EEG responds to conceptual stimuli and corpus semantics

EMNLP 2009 - Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: A Meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of ACL, Held in Conjunction with ACL-IJCNLP 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 619-627

  Murphy, Brian ^a   Baroni, Marco ^a   Poesio, Massimo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; DATA MINING; SEMANTICS;

ACTIVATION PATTERNS; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; CORPUS SEMANTICS; DATA COLLECTION; NEURAL ACTIVATION PATTERNS; RELATIVE PERFORMANCE; SEMANTIC KNOWLEDGE; SEMANTIC REPRESENTATION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 78249265842     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1699571.1699594     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. A. Almuhareb. 2006. Attributes in lexical acquisition. Dissertation, University of Essex.
2. L. Barsalou. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22:577-660.
3. L. Barsalou. 2003. Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18:513-562.
4. J.R. Curran and M. Moens. 2002. Improvements in automatic thesaurus extraction. In Proceedings of SIGLEX, pages 59-66.
5. A. Delorme and S. Makeig. 2003. Eeglab: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial dynamics includingindependent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134:9-21.
6. S. Evert. 2005. The statistics of word cooccurrences. Dissertation, Stuttgart University.
7. Ch. J. Fillmore. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea, editor, Linguistics in the Morning Calm, pages 111-138. Hanshin, Seoul.
8. J. Gilbert, L. Shapiro, and G. Barnes. 2009. Processing of living and nonliving objects diverges in the visual processing system: evidence from meg. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting.
9. M. Kiefer. 2001. Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects in object categorization:event-related potentials during picture and word categorization. Memory and Cognition, 29(1):100-116.
10. T. Landauer and S. Dumais. 1997. A solution to Platos problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2):211-240.
11. A. Lenci. 2009. Argument alternations in italian verbs: a computational study. In Atti del XLII Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana.
12. D. Lin. 1998. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In COLING-ACL98, Montreal, Canada.
13. K. Lund and C. Burgess. 1996. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical cooccurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28:203-208.
14. S. Makeig, A.J. Bell, T. Jung, and T.J. Sejnowski. 1996. Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data. In in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 145-151. MIT Press.
15. A. Martin and L. Chao. 2001. Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 11:194-201.
16. T. Mitchell, S. Shinkareva, A. Carlson, K. Chang, V. Malave, R. Mason, and M. Just. 2008. Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science, 320:1191-1195.
17. B. Murphy, M. Dalponte, M. Poesio, and L. Bruzzone. 2008. Distinguishing concept categories from single-trial electrophysiological activity. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
18. S. Padó and M. Lapata. 2007. Dependency-based construction of semantic space models. Computational Linguistics, 33(2):161-199.
19. G. Pfurtscheller and F. Lopes da Silva. 1999. Eventrelated EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110:1842-1857.
20. F. Pulvermüller. 2002. The neuroscience of language: on brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. F. Pulvermüller. 2005. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6:576-582.
22. J. Pustejovsky. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge.
23. M. Sahlgren. 2006. The Word-Space Model: Using distributional analysis to represent syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations between words in highdimensional vector spaces. Dissertation, Stockholm University.
24. S. Schulte im Walde. 2008. Theoretical adequacy, human data and classification approaches in modelling word properties, word relatedness and word classes. Habilitation, Saarland University.
25. H. Schütze. 1997. Ambiguity Resolution in Natural Language Learning. CSLI, Stanford.