EnKF-MCMC

72nd European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference and Exhibition 2010: A New Spring for Geoscience. Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2010

Volumn 4, Issue , 2010, Pages 2423-2441

  Emerick, Alexandre A ^a   Reynolds, Albert C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; KALMAN FILTERS; MARKOV PROCESSES; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT;

ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER; ENSEMBLE SQUARE ROOT FILTER; FUTURE PERFORMANCE; MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRODUCTION FORECASTS; RESERVOIR MODELING; RESERVOIR PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION VARIABLES;

MONTE CARLO METHODS;

EID: 78249258112     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2523/131375-ms     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Aanonsen, S. I., G. Naevdal, D. S. Oliver, A. C. Reynolds, and B. Vallés, Review of ensemble Kalman filter in petroleum engineering (SPE 117724), SPE Journal, 14(3), 393-412, 2009.
2. Andrews, A., A square root formulation of the Kalman covariance equations, AIAA, (6), 1165-1168, 1968.
3. Bonet-Cunha, L., D. S. Oliver, R. A. Redner, and A. C. Reynolds, Hybrid Markov chain Monte Carlo method for generating permeability fields conditioned to multiwell pressure data and prior information, SPEJ, 11(3), 261-271, 1998.
4. Burgers, G., P. J. van Leeuwen, and G. Evensen, Analysis scheme in the ensemble Kalman filter, Monthly Weather Review, 126, 1719-1724, 1998.
5. Chu, L., A. C. Reynolds, and D. S. Oliver, Computation of sensitivity coefficients for conditioning the permeability field to well-test data, In Situ, 19(2), 179-223, 1995.
6. Damiani, M. C, Determinacao de padroes de fluxo em simulames de reservatorio de petroleo utilizando tracadores (in Portuguese), Master's thesis, Universidade do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2007.
7. Efendiev, Y., A. Datta-Gupta, V. Ginting, X. Ma, and B. Mallick, An efficent two-stage Markov chain Monte Carlo mehod for dynamic data integration, SPE Journal, 41, 2005.
8. Efendiev, Y., T. Hou, and W. Luo, Preconditioning Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations using coarse-scale models, SIAM J. Sci. Comput, pp. 776-803, 2006.
9. Emerick, A. and A. Reynolds, Combining sensitivities and prior information for covariance localization in the ensemble Kalman filter for petroleum reservoir applications, Computational Geociences - paper accepted for publication, 2010.
10. Evensen, G., Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics, Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, 10,143-10,162, 1994.
11. Evensen, G., Sampling strategies and square root analysis schemes for EnKF, Tech. rep., Hydro Research Center and Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, 2004.
12. Feller, W., An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications: Volume I, third edn., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1968.
13. Gaspari, G. and S. E. Cohn, Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 125(554), 723-757, 1999.
14. Hastings, W. K., Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika, 57(1), 97-109, 1970.
15. Houtekamer, P. L. and H. L. Mitchell, Data assimilation using an ensemble kalman filtering technique, Monthly Weather Review, 126, 796-811, 1998.
16. Kalman, R. E., A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems, Transactions of he ASME, Journal of Basic Engineering, 82, 35-45, 1960.
17. Liu, N. and D. S. Oliver, Evaluation of Monte Carlo methods for assessing uncertainty, SPE Journal, 8(2), 188-195, 2003.
18. Ma, X., M. Al-Harbi, A. Datta-Gupta, and Y. Efendiev, An efficent two-stage sampling method for uncertainty quantification in history matching geological models, SPE Journal, 13(1), 77-87, 2008a.
19. Ma, X., A. Datta-Gupta, and Y. Efendiev, An multistage MCMC with nonparametric error model for efficient uncertainty quantification in history matching, SPE 115911, in Proceedings of SPE ATCE, p. 17, 2008b.
20. Metropolis, N., A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines, J. Chem. Physics, 21, 1087-1092, 1953.
21. Nummelin, E., MC's for MCMCists, International Statistical Review, pp. 215-240, 2002.
22. Oliver, D. S., Incorporation of transient pressure data into reservoir characterization, In Situ, 18(3), 243-275, 1994.
23. Oliver, D. S., L. B. Cunha, and A. C. Reynolds, Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for conditioning a permeability field to pressure data, Mathematical Geology, 29(1), 61-91, 1997.
24. Oliver, D. S., A. C. Reynolds, and N. Liu, Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008.
25. Ripley, B. D., Stochastic Simulation, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987.
26. Sakov, P. and P. R. Oke, Implications of the form of the ensemble transformation in the ensemble square root filters, Monthly Weather Review, p. (in press), 2008.
27. Tjulin, K., G. Li, S. I. Aanonsen, and A. C. Reynolds, Estimation of initial fluid contacts by assimilation of production data with EnKF (SPE 109975), in Proceedings of the 2007 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2007.
28. Tierney, L., Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions, Annals of Statistics, pp. 1701-1728, 1994.
29. Tippett, M. K., J. L. Anderson, C. H. Bishop, T. M. Hamill, and J. S. Whitaker, Ensemble square-root filters, Monthly Weather Review, 131, 1485-1490, 2003.
30. Wang, Y., G. Li, and A. Reynolds, Estimation of depths of fluid contacts by history matching using iterative ensemble Kalman smoothers (SPE 119056), in Proc. of the 2009 SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium in The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 2-4 February 2009, 2009.
31. Whitaker, J. S. and T. M. Hamill, Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations, Monthly Weather Review, 130(7), 1913-1924, 2002.