Ofman J.J. A systematic review of diabetes disease management programs. American Journal of Manage Care 2005, 11:242-250.
14. Beaulieu N., Cutler D.M., Ho K., Isham G., Lindquist T., Nelson A., et al. The business case for diabetes disease management for managed care organizations. Forum for Health Economics & Policy 2006, 9(1).
15. Tollen L. Physician organization in relation to quality and efficiency of care. A synthesis of recent literature. The Commonwealth Fund 2008, Kaiser Permanente Institute for Health Policy, New York.
16. Midy F. Efficacité et efficience du partage des compétences dans le secteur des soins primaires, revue de la littérature (1970-2002). Question d'économie de la santé no. 65 2003, IRDES, Paris.
17. Sibbald B. Skill mix in primary care - the UK experience. Oral communication during the international conference Politiques et organisation des soins primaires: concepts, outils et pratiques en Europe et aux Etats-Unis 2009 Octobre, Quels enseignements pour la France?, Paris.
18. Agence Nationale de l'Evaluation en Santé Efficacité des méthodes de mise en œuvre des recommandations médicales 2000, Agence Nationale de l'Evaluation en Santé, Paris.
19. Haut conseil pour l'avenir de l'assurance maladie. Rapport du haut conseil pour l'avenir de l'Assurance Maladie. Paris; 2004.
20. Haut conseil pour l'avenir de l'assurance maladie. Rapport du haut conseil pour l'avenir de l'Assurance Maladie 2009. Paris; 2009.
21. Cour des Comptes. Les actions sur les comportements des professionnels de santé et des assurés sociaux in Rapport sur la sécurité sociale 2005. Paris; 2005.
22. Bras P.L., Duhamel G., Grass E. Improving the care of the chronically ill: lessons from foreign disease management experience. Pratiques et Organisation des Soins 2006, 341-356.
23. Naiditch M., Dourgnon P. The preferred doctor scheme: a political reading of a French experiment of gate-keeping. Working paper no. 22 2009, IRDES, Paris.
24. Elbaum M. Participation financière des patients et équilibre de l'assurance maladie. lettre de l'OFCE no. 301 2008, OFCE, Paris.
25. Detournay B., Brami G., Nachit-Ouinekh F., Eschwege E. Prévalence et coût du diabète en France: où en est-on?. Médecine des maladies métaboliques 2007, 1:1-5.
26. Germanaud J., Deprez P.H., Delvoye S., Gabach P., Schmitt B., Lasfargues G., et al. Une typologie des pratiques médicales comme outil de l'amélioration de la qualité des soins. Expérience dans la prise en charge des malades diabétique par les médecins généralistes. Revue médicale de l'Assurance Maladie 2003, 34:85-91.
27. Fagot-Campagna A., Simon D., Varroud-Vial M., Ihaddadène K., Vallier N., Scaturro S., et al. Caractéristiques des personnes diabétiques traitées et adéquation du suivi médical du diabète aux recommandations officielles. Entred 2001. BEH no. 49-50 2003, INVS, Paris.
28. Robert J., Roudier C., Poutignat N., Fagot-Campagna A., Weill A., Rudnichi A., et al. Prise en charge des personnes diabétiques de type 2 en France en 2007 et tendances par rapport à 2001. BEH no. 42-43 2009, INVS, Paris.
29. Schoen C., Osborn R.S., How K.H., Doty M.M., Peugh J. In chronic condition: experiences of patients with complex health care needs, in eight countries, 2008 2008 November, Health AffairsWeb Exclusive.
30. Vallier N., Weill A., Salanave B., Bourrel R., Cayla M., Suarez C., et al. Cost of thirty long-term diseases for beneficiaries of the French general health insurance scheme in 2004. Pratiques et Organisation des soins 2006, 4:267-283.
31. Paita M., Weill A. Les personnes en affection de longue durée au 31 décembre 2007. Points de repère no. 20 2008, CNAMTS, Paris.
32. Berland Y. MissionCoopération des professions de santé: le transfert de tâches et de compétences 2003, Rapport d'étape présenté par le Pr Yvon Berland, Paris.
33. Berland Y., Bourgueil Y. Cinq expérimentations de coopération et de délégation de tâches entre professions de santé 2006, ONDPS, Paris.
34. Haute Autorité de Santé. Délégation, transfert, nouveaux métiers... Comment favoriser les formes nouvelles de coopération entre professionnels de santé 2008, Recommandation de la HAS en collaboration avec l'ONDPS, Paris.
35. Boyer L., Ohrond C., Fortanier C., Fourny M., Horte C., Loï R., et al. Quality, cost and outcome of the coordinated management of type 2 diabetic patients in a healthcare network. Pratiques et Organisation des Soins 2007, 38:111-117.
36. Loveman E., Frampton G.K., Clegg A.J. The clinical effectiveness of diabetes education models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 2008, 12(9).
37. Khunti K., Gadsby R., Millett C., Majeed A., Davies M. Quality of diabetes care in the UK: comparison of published quality-of-care reports with results of the quality and outcomes framework for diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 2007, 24:1436-1441.
38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). The Lancet 1998, 352:837-853.
39. Shojania K.G., Ranji S.R., McDonald K.M., Grimshaw J.M., Sundaram V., Rushakoff R.J., et al. Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. JAMA 2006, 26:427-440.
40. Gertler P., Simcoe T.S. Disease management. Social Science Research Network 2006, working paper.
41. Gulliford M.C., Ashworth M., Robotham D., Mohiddin A. Achievement of metabolic targets for diabetes by English primary care practices under a new system of incentives. Diabetic Medicine 2007, 24:505-511.
42. Smith S.M., Allwright S., O'Dowd T. Does sharing care across the primary-specialty interface improve outcomes in chronic disease? A systematic review. American Journal of Manage Care 2008, 14:213-224.
43. Calvert M., Shankar A., McManus R.J., Lester H., Freemantle N. Effect of the quality and outcomes framework on diabetes care in the United Kingdom: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2009, 339:b2768.
44. Campbell S.M., Reeves D., Kontopantelis E., Sibbald B., Roland M. Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England. New England Journal of Medicine 2009, 361:368-378.
45. Fireman B., Bartlett J., Selby J. Can disease management reduce health cost by improving quality. Health Affairs 2004, 23:76-78.