Other tetraploid species and conspecific diploids as sources of genetic variation for an autotetraploid

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 97, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1858-1866

  Stift, Marc ^a,b   Bregman, Rob ^b   Oostermeijer, J Gerard B ^b   van Tienderen, Peter H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Flow cytometry; Hybridization; Introgression; Minority cytotype exclusion; Polyploidization; Unreduced gametes

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIAN; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; HERB; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION; MUTATION; POLYPLOIDY;

AMPHIBIA; TETRA;

EID: 78249252654     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000048     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Anderson, E., and G. L. Stebbins. 1954. Hybridization as an evolutionary stimulus. Evolution 8: 378-388.
2. Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
3. Arnold, M. L., J. L. Hamrick, and B. D. Bennett. 1993. Interspecific pollen competition and reproductive isolation in Iris. Journal of Heredity 84: 13-16.
4. Bleeker, W., and H. Hurka. 2001. Introgressive hybridization in Rorippa (Brassicaceae): Gene flow and its consequences in natural and anthropogenic habitats. Molecular Ecology 10: 2013-2022.
5. Blom, C. W. P. M. 1999. Adaptations to flooding stress: from plant community to molecule. Plant Biology 1: 261-273.
6. Bretagnolle, F., and J. D. Thompson. 1995. Tansley Review no. 78: Gametes with the somatic chromosome-number - Mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution of autopolyploid plants. New Phytologist 129: 1-22.
7. Brown, A. H. D., and A. G. Young. 2000. Genetic diversity in tetraploid populations of the endangered daisy Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides and implications for its conservation. Heredity 85: 122-129.
8. Burton, T. L., and B. C. Husband. 2000. Fitness differences among diploids, tetraploids, and their triploid progeny in Chamerion angus-tifolium: Mechanisms of inviability and implications for polyploid evolution. Evolution 54: 1182-1191.
9. Burton, T. L., and B. C. Husband. 2001. Fecundity and offspring ploidy in matings among diploid, triploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae): Consequences for tetraploid establishment. Heredity 87: 573-582.
10. Carney, S. E., and M. L. Arnold. 1997. Differences in pollen-tube growth rate and reproductive isolation between Louisiana irises. Journal of Heredity 88: 545-549.
11. deWet, J. M. J. 1980. Origins of polyploids. In W. H. Lewis [ed.], Polyploidy: biological relevance. Plenum Press, New York, New York, USA.
12. Diaz, A., and M. R. Macnair. 1999. Pollen tube competition as a mechanism of prezygotic reproductive isolation between Mimulus nasu-tus and its presumed progenitor M-guttatus. New Phytologist 144: 471-478.
13. Emms, S. K., S. A. Hodges, and M. L. Arnold. 1996. Pollen-tube competition, siring success, and consistent asymmetric hybridization in Louisiana irises. Evolution 50: 2201-2206.
14. Eriksson, O., and A. Jakobsson. 1999. Recruitment trade-offs and the evolution of dispersal mechanisms in plants. Evolutionary Ecology 13: 411-423.
15. Grant, V. 1981. Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
16. Haig, D., and M. Westoby. 1991. Genomic imprinting in endosperm- Its effect on seed development in crosses between species, and between different ploidies of the same species, and its implications for the evolution of apomixis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 333: 1-13.
17. Hardy, O. J., M. De Loose, X. Vekemans, and P. Meerts. 2001. Allozyme segregation and inter-cytotype reproductive barriers in the polyploid complex Centaurea jacea. Heredity 87: 136-145.
18. Hardy, O. J., and X. Vekemans. 2001. Patterns of allozyme variation in diploid and tetraploid Centaurea jacea at different spatial scales. Evolution 55: 943-954.
19. Harlan, J., and J. M. J. deWet. 1975. On Ö. Winge and a prayer: The origins of polyploidy. Botanical Review 41: 361-390.
20. Husband, B. C. 2000. Constraints on polyploid evolution: A test of the minority cytotype exclusion principle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 267: 217-223.
21. Husband, B. C., and H. A. Sabara. 2004. Reproductive isolation between autotetraploids and their diploid progenitors in fireweed, Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). New Phytologist 161: 703-713.
22. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 2000. Ecological mechanisms of reproductive isolation between diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium. Journal of Ecology 88: 689-701.
23. Husband, B. C., D. W. Schemske, T. L. Burton, and C. Goodwillie 2002. Pollen competition as a unilateral reproductive barrier between sympatric Chamerion angustifolium. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 269: 2565-2571.
24. Jalas, J., and J. Suominen. 1994. Atlas Flora Europaeae, vol. 12. Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe, Helsinki, Finland.
25. Jarolimova, V. 2005. Experimental hybridization of species in the genus Rorippa. Preslia 77: 277-296.
26. Johnston, S. A., T. P. M. den Nijs, S. J. Peloquin, and R. E. Hanneman 1980. The significance of genic balance to endosperm development in interspecific crosses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 57: 5-9.
27. Jonsell, B. 1968. Studies in the North-West European species of Rorippa s. str. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 19: 1-221.
28. Karpechenko, G. D. 1927. The production of polyploid gametes in hybrids. Hereditas 9: 349-368.
29. Levin, D. A. 1975. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon 24: 35-43.
30. Luttikhuizen, P. C., M. Stift, P. Kuperus, and P. H. Van Tienderen 2007. Genetic diversity in diploid vs. tetraploid Rorippa amphibia (Brassicaceae). Molecular Ecology 16: 3544-3553.
31. Marks, G. E. 1966. The origin and significance of intraspecific poly-ploidy: Experimental evidence from Solanum chacoense. Evolution 20: 552-557.
32. Meimberg, H., K. J. Rice, N. F. Milan, C. C. Njoku, and J. K. McKay 2009. Multiple origins promote the ecological amplitude of al-lopolyploid Aegilops (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 96: 1262-1273.
33. Moles, A. T., and M. Westoby. 2006. Seed size and plant strategy across the whole life cycle. Oikos 113: 91-105.
34. Moody, M. E., L. D. Mueller, and D. E. Soltis. 1993. Genetic variation and random drift in autotetraploid populations. Genetics 134: 649-657.
35. Mosquin, T. 1967. Evidence for autopolyploidy in Epilobium angustifo-lium (Onagraceae). Evolution 21: 713-719.
36. Nishiyama, I., and N. Inomata. 1966. Embryological studies on cross-incompatibility between 2x and 4x in Brassica. Japanese Journal of Genetics 41:27-42.
37. Otto, S. P., and J. Whitton. 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 34: 401-437.
38. Ramsey, J., and D. W. Schemske. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in fl owering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 467-501.
39. Rieseberg, L. H. 1997. Hybrid origins of plant species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 359-389.
40. Rieseberg, L. H., A. M. Desrochers, and S. J. Youn. 1995. Interspecifi c pollen competition as a reproductive barrier between sympatric species of Helianthus (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 515-519.
41. Segraves, K. A., and J. N. Thompson. 1999. Plant polyploidy and pollination: Floral traits and insect visits to diploid and tetraploid Heuchera grossulariifolia. Evolution 53: 1114-1127.
42. Soltis, D. E., and P. S. Soltis. 1989. Genetic consequences of auto-polyploidy in Tolmiea (Saxifragaceae). Evolution 43: 586-594.
43. Soltis, D. E., and P. S. Soltis. 1993. Molecular data and the dynamic nature of polyploidy. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 12: 243-273.
44. Soltis, P. S. 2005. Ancient and recent polyploidy in angiosperms. New Phytologist 166: 5-8.
45. Soltis, P. S., and D. E. Soltis. 2000. The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 7051-7057.
46. Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
47. Stebbins, G. L. 1985. Polyploidy, hybridization, and the invasion of new habitats. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 72: 824-832.
48. Stift, M. 2007. Polyploidy and hybridisation in the Rorippa x an-ceps hybrid complex. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
49. Stift, M., C. Berenos, P. Kuperus, and P. H. van Tienderen. 2008a. Segregation models for disomic, tetrasomic and intermediate inheritance in tetraploids: A general procedure applied to Rorippa (Yellow cress) microsatellite data. Genetics 179: 2113-2123.
50. Stift, M., P. C. Luttikhuizen, E. J. W. Visser, and P. H. van Tienderen 2008b. Different flooding responses in Rorippa amphibia and Rorippa sylvestris, and their modes of expression in F-1 hybrids. New Phytologist 180: 229-239.
51. Swanson, R., A. F. Edlund, and D. Preuss. 2004. Species specifi city in pollen-pistil interactions. Annual Review of Genetics 3 8: 793-818.
52. Van Dijk, P., and W. Van Delden. 1990. Evidence for autotetraploidy in Plantago media and comparisons between natural and artificial cyto-types concerning cell-size and fertility. Heredity 65: 349-357.