Outcome of induction of labour using maternal characteristics, ultrasound assessment and biochemical state of the cervix

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1406-1412

  Cheung, Chun Wai ^a   Leung, Tak Yeung ^a   Sahota, Daljit Singh ^a   Chan, Oi Ka ^a   Chan, Lin Wai ^a   Fung, Tak Yuen ^a   Lau, Tze Kin ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Bishop score; cervical length; IGFBP 1; Induction of labour; prediction

Indexed keywords

SOMATOMEDIN BINDING PROTEIN 1;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; BISHOP SCORE; BODY POSITION; CERVICAL LENGTH MEASUREMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL IMAGING; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FETAL OCCIPITAL POSITION; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; LABOR INDUCTION; MACROSOMIA; MATERNAL BEHAVIOR; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; OLIGOHYDRAMNIOS; PREDICTION; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX MUCUS; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; CERVIX UTERI; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR BINDING PROTEIN 1; LABOR, INDUCED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PARITY; PHOSPHORYLATION; PREGNANCY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 78249254542     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767051003678135     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Gudex G. Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2; a prospective audit. NZ Med J 1993;106:78-80.
2. Royal College ofObstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Induction of labour. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 9. London: RCOG Press; 2001.
3. Bishop E. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964;24:266-268.
4. Lange AP, Secher NJ, Westergaard JG, Skovard IB. Prelabor evaluation ofinducibility. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:137-147.
5. Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ. The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:214-218.
6. Roman H, Verspyck E, Vercoustre L, Degre S, Col JY, Firmin JM, Caron P, Marpeau L. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction offailed labor induction? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:357-362.
7. Gabriel R, Darnaud T, Chalot F, Gonzalez N, Leymarie F, Quereux C. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19: 254-257.
8. Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:538-549.
9. Ware V, Raynor BD. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor ofsuccessful labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1030-1032.
10. Bueno B, San-Frutos L, Salazar F, Perez-Medina T, Engels V, Archilla B, et al. Variables that predict the success of labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84: 1093-1097.
11. Bartha JL, Romero-Carmona R, Martinez-Del-Fresno P, Comino-Delgado R. Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasound for preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized clinical trial, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:155-159. (Pubitemid 40299023)
12. Peregrine E, O'Brien P, Omar R, Jauniaux E. Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction oflabor. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107: 227-233.
13. Eggebø TM, Heien C, Okland I, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:199-204.
14. Keepanasseril A, Suri V, Bagga R, Aggarwal N. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction oflabour in nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;47:389-393.
15. Gonen R, Degani S, Ron A. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultraso-nography and Bishop score. Eur J Ultrasound 1998;7:183-187.
16. Chandra S, Crane JM, Hutchens D, Young DC Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:2-6.
17. Rozenberg P, Chevret S, Chastang C, Ville Y. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score. BJOG 2005;112:192-196.
18. Reis FM, Gervasi MT, Florio P, Bracalente G, Fadalti M, Severi FM, et al. Prediction ofsuccessful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1361-1367.
19. Crane JM, Delaney T, Butt KD, Bennett KA, Hutchens D, Young DC Predictors ofsuccessful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;15:319-323.
20. Park KH. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measure-ment in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women. J Korean Med Sci 2007;22:722-727.
21. Rutanen EM, Karkkainen TH, Lehtovirta J, Uotila JT, Hinkula MK, Hartikainen AL. Evaluation of a rapid strip test for insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in the diagnosis of ruptured fetal membranes. Clin Chim Acta 1996;253:91-101.
22. Nuutila M, Hiilesmaa V, Karkkainen T, Ylikorkala O, Rutanen EM. Phosphorylated isoforms of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in the cervix as a predictor ofcervical ripeness. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:243-249.
23. Kekki M, Kurki T, Karkkainen T, Hiilesmaa V, Paavonen J, Rutanen EM. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 in cervical secretion as a predictor of preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80:546-551.
24. Lembet A, Eroglu D, Ergin T, Kuscu E, Zeyneloglu H, Batioglu S, et al. New rapid bed-side test to predict preterm delivery: phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in cervical secretions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:706-712.
25. Akercan F, Kazandi M, Sendag F, Cirpan T, Mgoyi L, Terek MC, et al. Value ofcervical phosphorylated insulinlike growth factor binding protein-1 in the prediction ofpreterm labor. J Reprod Med 2004;49:368-372.
26. Akercan F, Cirpan T, Kazandi M, Terek MC, Mgoyi L, Ozkinay E. The value ofthe insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in the cervical-vaginal secretion detected by immunochromatographic dipstick test in the prediction of delivery in women with clinically unconfirmed preterm premature rupture of membranes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;121:159-163.
27. Sonek J, Shellhaas C. Cervical sonography: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:71-78.
28. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 31. London: RCOG Press; 2002.
29. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-845.
30. Crane JM. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:573-584.
31. Leung TY, Fok WY, Chan LW, Law LW, Lau TK. Prediction of intrapartum Cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal status after a successful external cephalic version by a low pre-version pulsatility index of the fetal middle cerebral artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27: 416-419.
32. Lam H, Leung WC, Lee CP, Lao TT. The use of fetal Doppler cerebroplacental blood flow and amniotic fluid volume measurement in the surveillance of postdated pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:844-848.