Documenting organisational development in general practice using a group-based assessment method: The Maturity Matrix

Quality and Safety in Health Care

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Eriksson, Tina ^a   Siersma, Volkert Dirk ^a   Loøgstrup, Louise ^a   Buch, Martin Sandberg ^b   Elwyn, Glyn ^c   Edwards, Adrian ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b Dansk Sundhedsinstitut   (Denmark)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENMARK; GENERAL PRACTICE; GROUP PROCESS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

DENMARK; FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL; GENERAL PRACTICE; GROUP PROCESSES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 78249246634     PISSN: 14753898     EISSN: 14753901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2009.033787     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. O'Neill M, Cowman S. Partners in care: investigating community nurses' understanding of an interdisciplinary team-based approach to primary care. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:3004-11.
2. Rhydderch M, Elwyn G, Marshall M, et al. Organisational change theory and the use of indicators in general practice. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:213-17.
3. Westrum R. A typology of organisational cultures. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13 (Suppl 2):ii22-7.
4. Tapp L, Edwards A, Braspenning J, et al. Developing organisational maturity: considering the role of culture typologies for primary care practices. Educ Prim Care 2008;19:1-12.
5. Elwyn G, Rhydderch M, Edwards A, et al. Assessing organisational development in primary medical care using a group based assessment: the Maturity Matrix. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:287-94.
6. Elwyn G, Bekkers MJ, Tapp L, et al. Facilitating organisational development using a group-based formative assessment and benchmarking method: design and implementation of the International Family Practice Maturity Matrix. Qual SafHealth Care 2010. Forthcoming.
7. Davies AP. Influence diagrams for causal modeling and inference. Int Stat Rev 2002;70:161-89.
8. Davis JA. A partial coefficient for Goodman and Kruskal's gamma. J Am Stat Assoc 1967;62:189-93.
9. Logstrup L, Edwards A, Waldorff FB, et al. GP and staff evaluation of the Maturity Matrix as a tool to assess and improve organizational development in primary care. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2009;22:686-700.
10. Buch MS, Edwards A, Eriksson T. Participants' evaluation of a group based organisational assessment tool in Danish General Practice: the Maturity Matrix. Qual Prim Care 2009;17:311-22.
11. Rhydderch M, Edwards A, Marshall M, et al. Maturity Matrix: a criterion validity study of an instrument to assess organisational development in European general practice. Qual Prim Care 2006;14:133-4.
12. Campbell SM, Cantrill JA, Roberts D. Prescribing indicators for UK general practice: Delphi consultation study. BMJ 2000;321:425-8.
13. Buetow SA, Wellingham J. Accreditation of general practices: challenges and lessons. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:129-35.
14. Gillon M, Buetow S, Wellingham J, et al. A practical approach to quality improvement: the experience of the RNZCGP practice standards validation field trial. N Z Med J 2003;116:U682.
15. Macfarlane F, Greenhalgh T, Schofield T, et al. RCGP quality team development programme: an illuminative evaluation. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:356-62.
16. Atkinson K, Jackson C, Rawlin M. Competence and the quality framework. Aust Fam Physician 2007;36:24-6.
17. VanSuch M, Naessens JM, Stroebel RJ, et al. Effect of discharge instructions on readmission of hospitalised patients with heart failure: do all of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations heart failure core measures reflect better care? Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:414-17.
18. Engels Y, Campbell S, Dautzenberg M, et al. Developing a framework of, and quality indicators for, general practice management in Europe. Fam Pract 2005;22:215-22.
19. Geboers H, van der HM, Mokkink H, et al. Setting up improvement projects in small scale primary care practices: feasibility of a model for continuous quality improvement. Qual Health Care 1999;8:36-42.
20. Engels Y, Van den HP, Mokkink H, et al. The effects of a team-based continuous quality improvement intervention on the management of primary care: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2006;56:781-7.
21. Engels Y, Dautzenberg M, Campbell S, et al. Testing a European set of indicators for the evaluation of the management of primary care practices. Fam Pract 2006;23:137-47.