Long-term use of custom-made orthopedic shoes: 1.5-year follow-up study

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 643-649

  van Netten, Jaap J ^a,b   Jannink, Michiel J A ^c,d   Hijmans, Juha M ^a,b   Geertzen, Jan H B ^a,b   Postema, Klaas ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c ROESSINGH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Foot disorders; Long term use; Medical devices; Orthopedic shoes; Orthotics; Patient satisfaction; Rehabilitation; Shoes; Usability; Usability outcomes

Indexed keywords

FOOT DISORDERS; LONG-TERM USE; MEDICAL DEVICES; ORTHOPEDIC SHOES; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REHABILITATION; SHOES; USABILITY; USABILITY OUTCOMES;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; ORTHOPEDICS; ORTHOTICS; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FOOT MALFORMATION; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC SHOE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FOOT DISEASES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SHOES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING;

EID: 78149478396     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2010.03.0040     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Postema K, Toornend JL, Zilvold G, Schaars AH. [Custom made orthopaedic shoes in the medical practice]. Houten/ Antwerpen (the Netherlands): Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum; 1991. Dutch.
2. Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales. Fully equipped: The provision to older people or disabled people by the NHS and social services in England and Wales. London (UK): Audit Commission; 2000.
3. GIP, College voor Zorgverzekeringen Monitor medische hulpmiddelen [Internet]. [updated 2006 Jun 22; cited 2007 Oct 24]. Available from: http://www.cvz.nl/binaries/live/ CVZ Internet/hst content/nl/documenten/rapporten/2006/ rpt0606+monitor+hulpmiddelen.pdf/ Dutch.
4. Van Netten JJ, Jannink MJ, Hijmans JM, Geertzen JH, Postema K. Use and usability of custom-made orthopedic shoes. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(1):73-82. [PMID: 20437329] DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2009.08.0142
5. Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Scherer MJ, DeRuyter F. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(22):1243-1251. [PMID: 14617441] DOI:10.1080/09638280310001596207
6. Riemer-Reiss ML, Wacker RR. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil. 2000;66(3):44-50.
7. Demers L, Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Scherer MJ, Pervieux I, DeRuyter F. Tracking mobility-related assistive technology in an outcomes study. Assist Technol. 2008;20(2):73-83. [PMID: 18646430]
8. Fisher LR McLellan DL. Questionnaire assessment of patient satisfaction with lower limb orthoses from a district hospital. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1989;13(1):29-35. [PMID: 2717382]
9. Jannink MJ, Ijzerman MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K, Stewart RE, Groothoff JW, Lankhorst GJ. Use of orthopedic shoes in patients with degenerative disorders of the foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(4):687-92. [PMID: 15827918 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.06.069
10. Philipsen AB, Ellitsgaard N, Krogsgaard MR, Sonne-Holm S. Patient compliance and effect of orthopaedic shoes. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1999;23(1):59-62. [PMID: 10355645]
11. Williams A, Meacher K. Shoes in the cupboard: The fate of prescribed footwear? Prosthet Orthot Int. 2001;25(1):53-59. [PMID: 11411006] DOI:10.1080/03093640108726569
12. Van Netten JJ, Hijmans JM, Jannink MJ, Geertzen JH, Postema K. Development and reproducibility of a short questionnaire to measure use and usability of custom-made orthopaedic shoes. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(11):913-918. [PMID: 19841843] DOI:10.2340/16501977-0447
13. Lenker JA, Scherer MJ, Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, DeRuyter F. Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology device outcomes research. Assist Technol. 2005;17(1):7-22. [PMID: 16121642]
14. Wessels R, Dijcks B, Soede M, Gelderblom GJ, De Witte LP. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Technol Disabil. 2003;15:231-38.
15. Field AP. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London (UK): Sage; 2009.
16. Dijcks BP, De Witte LP, Gelderblom GJ, Wessels RD, Soede M. Non-use of assistive technology in the Netherlands: A non-issue? Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006; 1(1-2):97-102. [PMID: 19256172] DOI:10.1080/09638280500167548
17. Johnson M, Newton P, Jiwa M, Goyder E. Meeting the educational needs of people at risk of diabetes-related amputation: A vignette study with patients and professionals. Health Expect. 2005;8(4):324-333. [PMID: 16266420] DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00344.x
18. Johnson M, Newton P, Goyder E. Patient and professional perspectives on prescribed therapeutic footwear for people with diabetes: A vignette study. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 64(1-3):167-172. [PMID: 16469472] DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2005.12.013
19. Williams AE, Nester CJ, Ravey MI. Rheumatoid arthritis patients' experiences of wearing therapeutic footwear-A qualitative investigation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007; 8:104. [PMID: 17976235] DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-8-104