Will the Australian curriculum up the intellectual ante in primary classrooms?

Curriculum Perspectives

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 59-65

  Luke, Allan ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149488645     PISSN: 01597868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Apple, M. (1978). Ideology and Curriculum. New York: Routledge.
2. Brayboy, B. & Castagno, A. (2009). Self-determination through self-education: Culturally responsive schooling for Indigenous students in the USA. Teaching Education, 20, pp. 31-53.
3. Cohen, D. & Hill, H. (2001). Learning Policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
4. Green, B., Hodgens, J. & Luke, A. (1997). Debating 'literacy' in Australia: History lessons and popular f(r)ictions. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 20(1), pp. 6-25.
5. Hattie, J. (2010). Visible Learning. New York: Routledge.
6. Hopmann, S.T., Brinek, G. & Retzl, M. (Eds) (2007). PISA According to PISA: Does PISA Keep What It Promises? Vienna: LIT-Verlag.
7. Ladwig, J. (2007). Modelling pedagogy in Australian school reform. Pedagogies, 2, pp. 57-76.
8. Ladwig, J.G. & Gore, J.M. (2005). Measuring teacher quality and student achievement. Professional Educator, 4(2), pp. 26-29.
9. Lee, J. (2006). Tracking Achievement Gaps and Assessing the Impact of NCLB on the Gaps: An in-depth look into national and state reading and maths outcome trends. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Civil Rights Project.
10. Lingard, R., Ladwig, J., Mills, M., Hayes, D., Christie, P., Ailwood, J., Warry, M., Gore, J. & Luke, A. (2001). Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study: Final Report. Brisbane: Education Queensland.
11. Luke, A., Dooley, K. & Woods, A. (in press, 2010). Comprehension and content: Planning literacy curriculum in low socioeconomic and culturally diverse schools. Australian Educational Researcher.
12. Luke, A., Grieshaber, S., Shield, P. & MacDonald, S. (2009). Literacy and social class in year one: A descriptive picture. Paper presented at the Futures of Literacy Conference, University of Sydney, 9/09.
13. Luke, A. & Woods, A. (2009). Policy and adolescent literacy, in L. Christenbury, R. Bomer & P. Smagorinsky (Eds), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 197-219). New York & London: The Guilford Press.
14. McGaw, B. (2010). Reducing the impact of social background in education: Fond hope or realistic aim? Murdoch Lecture, Perth, 17 March 2010. Retrieved 20 May 2010 from http://www.education.murdoch.edu.au/pdf_files/McGaw%20-%20Murdoch%20lecture.pdf
15. Newmann, F.M. and Associates (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring school for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Nichols, S. & Berliner, D. (2006). Collateral damage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
17. Nichols, S., Glass, G. & Berliner, D. (2005). High stakes testing and student achievement: Problems for the No Child Left Behind Act. Tempe, AZ: Educational Policy Research Unit.
18. Nixon, H., Comber, B. & Kerin, R. (2009). Investigating literacy years 4-9: A pilot. Adelaide: Department of Education and Children's Services.
19. OECD (2007). PISA 2006. Paris: CERI/OECD.
20. Paris, S. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 2, pp. 184-202.
21. Ravich, D. (2010). The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education. New York: Basic Books.
22. Resnick, L.B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39, pp. 183-197.
23. Schleicher, A. (in press, 2010,). Seeing school systems through the prism of PISA, in A. Luke, A. Woods, K. & Weir (Eds), Curriculum, Syllabus Design and Equity. New York: Routledge.