A theory of design-by-contract for distributed multiparty interactions

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6269 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 162-176

  Bocchi, Laura ^a   Honda, Kohei ^b   Tuosto, Emilio ^a   Yoshida, Nobuko ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLEAR SPECIFICATIONS; DESIGN BY CONTRACTS; DISTRIBUTED INTERACTION; LOGICAL PREDICATE; MULTI-PARTY PROTOCOLS; MULTIPARTY INTERACTION; PROOF SYSTEM; RECURSIONS; SEQUENTIAL PROGRAMS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SPECIFICATION AND VERIFICATION; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS;

CALCULATIONS; SPECIFICATIONS;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 78249269788     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15375-4_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Acciai, L., Borale, M.: A type system for client progress in a service-oriented calculus. In: Degano, P., De Nicola, R., Meseguer, J. (eds.) Concurrency, Graphs and Models. LNCS, vol. 5065, pp. 625-641. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
2. Berger, M., Honda, K., Yoshida, N.: Completeness and logical full abstraction for modal logics for the typed π-calculus. In: Aceto, L., Damgård, I., Goldberg, L.A., Halldórsson, M.M., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Walukiewicz, I. (eds.) ICALP 2008, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5126, pp. 99-111. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
3. Bettini, L., et al.: Global Progress in Dynamically Interfered Multiparty Sessions. In: van Breugel, F., Chechik, M. (eds.) CONCUR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5201, pp. 418-433. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
4. Bhargavan, K., Corin, R., Deniélou, P.M., Fournet, C., Leifer, J.: Cryptographic protocol synthesis and verification for multiparty sessions. In: CSF, pp. 124-140 (2009)
5. Bhargavan, K., Fournet, C., Gordon, A.D.: Modular verification of security protocol code by typing. In: POPL, pp. 445-456 (2010)
6. Bonelli, E., Compagnoni, A., Gunter, E.: Correspondence assertions for process synchronization in concurrent communications. JFC 15(2), 219-247 (2005)
7. Bravetti, M., Zavattaro, G.: A foundational theory of contracts for multi-party service composition. Fundamenta Informaticae XX, 1-28 (2008)
8. Buscemi, M.,Montanari, U.: CC-Pi:A constraint-based language for specifying service level agreements. In: De Nicola, R. (ed.) ESOP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4421, pp. 18-32. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
9. Caires, L., Vieira, H.T.: Conversation types. In: Castagna, G. (ed.) ESOP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5502, pp. 285-300. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
10. Castagna, G., Padovani, L.: Contracts for mobile processes. In: Bravetti, M., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) CONCUR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5710, pp. 211-228. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
11. Dam, M.: Proof systems for pi-calculus logics. In: Logic for Concurrency and Synchronisation. Trends in Logic, Studia Logica Library, pp. 145-212. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2003)
12. De Nicola, R., et al.: A Basic Calculus for Modelling Service Level Agreements. In: Coordination. LNCS, vol. 3454, pp. 33-48. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
13. Floyd, R.W.: Assigning meaning to programs. In: Proc. Symp. in Applied Mathematics, vol. 19 (1967)
14. Frankel, D.S.: Model Driven Architecture: Applying MDA to Enterprise Computing. Wiley, Chichester (2003)
15. Freeman, T., Pfenning, F.: Refinement types for ml. SIGPLAN Not. 26(6), 268-277 (1991)
16. Guttman, J.D., et al.: Trust management in strand spaces: A rely-guarantee method. In: Schmidt, D. (ed.) ESOP 2004. LNCS, vol. 2986, pp. 325-339. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
17. Hennessy, M., Milner, R.: Algebraic laws for non-determinism and concurrency. JACM32(1) (1985)
18. Hoare, T.: An axiomatic basis of computer programming. CACM 12 (1969)
19. Honda, K., Vasconcelos, V.T., Kubo, M.: Language primitives and type disciplines for structured communication-based programming. In: Hankin, C. (ed.) ESOP 1998. LNCS, vol. 1381, pp. 22-138. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
20. Honda, K., Yoshida, N., Carbone, M.: Multiparty asynchronous session types. In: POPL, pp. 273-284. ACM, New York (2008)
21. The Java Modeling Language (JML) Home Page
22. Jones, C.B.: Specification and design of (parallel) programs. In: IFIP Congress, pp. 321-332 (1983)
23. Leino, K.R.M.: Verifying object-oriented software: Lessons and challenges. In: Grumberg, O., Huth, M. (eds.) TACAS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4424, p. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
24. Mendelson, E.: Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Wadsworth Inc., Bermont (1987)
25. Meyer, B.: Applying "Design by Contract". Computer 25(10), 40-51 (1992)
26. Meyer, B.: Object-Oriented Software Construction, ch. 31. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1997)
27. Nienaltowski, P., Meyer, B., Ostroff, J.S.: Contracts for concurrency. Form. Asp. Comput. 21(4), 305-318 (2009)
28. OMG: Object Constraint Language Version 2.0 (May 2006)
29. Peyton Jones, S., et al.: Composing contracts: an adventure in financial engineering. In: ICFP, pp. 281-292. ACM, New York (2000)
30. Pierce, B.C.: Types and Programming Languages. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)
31. Full version of this paper, http://www.cs.le.ac.uk/people/lb148/ fullpaper.html
32. SAVARA JBoss Project webpage, http://www.jboss.org/savara
33. Vallecillo, A., Vasconcelos, V.T., Ravara, A.: Typing the behavior of objects and components using session types. Fundamenta Informaticæ 73(4), 583-598 (2006)
34. Xi, H., Pfenning, F.: Dependent types in practical programming. In: POPL, pp. 214-227. ACM, New York (1999)
35. Xu, D., Peyton Jones, S.: Static contract checking for Haskell. In: POPL, pp. 41-52. ACM, New York (2009)