Bureaucracy, Democracy and Exclusion: Why Indigenous Knowledge Holders Have a Hard Time Being Taken Seriously

Qualitative Sociology

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 513-531

  Marlor, Chantelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE FRASER VALLEY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alternative ways of knowing; Political transparency; Privilege; Replication; Standardization

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149498062     PISSN: 01620436     EISSN: 15737837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11133-010-9168-7     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baird, R. W. (2000). The killer whale: Foraging specializations and group hunting. In J. Mann, R. C. Connor, P. L. Tyack, & H. Whitehead (eds.), Cetacean societies: Field studies of dolphins and whales (pp. 127-153). University of Chicago Press.
2. Berkes, F. (1993). Traditional ecological knowledge in perspective. In J. T. Inglis (Ed.) Traditional ecological knowledge: Concepts and cases. International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge International Development Research Centre.
3. Bloor, M. (2000). The South Wales Miners Federation, Miners' Lung and the instrumental use of expertise, 1900-1950. Social Studies of Science, 30, 125-140.
4. Boesch, C. (1994). Chimpanzees-red colobus monkeys: A predator-prey system. Animal Behavior, 47, 1135-1148.
5. Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32, 235-296.
6. Conor, R. C., Wells, R. S., Mann, J., & Read, A. J. (2000). The bottlenose dolphin: Social relationships in a fission-fusion society. In J. Mann, R. C. Connor, P. L. Tyack, & H. Whitehead (eds.) Cetacean societies: Field studies of dolphins and whales (pp. 91-126). University of Chicago Press.
7. Curio, E. (1988). Cultural transmission of enemy recognition by birds. In T. R. Zentall, & B. G. Galef, Jr. (eds.) Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives (pp. 75-97). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Daston, L. (1992). Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Social Studies of Science, 22, 597-618.
9. Ellis, S. (2005). Meaningful consideration? A review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making. Arctic, 58, 66-77.
10. Epstein, S. (1995). The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology and Human Values, 20, 408-437.
11. Espeland, W. (2000). Bureaucratizing democracy, democratizing bureaucracy. Law and Social Inquiry, 25, 1077-1109.
12. Evans, R., & Plows, A. (2007). Listening without prejudice? Re-discovering the value of the disinterested citizen. Social Studies of Science, 37, 827-853.
13. Fairhead, J., & Leach, M. (1996). Misreading the African landscape: Society and ecology in a forest-savanna mosaic. Cambridge University Press.
14. Finlayson, A. C. (1994). Fishing for truth: A sociological analysis of northern cod stock assessments from 1977-1990. Institute of Social and Economic Research.
15. Gillespie, G. E., & Kronlund, A. R. (1999). A manual for intertidal clam surveys. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2270.
16. Grigorescu, A. (2003). International organizations and government transparency: Linking the international and domestic realms. International Studies Quarterly, 47, 643-667.
17. Habermas, J. (1975 [1973]). Legitimation crisis. Translated by T. McCarthy. Beacon Press.
18. Hutchings, J. A., Walters, C., & Haedrich, R. L. (1997). Is scientific inquiry incompatible with government information control? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 54, 1198-1210.
19. Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisors as policymakers. Harvard University Press.
20. Keller, A. C. (2009). Science in environmental policy: The politics of objective advice. MIT Press.
21. Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Tutton, R. (2007). Shifting subject positions: Experts and lay people in public dialogue. Social Studies of Science, 37, 385-411.
22. Knorr Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Pergamon.
23. Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press.
24. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.
25. Lorde, A. (2007). The Master's tools will never dismantle the Master's house. In Sister outsider: Essays and speeches by Audre Lorde. The Crossing Press.
26. Lynch, M. P. (1991). Method: Measurement-ordinary and scientific measurement as ethnomethodological phenomena. In G. Button (Ed.) Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 77-108). Cambridge University Press.
27. McCay, B. J. (1989). Co-management of a clam revitalization project: The New Jersey "Spawner sanctuary" program. In E. Pinkertson (Ed.) Co-operative management of local fisheries (pp. 103-124). University of British Columbia Press.
28. Nadasdy, P. (1999). The politics of TEK: Power and the "integration" of knowledge. Arctic Anthropology, 362, 1-18.
29. Nadasdy, P. (2003). Re-evaluating the co-management success story. Arctic, 4, 367-380.
30. Ozonoff, D. (1988)). Failed warning: Asbestos-related disease and industrial medicine. In Bayer (Ed.) The health and safety of workers (pp. 139-218). Oxford University Press.
31. Paolisso, M. (2000). Blue crabs and controversy on the Chesapeake Bay: A cultural model for understanding watermen's reasoning about blue crab management. Human Organization, 61, 226-239.
32. Philp, M. (2009). Delimiting democratic accountability. Political Studies, 57, 28-53.
33. Popay, J., & Williams, G. (1996). Public health research and lay knowledge. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 759-768.
34. Porter, T. M. (1992a). Objectivity as standardization: The rhetoric of impersonality in measurement, statistics, and cost-benefit analysis. In A. Megill (Ed.) Rethinking objectivity (pp. 197-238). Duke University Press.
35. Porter, T. M. (1992b). Quantification and the accounting ideal in science. Social Studies of Science, 22, 633-652.
36. Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
37. Rayner, S. (2003). Democracy in the age of assessment: Reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making. Science and Public Policy, 30, 163-170.
38. Rayner, S., & Malone, E. (1998). The challenge of climate change to the social sciences. In S. Rayner & E. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change: volume 4. What have we learned? Battelle Press.
39. Relly, J., & Sabharwal, M. (2009). Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: A cross-national study. Government of Information Quarterly, 26, 148-157.
40. Roepstorff, A. (2000). The double interface of environmental knowledge: Fishing for Greenland halibut. In B. Neis & L. Felt (Eds.) Finding our sea legs: Linking fishery people and their knowledge within science and management (pp. 165-188). ISER.
41. Shapin, S. (1995). A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. University of Chicago Press.
42. Smith, D. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Alta Mira Press.
43. Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (1997). Standardization in action: Achieving local universality through medical protocols. Social Studies of Science, 272, 273-305.
44. Wynne, B. (1989). Sheep farming after Chernobyl: A case study in communicating scientific information. Environment, 31, 10-15 and 33-39.
45. Yapa, L. (1993). What are improved seeds? An epistemology of the Green Revolution. Economic Geography, 69, 254-273.