Consistency of performance indicators for cardiovascular risk management across procedures and panels

Quality and Safety in Health Care

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Van Lieshout, Jan ^a   Nouwens, Elvira ^a   Bouma, Margriet ^b   Spreeuwenberg, Cor ^c   Wensing, Michel ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b DUTCH COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; DELPHI STUDY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; NETHERLANDS; RISK MANAGEMENT; VALIDATION STUDY;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; NETHERLANDS; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 78249266588     PISSN: 14753898     EISSN: 14753901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2009.037481     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Solberg LI, Mosser G, McDonald S. The three faces of performance measurement: improvement, accountability, and research. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1997;23: 135-47.
2. Campbell SM, Roland MO, Buetow SA. Defining quality of care. Soc Sci Med 2000;51: 1611-25.
3. Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, et al. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11: 358-64.
4. Van Lieshout J, Wensing M, Campbell S, et al. Primary care strength linked to prevention programs for cardiovascular disease. Am JManag Care 2009;15: 255-62.
5. Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO en Nederlands Huisartsen genootschap. Multidisciplinaire CBO-richtlijn/NHG-Standaard Cardiovasculair risicomanagement 2006. Alphen aan den Rijn: Van Zuiden Communications B.V, 2006.
6. Platform Vitale Vaten. Zorgstandaard Vasculair Risicomanagement Deel I (voor zorgverleners) Februari 2009. http://www.vitalevaten.nl/ PlatformVitaleVaten/ Uploads/mID-6085-cID-5076- DEEL%20I%20zorgstandaard%20vrm%2013%20jan% 2009%20def.pdf (accessed 10 Sep 2009).
7. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q 1996;74: 511-44.
8. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000;32: 1008-15.
9. Hung HL, Altschuld JW, Lee YF. Methodological and conceptual issues confronting a cross-country Delphi study of educational program evaluation. Eval Program Plann 2008;31: 191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.02.005.
10. Wollersheim H, Hermens R, Hulscher M, et al. Clinical indicators: development and applications. Neth J Med 2007;65: 15-22.
11. Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, et al. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. BMJ 2003;326: 816-19.
12. Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005;5: 37.
13. Hardy DJ, O'Brien AP, Gaskin CJ, et al. Practical application of the Delphi technique in a bicultural mental health nursing study in New Zealand. J Adv Nurs 2004;46: 95-109.
14. Campbell SM, Shield T, Rogers A, et al. How do stakeholder groups vary in a Delphi technique about primary mental health care and what factors influence their ratings? Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13: 428-34.
15. Ayanian JZ, Landrum MB, Normand SL, et al. Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography-do practicing physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other? N Engl J Med 1998;338: 1896-904.
16. Campbell SM, Hann M, Roland MO, et al. The effect of panel membership and feedback on ratings in a two-round Delphi survey: results of a randomized controlled trial. Med Care 1999;37: 964-8.
17. Campbell SM, Ludt S, Van Lieshout J, et al. Quality indicators for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care in nine European countries. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2008;15: 509-15.
18. van Althuis TR. Overzicht en definitie van indicatoren voor cardiovasculair risicomanagement bij patienten met bekende hart- en vaatziekten in de huisartsenzorg. 30 juni 2008 http://nhg.artsennet.nl/uri/?uri=AMGATE-6059- 104-TICH-R212795501493078 (accessed 10 Sep 2009).
19. Shekelle PG, Kahan JP, Bernstein SJ, et al. The reproducibility of a method to identify the overuse and underuse of medical procedures. N Engl J Med 1998;338: 1888-95.
20. Kadam UT, Jordan K, Croft PR. A comparison of two consensus methods for classifying morbidities in a single professional group showed the same outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59: 1169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.016.
21. Tobacman JK, Scott Ill, Cyphert ST, et al. Comparison of appropriateness ratings for cataract surgery between convened and mail-only multidisciplinary panels. Med Decis Making 2001;21: 490-7.
22. Pearson SD, Margolis CZ, Davis S, et al. Is consensus reproducible? A study of an algorithmic guidelines development process. Med Care 1995;33: 643-60.
23. Greatorex J, Dexter T. An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study. J Adv Nurs 2000;32: 1016-24.
24. Holey EA, Feeley JL, Dixon J, et al. An exploration of the use of simple statistics to measure consensus and stability in Delphi studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7: 52.
25. Owens C, Ley A, Aitken P. Do different stakeholder groups share mental health research priorities? A four-arm Delphi study. Health Expect 2008;11: 418-31.
26. Nutting PA, Dickinson WP, Dickinson LM, et al. Use of chronic care model elements is associated with higher-quality care for diabetes. Ann Fam Med 2007;5: 14-20.
27. Piatt GA, Orchard TJ, Emerson S, et al. Translating the chronic care model into the community: results from a randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted diabetes care intervention. Diabetes Care 2006;29: 811-17.