Determinants of barley grain yield in a wide range of Mediterranean environments

Field Crops Research

Volumn 120, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 169-178

  Francia, Enrico ^a   Tondelli, Alessandro ^b   Rizza, Fulvia ^b   Badeck, Franz W ^c   Li Destri Nicosia, Orazio ^d   Akar, Taner ^e   Grando, Stefania ^f   Al Yassin, Adnan ^g   Benbelkacem, Abdelkader ^h   Thomas, William T B ⁱ   van Eeuwijk, Fred ^j   Romagosa, Ignacio ^k   Stanca, A Michele ^a,b   Pecchioni, Nicola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^b CRA   (Italy)

^c POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^d CRA   (Italy)

^e CENTRAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR FIELD CROPS   (Turkey)

^f INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH IN THE DRY AREAS ICARDA   (Syrian Arab Republic)

^g NCARE   (Jordan)

^h Institute Technique des Grandes Cultures Alger   (Algeria)

ⁱ SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^j WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^k UNIVERSITY OF LLEIDA   (Spain)

more..

Author keywords

Barley; Developmental genes; GE interaction; Mediterranean environment; Phenology; Yield adaptation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BARLEY; CROP YIELD; DROUGHT; ECOPHYSIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GROWING SEASON; HARVESTING; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; RAINFALL; VARIANCE ANALYSIS; WATER STRESS; YIELD RESPONSE;

MEDITERRANEAN SEA;

HORDEUM;

EID: 78249258399     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Annicchiarico, P., 2002. Genotype×environment interactions: challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper No. 174. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
2. Araus J.L., Villegas D., Aparicio N., Garcia del Moral L.F., El Hani S., Rharrabti Y., Ferrio J.P., Royo C. Environmental factors determining carbon isotope discrimination and yield in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Crop Sci. 2003, 43:170-180.
3. Arisnabarreta S., Miralles D.J. Critical period for grain number establishment of near isogenic lines of two- and six-rowed barley. Field Crops Res. 2008, 107:196-202.
4. Bingham I.J., Blake J., Foulkes M.J., Spink J. Is barley yield in the UK sink limited? I. Post-anthesis radiation interception, radiation use efficiency and source-sink balance. Field Crops Res. 2007, 101:198-211.
5. Borras G., Romagosa I., van Eeuwijk F., Slafer G.A. Genetic variability in duration of pre-heading phases and relationships with leaf appearance and tillering dynamics in a barley population. Field Crops Res. 2009, 113:95-104.
6. Cattivelli L., Rizza F., Badeck F.-W., Mazzucotelli E., Mastrangelo A.M., Francia E., Marè C., Tondelli A., Stanca A.M. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Res. 2008, 105:1-14.
7. Ceccarelli S., Grando S. Drought as a challenge for the plant breeder. Plant Growth Regul. 1996, 20:149-155.
8. Ceccarelli S., Grando S., Impiglia A. Choice of selection strategy in breeding barley for stress environments. Euphytica 1998, 103:297-318.
9. Chenu K., Chapman S.C., Tardieu F., McLean G., Welcker C., Hammer G.L. Simulating the yield impacts of organ-level quantitative trait loci associated with drought response in maize-a 'gene-to-phenotype' modeling approach. Genetics 2009, 183:1507-1523.
10. Comadran J., Russell J., van Eeuwijk F., Ceccarelli S., Grando S., Baum M., Stanca A., Pecchioni N., Mastrangelo A., Akar T., Al-Yassin A., Benbelkacem A., Choumane W., Ouabbou H., Dahan R., Bort J., Araus J.-L., Pswarayi A., Romagosa I., Hackett C., Thomas W.T.B. Mapping adaptation of barley to droughted environments. Euphytica 2008, 161:35-45.
11. Cooper M., van Eeuwijk F.A., Hammer G.L., Podlich D.W., Messina C. Modeling QTL for complex traits: detection and context for plant breeding. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12:231-240.
12. Corsten L.C.A., Denis J.B. Structuring interaction in two-way tables by clustering. Biometrics 1990, 46:207-215.
13. Cossani C.M., Slafer G.A., Savin R. Yield and biomass in wheat and barley under a range of conditions in a Mediterranean site. Field Crops. Res. 2009, 112(2-3):205-213.
14. Distelfeld A., Li C., Dubcovsky J. Regulation of flowering in temperate cereals. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12:178-184.
15. Francia E., Rizza F., Cattivelli L., Stanca A.M., Galiba G., Toth B., Hayes P.M., Skinner J.S., Pecchioni N. Two loci on chromosome 5H determine low temperature tolerance in a 'Nure' (winter)×'Tremois' (spring) barley map. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 108:670-680.
16. Francia E., Barabaschi D., Tondelli A., Laidò G., Rizza F., Stanca A.M., Busconi M., Fogher C., Stockinger E.J., Pecchioni N. Fine mapping of a HvCBF gene cluster at the frost resistance locus Fr-H2 in barley. Theor Appl Genet. 2007, 115:1083-1091.
17. Gonzalez F.G., Slafer G.A., Miralles D.J. Grain and floret number in response to photoperiod during stem elongation in fully and slightly vernalized wheats. Field Crops Res. 2003, 81:17-27.
18. Kang M.S., Gauch H.G. Genotype-by-Environment Interaction 1996, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
19. Laidò G., Barabaschi D., Tondelli A., Gianinetti A., Stanca A.M., Li Destri Nicosia O., Di Fonzo N., Francia E., Pecchioni N. QTL alleles from a winter feed type can improve malting quality in barley. Plant Breed. 2009, 128:598-605.
20. Laurie D.A., Pratchett N., Benzant J.H., Snape J.W. RFLP mapping of five major genes and eight quantitative trait loci controlling flowering time in a winter×spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cross. Genome 1995, 38:575-585.
21. Miralles D.J., Slafer G.A. Wheat development. Wheat: Ecology and Physiology of Yield Determination 1999, 13-43. Food Product Press, New York. E.H. Satorre, G.A. Slafer (Eds.).
22. Payne R.W., Harding S.A., Murray D.A., Soutar D.M., Baird D.B., Welham S.J., Kane A.F., Gilmour A.R., Thompson R., Webster R., Tunnicliffe Wilson G. GenStat Release 11 Reference Manual, Part 2. Directives 2008, VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK.
23. Pswarayi A., van Eeuwijk F.A., Ceccarelli S., Grando S., Comadran J., Russell J.R., Francia E., Pecchioni N., Li Destri O., Akar T., Al-Yassin A., Benbelkacem A., Choumane W., Karrou M., Ouabbou H., Bort J., Araus J.L., Molina-Cano J.L., Thomas W.T.B., Romagosa I. Barley adaptation and improvement in the Mediterranean basin. Plant Breed. 2008, 127:554-560.
24. Rizza F., Badeck F.-W., Cattivelli L., Lidestri O., Di Fonzo N., Stanca A.M. Use of a water stress index to identify barley genotypes adapted to rainfed and irrigated conditions. Crop Sci. 2004, 44:2127-2137.
25. Romagosa I., van Eeuwijk F.A., Thomas W.T.B. Statistical analyses of genotype by environment data. Cereals. Handbook of Plant Breeding Series 2009, vol. 3:1-41. Springer, New York.
26. Ryan J., Singh M., Pala M. Long-term cereal-based rotation trials in the Mediterranean region: implications for cropping sustainability. Adv. Agron. 2008, 97:273-319. Chapter Seven.
27. Sadras V.O. Evolutionary aspects of the trade-off between seed size and number in crops. Field Crops Res. 2007, 100:125-138.
28. Savin R., Slafer G.A. Shading effects on the yield of an Argentinian wheat cultivar. J. Agric. Sci. 1991, 116:1-7.
29. Schröter D., Cramer W., Leemans R., Prentice I.C., Araújo M.B., Arnell N.W., Bondeau A., Bugmann H., Carter T.R., Gracia C.A., de la Vega-Leinert A.C., Erhard M., Ewert F., Glendining M., House J.I., Kankaanpää S., Klein R.J.T., Lavorel S., Lindner M., Metzger M.J., Meyer J., Mitchell T.D., Reginster I., Rounsevell M., Sabaté S., Sitch S., Smith B., Smith J., Smith P., Sykes M.T., Thonicke K., Thuiller W., Tuck G., Zaehle S., Zierl B. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 2005, 310:1333-1337.
30. Slafer G., Araus J.L., Richards R.A. Promising traits for future breeding to increase wheat yield. Wheat: Ecology and Physiology of Yield Determination 1999, 379-415. Food Product Press, New York. E.H. Satorre, G.A. Slafer (Eds.).
31. Slafer G.A., Araus J.L., Royo C., Garcia del Moral L.F. Promising eco-physiological traits for genetic improvement of cereal yields in Mediterranean environments. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2005, 146:61-70.
32. Slafer G.A., Kantolic A.G., Appendino M.L., Miralles D.J., Savin R. Crop development: genetic control, environmental modulation and relevance for genetic improvement of crop yield. Crop Physiology. Application for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy 2009, 277-308. Academic Press/Elsevier, Oxford, UK. V.O. Sadras, D.F. Calderini (Eds.).
33. Stockinger E.J., Skinner J.S., Gardner K.G., Francia E., Pecchioni N. Expression levels of barley CBF genes at Frost-resistance-H2 are dependent upon alleles at Fr-H1 and Fr-H2. Plant J. 2007, 51:308-321.
34. Szucs P., Skinner J.S., Karsai I., Cuesta-Marcos A., Haggard K.G., Corey A.E., Chen T.H.H., Hayes P.M. Validation of the VRNH2/VRN-H1 epistatic model in barley reveals that intron length variation in VRN-H1 may account for a continuum of vernalization sensitivity. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2007, 277:249-261.
35. Tambussi E.A., Nogues S., Ferrio P., Voltas J., Araus J.L. Does higher yield potential improve barley performance in Mediterranean conditions? A case study. Field Crops Res. 2005, 91:149-160.
36. Tardieu F., Tuberosa R. Dissection and modelling of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13:206-212.
37. Tondelli A., Francia E., Barabaschi D., Aprile A., Skinner J.S., Stockinger E.J., Stanca A.M., Pecchioni N. Mapping regulatory genes as candidates for cold and drought stress tolerance in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 112:445-454.
38. Tuberosa R., Salvi S. Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11:405-412.
39. Turner A., Beales J., Faure S., Dunford R.P., Laurie D.A. The Pseudo-Response Regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley. Science 2005, 310:1031-1034.
40. Ugarte C., Calderini D.F., Slafer G.A. Grain weight and grain number responsiveness to pre-anthesis temperature in wheat, barley and triticale. Field Crops Res. 2007, 100:240-248.
41. van Eeuwijk F.A., Denis J.-B., Kang M.S. Incorporating additional information on genotypes and environments in models for two-way genotype by environment tables. Genotype-by-Environment Interaction: New Perspectives 1996, 15-49. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. M.S. Kang, H.G. Gauch (Eds.).
42. van Eeuwijk F. Genotype by environment interaction-basics and beyond. Plant Breeding: The Arnel R. Hallauer International Symposium 2006, 155-170. Blackwell Publishing. K.R. Lamkey, M. Lee (Eds.).
43. van Oosterom J., Kleijn D., Ceccarelli S., Nachit M.M. Genotype-by-environment interactions of barley in the Mediterranean region. Crop Sci. 1993, 33:669-674.
44. Voltas J., Romagosa I., Lafarga A., Armesto A.P., Sombrero A., Araus J.L. Genotype by environment interaction for grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination of barley in Mediterranean Spain. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1999, 50:1263-1271.
45. Voltas J., van Eeuwijk F., Igartua E., Garcia del Moral L.F., Molina Cano J.L., Romagosa I. Genotype by environment interaction and adaptation in barley breeding: basic concepts and methods of analysis. Barley Science. Recent Advances from Molecular Biology to Agronomy of Yield and Quality 2002, 205-242. Food Product Press, Binghamton, NY. Slafer (Ed.).
46. von Zitzewitz J., Szucs P., Dubcovsky J., Yan L., Francia E., Pecchioni N., Casas A., Chen T.H.H., Hayes P.M., Skinner J.S. Structural and functional characterization of barley vernalization genes. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 59:449-467.
47. Yan W., Cornelius P.L., Crossa J., Hunt L.A. Two types of GGE biplots for analyzing multi-environment trial data. Crop Sci. 2001, 41:656-663.
48. Yan W., Kang M.S., Baoluo Ma B., Woods S., Cornelius P.L. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci. 2007, 47:643-653.
49. Zadoks J.C., Chang T.T., Konzak C.F. A decimal code for the growth stage of cereals. Weed Res. 1974, 14:415-421.