Effect of vanadium-based selective catalytic reduction catalysts on mercury speciation transformation

Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science)

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1773-1780

  He, Sheng ^a   Zhou, Jin Song ^a   Zhu, Yan Qun ^a   Luo, Zhong Yang ^a   Ni, Ming Jiang ^a   Cen, Ke Fa ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Flue gas; Mercury; Oxidation; SCR catalyst; Speciation transformation

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE COMPONENTS; ACTIVE SITE; CATALYST SURFACES; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; FLUE GAS COMPONENT; HIGHER TEMPERATURES; IMPREGNATION METHODS; LARGE SPACES; MERCURY; MERCURY OXIDATIONS; MERCURY SPECIATIONS; REACTION TEMPERATURE; SCR CATALYSTS; SCR REACTORS; SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION CATALYSTS; SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION SYSTEMS; SPACE VELOCITIES; SPECIATION TRANSFORMATION; TEST CONDITION; TIO; VANADIA;

CATALYST ACTIVITY; COAL; FLUE GASES; FLUES; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; LAKES; MERCURY (METAL); OXIDATION; VANADIUM; VANADIUM ALLOYS;

SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION;

EID: 78149488990     PISSN: 1008973X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2010.09.023     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Mercury Study Report to Congress [R]. Washington, DC, U S: Government Printing Office, 1997.
2. Laudal D L, Heidt M K, Nott B R, et al. Evaluation of flue gas mercury speciation methods. Final Report [R]. Palo Alto: Electric Power Research Institute/U.S. Department of Energy, 1997.
3. Price D, Birnbaum R, Batiuk R, et al. Impacts on Public Health and the Environment [R]. Washington, DC, US: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, 1997.
4. Lee C W, Srivastava R K, Ghorishi S B, et al. Pilot-scale study of the effect of selective catalytic reduction catalyst on mercury speciation in Illinois and Powder River Basin coal combustion flue gases [J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2006, 56(5): 643-649.
5. x on Mercury Speciation [R]. Palo Alto, cA, US: Electric Power Research Institute, 2000.
6. Kilgroe J D, Sedman C B, Srivastava Ryan J V, et al. Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Utility Boilers [R]. Washington, DC, US: Environmental Protection Agency, 2002.
7. Machalek T, Ramavajjala M, Richardson M, et al. Pilot Evaluation of Flue Gas Mercury Reactions Across an SCR Unit [C]//Proceedings of the Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Symposium-The Mega Symposium. Washington DC: [s.n.], 2003.
8. Gretta W, Morita I, Moffett J. Mercury oxidation across SCR catalyst at LG&E's trimble county unit [C]//Proceedings of Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium. Baltimore, MD: [s.n.], 2006.
9. x on Mercury Speciation [R]. Grand Forks, ND: Energy & Environmental Research Center, 2001.
10. Carey T. Effect of mercury speciation on removal across wet FGD processes [C]//Proceeding of the AWMA 92nd Annual Meeting. St. Louis, MO: AWMA, 1999.
11. Presto A, Granite E. Survey of catalysts for oxidation of mercury in flue gas [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 40(18): 5601-5609.
12. Wachs I E. Raman and IR studies of surface metal oxide species on oxide supports: Supported metal oxide catalysts [J]. Catalysis Today, 1996, 27(3/4): 437-455.
13. Bachmann H, Ahmed F, Barnes W, et al. The crystal structure of vanadium pentoxide [J]. Zeitschrift Für Kristallographie, 1961, 115(2): 110-131.
14. Kamata K, Mouri S, Ueno S, et al. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis [M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007.
15. Galbreath K C, Zygarlicke C J. Mercury speciation in coal combustion and gasification flue gases [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1996, 30(8): 2421-2426.
16. 2 catalyst [J]. Catalysis Communication, 2008, 9(14): 2441-2444.
17. Niksa S, Fujiwara N. A predictive mechanism for mercury oxidation on selective catalytic reduction catalysts under coal-derived flue gas [J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2005, 55(12): 1866-1875.
18. x emission control conditions [J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2004, 54(12): 1560-1566.
19. Liger R N, Kramlich J C, Marinov N M. Towards the development of a chemical kinetic model for the homogeneous oxidation of mercury by chlorine species [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000, 65-66: 423-438.
20. Pan H, Minet R, Benson S, et al. Process for converting hydrogen chloride to chlorine [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1994, 33(12): 2996-3003.
21. Niksa S, Fujiwara N, Fujita Y, et al. A mechanism for mercury oxidation in coal-derived exhausts [J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2002, 52(8): 894-901.
22. Hisham M, Benson S. Thermochemistry of the Deacon Process [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1995, 99(16): 6194-6198.
23. 2004: 99-107.
24. 3 over honeycomb DeNOxing catalysts [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1993, 32(5): 826-834.
25. Galbreath K, Zygarlicke C. Mercury transformations in coal combustion flue gases [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000, 65-66: 289-310.
26. Eswaran S, Stenger G. Understanding mercury conversion in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2005, 19(6): 2328-2834.
27. 5 catalysts [J]. Applied Catalysis A, 1993, 96(2): 365-381.
28. Ramis G, Busca G, Bregani F, et al. Fourier transform-infrared study of the adsorption and coadsorption of nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide and ammonia on vanadia-titania and mechanism of selective catalytic reduction [J]. Applied Catalysis, 1990, 64(1/2): 259-278.
29. Janssen F, Van Den Kerkhof F, Bosch H, et al. Mechanism of the reaction of nitric oxide, ammonia, and oxygen over vanadia catalysts. 1. The role of oxygen studied by way of isotopic transients under dilute condition [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1987, 91(23): 5921-5927.
30. Topsoe N Y, Dumesic J A, Topsoe H. Vanadia/Titania catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide by ammonia. II. Studies of active sites and formulation of catalytic cycles [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1995, 151(1): 241-252.