Porous liquid marble shell offers possibilities for gas detection and gas reactions

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 165, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 347-353

  Tian, Junfei ^a   Arbatan, Tina ^a   Li, Xu ^a   Shen, Wei ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Gas reaction; Gas sensing; Liquid marble; Porous layer; Superhydrophobic

Indexed keywords

GAS REACTION; GAS SENSING; LIQUID MARBLE; POROUS LAYERS; SUPERHYDROPHOBIC;

CHEMICAL DETECTION; ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSORS; GAS COOLED REACTORS; GAS DETECTORS; HYDROPHOBICITY; INDICATORS (CHEMICAL); MARBLE; SENSORS; SHELLS (STRUCTURES); VAPORS;

LIQUIDS;

EID: 78149500932     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.06.036     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aussillous P., Quéré D., Liquid Marbles Nature 2001, 411:924-927.
2. Bormashenko E., Bormashenko Y., Musin A. Water rolling and floating upon water: marbles supported by a water/marble interface. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 333:419-421.
3. Bormashenko E., Bormashenko Y., Musin A., Barkay Z. On the mechanism of floating and sliding of liquid marbles. ChemPhysChem 2009, 10:654-656.
4. Gao L., McCarthy T.J. Ionic liquid marbles. Langmuir 2007, 23:10445-10447.
5. Aussillous P., Quéré D. Properties of liquid marbles. Proc. R. Soc. 2006, 462:973-999.
6. McEleney P., Walker G.M., Larmour I.A., Bell S.E.J. Liquid marble formation using hydrophobic and super-hydrophobic powders. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 147:373-382.
7. Dandan M., Erbil H.Y. Evaporation rate of graphite liquid marbles: comparison with water droplets. Langmuir 2009, 25:8362-8367.
8. Eshtiaghi N., Liu J.S., Shen W., Hapgood K.P. Liquid marble formation: spreading coefficients or kinetic energy?. Powder Technol. 2009, 196:126-132.
9. Hapgood K.P., Farber L., Michaels J.N. Agglomeration of hydrophobic powders via solid spreading nucleation. Powder Technol. 2009, 188:248-254.
10. Nguyen T.H., Hapgood K., Shen W. Observation of the liquid marble morphology using confocal microscopy. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 162:396-405.
11. Zhang C., Xu J., Ma W., Zheng W. PCR microfluidic devices for DNA amplification. Biotechnol. Adv. 2006, 24:243-284.
12. Bormashenko E., Pogreb R., Whyman G., Musin A., Bormashenko Y., Barkay Z. Shape, vibration, and effective surface tension of water marbles. Langmuir 2009, 25:1893-1896.
13. Bormashenko E., Pogreb R., Bormashenko Y., Musin A., Stein T. New investigation on ferrofluidics; ferrofluidic marbles and magnetic field driven drops on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 2008, 24:12119-12122.
14. Fujii S., Kameyama S., Armes S.P., Dupin D., Suzaki M., Nakamura Y. pH-responsive liquid marbles stabilized with poly(2-vinylpyridine) particles. Soft Matter 2010, 6:635-640.
15. 4 nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22:707-710.
16. Kim S.-H., Lee S.Y., Yang S.-M. Janus microspheres for a highly flexible and impregnable water-repelling interface. Angew. Chem. 2010, 49:2535-2538.
17. Tian J., Arbatan T., Li X., Shen W. Liquid marble for gas sensing. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46:4734-4736.
18. Laden P. Chemistry and Technology of Water Based Inks 1997, Chapman & Hall, London.
19. Li X., Tian J., Shen W. Quantitative biomarker assay with microfluidic paper-based analytical devices Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 396:495-501.
20. Jackson T. Chemistry Ideas 2000, Heinemann Education Publishers, Bath. 2nd edn.
21. Overly C.C., Lee K.D., Berthiaume E., Hollenbeck P.J. Quantitative measurement of intraorganelle pH in the endosomal-lysosomal pathway in neurons by using ratiometric imaging with pyranine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:3156-3160.
22. Adams J.M., Dolin P.A. Printing Technology 2002, Delmar, New York. 5th ed.
23. Leach R.H., Pierce R.J. The Printing Ink Manual 1999, Kluwer Adademic Publishers, Dordrecht. 5th ed.
24. Kumbhar A.G., Kishore K. Redox reactions of Cu(II)-amine complexes in aqueous solutions. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2003, 66:275-280.
25. http://www.vp-scientific.com/Chemical-Resistance-Chart.htm.