The effect of different historical emissions datasets on emission targets of the sectoral mitigation approach Triptych

Climate Policy

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 684-704

  Hof, Andries F ^a   Den Elzen, Michel G J ^a  

^a PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Burden sharing; Climate change; GHG emissions; Historical emissions; Mitigation; National targets; Sectoral targets; Triptych

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; DATA SET; DEVELOPING WORLD; EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GAS; MITIGATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 78149491575     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3763/cpol.2009.0649     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baron, R., Reinaud, J., Genasci, M., Philibert, C., 2007, Sectoral approaches to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Exploring Issues for Heavy Industry, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency (OECD/IEA), Paris.
2. 2 emission reduction among European Union Member States', Discussion paper, in: Informal Workshop for the European Union Ad Hoc Group on Climate, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Zeist, The Netherlands.
3. Bodansky, D., 2004, International Climate Efforts Beyond 2012: A Survey of Approaches, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA.
4. Bouwman, A.F., Kram, T., Klein Goldewijk, K., 2006, Integrated Modelling of Global Environmental Change: An Overview of IMAGE 2.4, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
5. Delhotal, K.C., DelaChesnaye, F.C., Gardiner, A., Bates, J., Sankovski, A., 2006, 'Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from waste, energy and industry', Energy Journal 27 (Special Issue), 45-62.
6. den Elzen, M.G.J., Höhne, N., Lucas, P.L., Moltman, S., Kuramochi, T., 2008a, The Triptych Approach Revisited: A Staged Sectoral Approach for Climate Mitigation, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
7. den Elzen, M.G.J., Höhne, N., Moltman, S., 2008b, 'The Triptych approach revisited: a staged sectoral approach for climate mitigation', Energy Policy 36, 1107-1124.
8. EC (European Commission), 2006, World Energy Technology Outlook 2050 (WETO H2), Brussels.
9. Ekholm, T., Soimakallio, S., Moltmann, S., Höhne, N., Syri, S., Savolainen, I., 2010, 'Effort sharing in ambitious, global climate change mitigation scenarios', Energy Policy 38, 1797-1810.
10. 2 Greenhouse Gases, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
11. Fisher, B., Nakicenovic, N., et al., 2007, 'Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context', in: B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds), Climate Change 2007: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, 169-250.
12. Graus, W., Harmelink, M., Hendriks, C., 2004, Marginal GHG-Abatement Curves for Agriculture, Ecofys, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
13. Groenenberg, H., van der Sluijs, J.P., 2005, 'Valueloading and uncertainty in a sector-based differentiation scheme for emission allowances', Climatic Change 71, 75-115.
14. Groenenberg, H., Phylipsen, D., Blok, K., 2001, 'Differentiating commitments world wide: global differentiation of GHG emissions reductions based on the Triptych approach - a preliminary assessment', Energy Policy 29, 1007-1030.
15. Groenenberg, H., Blok, K., van der Sluijs, J.P., 2004, 'Global Triptych: a bottom-up approach for the differentiation of commitments under the Climate Convention', Climate Policy 4, 153-175.
16. Gupta, S., Tirpak, D.A., Burger, N., Gupta, J., Höhne, N., Boncheva, A.I., Kanoan, G.M., Kolstad, C., Kruger, J.A., Michaelowa, A., Murase, S., Pershing, J., Saijo, T., Sari, A., 2007, 'Policies, instruments and co-operative arrangements', in: B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds), Climate Change 2007: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, 745-807.
17. Höhne, N., Phylipsen, D., Ullrich, S., Blok, K., 2005, Options for the Second Commitment Period of the Kyoto Protocol, Research Report for the German Federal Environmental Agency, Climate Change 02.05, Ecofys, Cologne, Germany [available at www.fiacc.net/data/Climate_Change_02.05.pdf].
18. Höhne, N., Phylipsen, D., Moltman, S., 2007, Factors Underpinning Future Action: 2007 Update, Ecofys, Cologne, Germany.
19. Höhne, N., Worrell, E., Ellerman, C., Vieweg, M., Hagemann, M., 2008, 'Sectoral approach and development', Input paper for the workshop Where Development Meets Climate: Development Related Mitigation Options for a Global Climate Change Agreement, Ecofys, Cologne, Germany [available at http://www.pbl.nl/images/sectoral%20approach%20and%20development%20final_tcm61-40487.pdf].
20. 2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 1971-2003: 2005 Edition, Paris.
21. Kindermann, G., Obersteiner, M., Sohngen, B., Sathaye, J., Andrasko, K., Rametsteiner, E., Schlamadinger, B., Wunder, S., Beach, R., 2008, 'Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105, 10302-10307.
22. 2 greenhouse gases', Environmental Science and Policy 10, 85-103.
23. 2 emissions', in: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center ORNL, US Department of Energy (ed), Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, CDIAC, Oak Ridge, TN.
24. Olivier, J.G.J., van Aardenne, J.A., 2007, 'EDGAR and UNFCCC greenhouse gas datasets: comparisons as indicator of accuracy', in: P. Bergamaschi (ed), Atmospheric Monitoring and Inverse Modelling for Verification of National and EU and National and EU Bottom-up GHG Inventories, Joint Research Center and European Commission, 87-90.
25. Olivier, J.G.J., van Aardenne, J.A., Dentener, F., Pagliari, V., Ganzeveld, L.N., Peters, J.A.H.W., 2005, 'Recent trends in global greenhouse gas emissions: regional trends and spatial distribution of key sources', Environmental Sciences 2, 81-100.
26. Ott, H.E., Winkler, H., Brouns, B., Kartha, S., Mace, M., Huq, S., Kameyama, Y., Sari, A.P., Pan, J., Sokona, Y., Bhandari, P.M., Kassenberg, A., La Rovere, E.L., Rahman, A., 2004, South-North Dialogue on Equity in the Greenhouse: A Proposal for an Adequate and Equitable Global Climate Agreement, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit.
27. Phylipsen, G.J.M., Bode, J.W., Blok, K., Merkus, H., Metz, B., 1998, 'A Triptych sectoral approach to burden differentiation: GHG emissions in the European bubble', Energy Policy 26, 929-943.
28. Phylipsen, D., Höhne, N., Janzic, R., 2004, Implementing Triptych 6.0: Technical Report, Ecofys, DM 70046/ICC03080, Utrecht, The Netherlands
29. Reis, S., Pfeiffer, H., Theloke, J., Scholz, Y., 2008, 'Temporal and spatial distribution of carbon emissions', in: A.J. Dolman, R. Valentini, A. Freibauer (eds), The Continental-Scale Greenhouse Gas Balance of Europe, Springer-Verlag, New York, 73-90.
30. Saikku, L., Soimakallio, S., 2008, 'Top-down approaches for sharing GHG emission reductions: uncertainties and sensitivities in the European Union Member States', Environmental Science and Policy 11, 723-734.
31. Schmidt, J., Helme, N., Lee, J., Houdashelt, M., 2008, 'Sector-based approach to the post-2012 climate change policy architecture', Climate Policy 8, 494-515.
32. Soimakallio, S., Perrels, A., Honkatukia, J., Moltmann, S., Höhne, N., 2006, Analysis and Evaluation of Triptych 6: Case Finland, VTT Working Paper 48, Espoo, Finland.
33. UN (United Nations), 2005, World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations, New York.
34. UNFCCC, 2007, Synthesis of Information Relevant to the Determination of the Mitigation Potential and to the Identification of Possible Ranges of Emission Reduction Objectives of Annex I Parties, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/TP/2007/1.
35. van Vuuren, D.P., Lucas, P.L., Hilderink, H., 2007, 'Downscaling drivers of global environmental change scenarios: enabling use of the IPCC SRES scenarios at the national and grid level', Global Environmental Change 17, 114-130.
36. van Vuuren, D., Isaac, M., Kundzewicz, Z., 2010, 'Scenarios as the basis for assessment of mitigation and adaptation', in: M. Hulme, H. Neufeldt (eds), Making Climate Change Work for Us: European Perspectives on Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 54-86.