Comparison of standard mammography with digital mammography and digital infrared thermal imaging for breast cancer screening;Meme kanseri taramasında standart mamografi ile dijital mamografi ve dijital infrared termal görüntülemenin karşılaştınlması

Journal of the Turkish German Gynecology Association

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 152-157

  Köşüş, Nermin ^a   Köşüş, Aydin ^a   Duran, Müzeyyen ^a   Simavli, Serap ^a   Turhan, Nilgün ^a  

^a FATIH UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Digital infrared thermal imaging; Digital mammography; Mammography

Indexed keywords

BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST CYST; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL INFRARED THERMAL IMAGING; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; IONIZING RADIATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; META ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THERMOGRAPHY; X RAY;

EID: 78249284058     PISSN: 13090399     EISSN: 13090380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2010.24     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Parkin DM, Bray, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global Cancer Statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 74-108.
2. Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer 2003; 97: 1528-40.
3. Dündar PE, Özmen D, Öztürk B, Haspolat G, Akyildiz F, Çoban S, et al. The knowledge and attitudes of breast self-examination and mammography in a group of women in a rural area in western Turkey. BMC Cancer. 2006; 6: 43.
4. Tuncer M. In: Significance of cancer in Turkey, the burden of disease and cancer control policies. Tuncer M, editor. Vol. 74. Cancer Control in Turkey, Ankara, Onur Press, Health Ministry Publication; 2008. pp. 5-9.
5. Statistical analyses of National Breast Cancer Registry Program of Turkish Federation of Breast Societies 2008 Executive summary of the national cancer control programmes: policies and managerial guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
6. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55: 74-108.
7. Ozmen V. Breast cancer in the World and Turkey. J Breast Health. 2008; 4: 6-12.
8. Bland KI, Menck HR, Scott-Conner CEH, Morrow M, Winchester DJ, Winchester DP. The National Cancer Data Base 10-year survey of breast carcinoma treatment at hospitals in the United States. Cancer 2000; 83: 1262-73.
9. Michaelson JS, Silverstein M, Wyatt J, Weber G, Moore R, Halpern E, et al. Predicting the survival of patients with breast carcinoma using tumor size. Cancer. Aug 15 2002; 95: 713-23.
10. Olsen O, Gotzsche PC. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 2001; 358: 1340-2.
11. ACOG. Practice Bulletin (2003) Breast cancer screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003; 81: 313-23.
12. Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, Burke W, Costanza ME, Evans WP III, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53: 141-69.
13. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 347-60.
14. Gotzsche PC. Mammographic screening: no reliable supporting evidence? Lancet 2002; 359: 706.
15. Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW. Screening for breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc 2005; 293: 1245-56.
16. Fischer U, Hermann KP, Baum F. Digital mammography: current state and future aspects. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 38-44.
17. Noel A, Thibault F. Digital detectors for mammography: the technical challenges. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 1990-8.
18. Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ. Digital mammography. Radiology 2005; 234: 353-62.
19. Huda W, Sajewicz AM, Ogden KM, Dance DR. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system. Med Phys 2003; 30: 442-8.
20. Mahesh M. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital mammography: an overview. Radiographics 2004; 24: 1747-60.
21. Jackson VP, Reynolds HE, Hawes DR. Sonography of the breast. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. Oct 1996; 17: 460-75.
22. Sickles EA. Breast imaging: from 1965 to the present. Radiology. Apr 2000; 215: 1-16.
23. Weinstein SP, Conant EF, Orel SG, Zuckerman JA, Bellah R., Spectrum of US findings in pediatric and adolescent patients with palpable breast masses. Radiographics. Nov-Dec 2000; 20: 1613-21.
24. Schonberg M.A., Ramanan R.A., McCarthy E.P., and counseling around mammography screening for women aged 80 or older. J. Gen. Intern Med.2006; 21: 979-85.
25. Bloomquist AK, Yaffe MJ, Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Mawdsley GE, Bright S, et al. Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I. Med Phys 2006; 33: 719-36.
26. Bick U. Full-field digital mammography. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2000; 172: 957-64.
27. Jiang LJ, Ng EY, Yeo AC, Wu S, Pan F, Yau WY. et al. A Perspective on Medical Infrared Imaging. J Med Technol 2005; 29: 257-67.
28. Bagavathiappan S, Saravanan T, Philip J, Jayakumar T, Raj B, Karunanithi R, et al. Infrared thermal imaging for detection of peripheral vascular disorders. J Med Phys. 2009; 34: 43-7.
29. Stec B, Dobrowolski A, Susek W. Multifrequency microwave thermograph for biomedical applications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004; 51: 548-51.
30. Ng EY, Sudarshan NM. Numerical computation as a tool to aid thermographic interpretation. J Med Eng Technol. 2001; 25: 53-60.
31. Ng EY, Ung LN, Ng FC, Sim LS. Statistical analysis of healthy and malignant breast thermography. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology 2001; 25: 253-63.
32. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Smith RA. The mammographic screening trials: commentary on the recent work by Olsen and Gotzsche. CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52: 68-71.