High-yield irrigated maize in the Western U.S. Corn Belt: I. On-farm yield, yield potential, and impact of agronomic practices

Field Crops Research

Volumn 120, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 142-150

  Grassini, Patricio ^a   Thorburn, John ^b   Burr, Charles ^a   Cassman, Kenneth G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b Tri Basin Natural Resources District   (United States)

Author keywords

Exploitable yield gap; Maize; On farm yield; Simulation model; Yield potential; Zea mays L.

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; AGRICULTURAL MODELING; AGRICULTURAL POLICY; AGRONOMY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CROP PRODUCTION; CROP YIELD; DATABASE; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; FOOD SECURITY; FROST; HIGH YIELDING VARIETY; HYBRID; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; MAIZE; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POPULATION DENSITY; SOWING DATE; TILLAGE;

UNITED STATES;

EMBRYOPHYTA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 78249286210     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abeledo L.G., Savin R., Slafer G.A. Wheat productivity in the Mediterranean Ebro Valley: analyzing the gap between attainable and potential yield with a simulation model. Eur. J. Agron. 2008, 28:541-550.
2. Boomsma C.R., Santini J.B., West T.D., Brewer J.C., McIntyre L.M., Vyn T.J. Maize grain yield responses to plant height variability resulting from crop rotation and tillage in a long term experiment. Soil Tillage Res. 2010, 106:227-240.
3. Cassman K.G. Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96:5952-5959.
4. Cassman K.G., Dobermann A., Walters D.T. Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use-efficiency, and nitrogen management. Ambio 2002, 31:132-140.
5. Cassman K.G., Dobermann A., Walters D.T., Yang H.S. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2003, 28:315-358.
6. Cassman K.G., Liska A.J. Food and fuel for all: realistic or foolish?. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2007, 1:18-23. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/114283521/PDFSTART.
7. Cirilo A.G., Andrade F.H. Sowing date and maize productivity: I. Crop growth and dry matter partitioning. Crop Sci. 1994, 34:1039-1043.
8. Denison R.F. When can intelligent design of crops by humans outperform natural selection?. Scale and Complexity in Plant Systems Research, Gene-Plant-Crop Relations 2007, 287-302. Springer, The Netherlands. J.H.J. Spiertz, P.C. Struik, H.H. van Laar (Eds.).
9. Dobermann A., Ferguson R.B., Hergert G.W., Shapiro C.A., Tarkalson D., Walters D.T., Wortmann C.S. Nitrogen response in high-yielding corn systems of Nebraska. Proceedings of the Great Plains Soil Fertility Conference 2006, 50-59. Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS. A.J. Schlegel (Ed.).
10. Duvick D.N., Cassman K.G. Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the North-Central United States. Crop Sci. 1999, 39:1622-1630.
11. Evans L.T. Crop Evolution, Adaptation, and Yield 1993, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12. Fischer R.A., Santiveri F., Vidal I.R. Crop rotation, tillage and crop residue management for wheat and maize in the sub-humid tropical highlands. II. Maize and system performance. Field Crops Res. 2002, 79:123-137.
13. Franke R., Nielson G. Smooth interpolation of large sets of scattered data. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 1980, 15:1691-1704.
14. Gentry L.E., Below F.E., David M.B., Bergerou J.A. Source of the soybean N credit in maize production. Plant Soil 2001, 236:175-184.
15. Grassini P., Yang H., Cassman K.G. Limits to maize productivity in Western Corn-Belt: a simulation analysis for fully-irrigated and rainfed conditions. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 2009, 149:1254-1265.
16. Grassini P., Yang H., Irmak S., Thorburn J., Burr C., Cassman K.G. High-yield irrigated maize in the Western U.S. Corn Belt. II. Irrigation management and crop water productivity. Field Crops Res. 2011, 120:133-141.
17. Hubbard K.G. Spatial variability of daily weather variables in the high plains of the USA. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 1994, 68:29-41.
18. Johnson N.C., Copeland P.J., Crookston R.K., Pfleger F.L. Mycorrhizae: possible explanation for yield decline with continuous corn and soybean. Agron. J. 1992, 84:387-390.
19. Klein R.N., Wilson R.K. Nebraska Crop Production Budgets. Nebguide EC872 2010, University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service, Lincoln, Available from: http://cropwatch.unl.edu/web/economics/budgets (accessed 01.09.10.).
20. Kirkegaard J., Christen O., Krupinsky J., Layzell D. Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production. Field Crops Res. 2008, 107:185-195.
21. Lobell D.B., Cassman K.G., Field C.B. Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitude, and causes. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2009, 34:1-26.
22. Lobell D.B., Ortiz-Monasterio J.I., Asner G.P., Naylor R.L., Falcon W.P. Combining field surveys, remote sensing, and regression trees to understand yield variations in an irrigated wheat landscape. Agron. J. 2005, 97:241-249.
23. Loomis R.S., Connor D.J. Crop Ecology. Productivity and Management in Agricultural Systems 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Mercau J.L., Sadras V.O., Satorre E.H., Messina C., Balbi C., Uribelarrea M., Hall A.J. On-farm assessment of regional and seasonal variation in sunflower yield in Argentina. Agric. Syst. 2001, 67:83-103.
25. Nebraska Association of Resources Districts, 2010. Available from: (accessed 01.03.10.). http://www.nrdnet.org/.
26. Nebraska Department of Natural Resources (DNR), 2010. Registered groundwater wells by Natural Resources District. Available from: (accessed 01.03.10.). http://dnrdata.dnr.ne.gov/wellssql/Summary.asp.
27. Otegui M.E., Nicolini M.G., Ruiz R.A., Dodds P.A. Sowing date effects on grain yield components for different maize genotypes. Field Crops Res. 1995, 87:29-33.
28. Porter P.M., Lauer J.G., Lueschen W.E., Ford J.H., Hoverstad T.R., Oplinger E.S., Crookston K.R. Environment affects the corn and soybean rotation effect. Agron. J. 1997, 89:441-448.
29. Sadras V., Roget D., O'Leary G.O. On-farm assessment of environmental and management constraints to wheat yield and efficiency in the use of rainfall in the Malle. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2002, 53:587-598.
30. Tollenaar M., Lee E.A. Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Res. 2002, 75:161-169.
31. Tri-Basin Natural Resources District, 2010. Available from: (accessed 01.03.10.). http://www.tribasinnrd.org/.
32. USDA-Economic Research Service (ERS). Adoption of genetically engineered crops in the U.S.: corn varieties. Available from: (accessed 01.09.10.). http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/BiotechCrops/ExtentofAdoptionTable1.htm.
33. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Soil survey geographic (SSURGO) database for Gosper, Kearney, and Phelps counties, Nebraska. Available from: (accessed 01.10.09.). http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/.
34. USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), 1970-2008. Crops U.S. state and county databases. Washington DC. Available from: (accessed 01.10.09.). http://www.nass.usda.gov/index.asp.
35. Verma S.B., Dobermann A., Cassman K.G., Walters D.T., Knops J.M., Arkebauer T.J., Suyker A.E., Burba G.G., Amos B., Yang H., Ginting D., Hubbard K.G., Gitelson A.A., Walter-Shea E.A. Annual carbon dioxide exchange in irrigated and rainfed maize-based agroecosystems. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 2005, 131:77-96.
36. Wiese M.V. Crop management by comprehensive appraisal of yield determining variables. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1982, 20:419-432.
37. Yang H.S., Dobermann A., Cassman K.G., Lindquist J.L., Walters D.T., Arkebauer T.J., Cassman K.G. Hybrid-Maize: a maize simulation model that combines two crop modelling approaches. Field Crops Res. 2004, 87:131-154.
38. Yang H.S., Dobermann A., Cassman K.G., Walters D.T. Hybrid-Maize (ver. 2006). A Simulation Model for Corn Growth and Yield 2006, Nebraska Cooperative Extension CD 9, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, Available from: http://www.hybridmaize.unl.edu/UserGuide.htm.