Adhesions and chronic pelvic pain;Adhérences et douleurs pelvipérinéales chroniques

Progres en Urologie

Volumn 20, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1003-1009

  Roman, H ^a   Bourdel, N ^b   Canis, M ^b   Rigaud, J ^c   Delavierre, D ^d   Labat, J J ^c   Sibert, L ^e  

^a ROUEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

^c NANTES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d CENTRE HOSPITALIER RÉGIONAL D ORLÉANS   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE ROUEN   (France)

Author keywords

Adhesiolysis; Adhesions; Chronic pelvic pain

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC DISEASE; HUMAN; PELVIS PAIN SYNDROME; SHORT SURVEY; TISSUE ADHESION;

CHRONIC DISEASE; HUMANS; PELVIC PAIN; TISSUE ADHESIONS;

EID: 78149477860     PISSN: 11667087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2010.08.003     Document Type: Short Survey

References (45)

1. Duron J.J. Postoperative intraperitoneal adhesion pathophysiology. Colorectal Dis 2007, 9(Suppl. 2):14-24.
2. Albanese A.M., Albanese E.F., Miño J.H., Gómez E., Gómez M., Zandomeni M., et al. Peritoneal surface area: measurements of 40 structures covered by peritoneum: correlation between total peritoneal surface area and the surface calculated by formulas. Surg Radiol Anat 2009, 31:369-377.
3. Michailova K.N., Usunoff K.G. Serosal membranes (pleura, pericardium, peritoneum). Normal structure, development and experimental pathology. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 2006, 183(i-vii):1-144. [back cover].
4. Canis M., Matsuzaki S., Bourdel N., Jardon K., Cotte B., Botchorishvili R., et al. Péritoine et environement cœlioscopique. Bull Cancer 2007, 94(12):1043-1051.
5. Canis M., Botchorishvili R., Rabischong B., Houlle C., Wattiez A., Mage G., et al. Péritoine. EMC Gynecol 2002, [1075-A-10].
6. Baakdah H., Tulandi T. Adhesion in gynecology. Complication, cost, and prevention. A review. Surg Technol Int 2005, 14:185-190.
7. Ott D.E. Laparoscopy and adhesion formation, adhesions and laparoscopy. Semin Reprod Med 2008, 26:322-330.
8. Diamond M.P., Freeman M.L. Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions. Hum Reprod Update 2001, 7:567-576.
9. Diamond M.P., Daniell J.F., Feste J., et al. Adhesion reformation and de novo adhesion formation after reproductive pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril 1987, 47:864-866.
10. Davey A.K., Maher P.J. Surgical adhesions: a timely update, a great challenge for the future. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007, 14:15-22.
11. Ivarsson M.L., Bergström M., Eriksson E., Risberg B., Holmdahl L. Tissue markers as predictors of postoperative adhesions. Br J Surg 1998, 85:1549-1554.
12. Hellebrekers B.W., Trimbos-Kemper T.C., Boesten L., Jansen F.W., Kolkman W., Trimbos J.B., et al. Preoperative predictors of postsurgical adhesion formation and the Prevention of Adhesions with Plasminogen Activator (PAPA-study): results of a clinical pilot study. Fertil Steril 2009, 91:1204-1214.
13. DeWilde R.L., Trew G. Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery. Expert consensus position. Part 2 - steps to reduce adhesions. Gynecol Surg 2007, 10.1007/s10397-007-0338-x.
14. Molinas C.R., Koninckx P.R. Hypoxaemia induced by CO2 or helium pneumoperitoneum is a co-factor in adhesion formation in rabbits. Hum Reprod 2000, 15:1758-1763.
15. Matsuzaki S., Canis M., Bazin J.E., Darcha C., Pouly J.L., Mage G. effects of supplemental perioperative oxygen on post-operative abdominal wound adhesions in a mouse laparotomy model with controlled respiratory support. Hum Reprod 2007, 10:2702-2706.
16. Ray N.F., Denton W.G., Thamer M., Henderson S.C., Perry S. Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg 1998, 186:1-9.
17. Menzies D., Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions-how big is the problem?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990, 72:60-63.
18. Howard F.M. The role of laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain: promise and pitfalls. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1993, 48:357-387.
19. Sulaiman H., Gabella G., Davis C., et al. Presence and distribution of sensory nerve fibers in human peritoneal adhesions. Ann Surg 2001, 234:256-261.
20. Sibert L., Safsaf A., Rigaud J., Delavierre D., Labat J.J. Approches symptomatiques des douleurs sexuelles chroniques. Prog Urol 2010, 20:967-972.
21. Rapkin A.J. Adhesions and pelvic pain: a retrospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1986, 68:13-15.
22. Thornton J.G., Morley S., Lilleyman J., Onwude J.L., Currie I., Crompton A.C. The relationship between laparoscopic disease, pelvic pain and infertility; an unbiased assessment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997, 74:57-62.
23. Keltz M.D., Peck L., Liu S., Kim A.H., Arici A., Olive D.L. Large bowel-to-pelvic sidewall adhesions associated with chronic pelvic pain. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995, 3:55-59.
24. Keltz M.D., Gera P.S., Olive D.L. Prospective randomized trial of right-sided paracolic adhesiolysis for chronic pelvic pain. JSLS 2006, 10:443-446.
25. Parker M.C., Wilson M.S., Menzies D., Sunderland G., Clark D.N., Knight A.D., et al. Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research (SCAR) Group The SCAR-3 study: 5-year adhesion-related readmission risk following lower abdominal surgical procedures. Colorectal Dis 2005, 7:551-558.
26. Wilson M.S., Menzies D., Knight A.D., Crowe A.M. Demonstrating the clinical and cost effectiveness of adhesion reduction strategies. Colorectal Dis 2002, 4:355-360.
27. Freys S.M., Fuchs K.H., Heimbucher J., Thiede A. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Surg Endosc 1994, 8:1202-1207.
28. Kodama I., Loiacono L.A., Sigel B., Machi J., Golub R.M., Parsons R.E., et al. Ultrasonic detection of viscera slide as an indicator of abdominal wall adhesions. J Clin Ultrasound 1992, 20:375-380.
29. Lang R.A., Buhmann S., Hopman A., Steitz H.O., Lienemann A., Reiser M.F., et al. Cine-MRI detection of intraabdominal adhesions: correlation with intraoperative findings in 89 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2008, 22:2455-2461.
30. Buhmann-Kirchhoff S., Lang R., Kirchhoff C., Steitz H.O., Jauch K.W., Reiser M., et al. Functional cine MR imaging for the detection and mapping of intraabdominal adhesions: method and surgical correlation. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:1215-1223.
31. Chan C.L., Wood C. Pelvic adhesiolysis-the assessment of symptom relief by 100 patients. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1985, 25:295-298.
32. Swank D.J., Van Erp W.F., Repelaer Van Driel O.J., Hop W.C., Bonjer H.J., Jeekel H. A prospective analysis of predictive factors on the results of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003, 13:88-94.
33. Szomstein S. Lo Menzo E, Simpfendorfer C, Zundel N. Rosenthal RJ. Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. World J Surg 2006, 30:535-540.
34. Sato Y., Ido K., Kumagai M., Isoda N., Hozumi M., Nagamine N., et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction: long-term follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 54:476-479.
35. Khaitan L., Scholz S., Houston H.L., Richards W.O. Results after laparoscopic lysis of adhesions and placement of seprafilm for intractable abdominal pain. Surg Endosc 2003, 17:247-253.
36. Swank D.J., Swank-Bordewijk S.C.G. Hop WCJ, van Erp WFM, Janssen IMC. Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomized controlled multi-centre trial. Lancet 2003, 361:1247-1251.
37. Brown C.B., Luciano A.A., Martin D., Peers E., Scrimgeour A., diZerega G.S., et al. Adept (icodextrin 4 % solution) reduces adhesions after laparoscopic surgery for adhesiolysis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril 2007, 88:1413-1426.
38. Mais V., Ajossa S., Marongiu D., Peiretti R.F., Guerriero S., Melis G.B. Reduction of adhesion reformation after laparoscopic endometriosis surgery: a randomized trial with an oxidized regenerated cellulose absorbable barrier. Obstet Gynecol 1995, 86:512-515.
39. The efficacy of Interceed (TC7) for prevention of reformation of postoperative adhesions on ovaries, fallopian tubes, and fimbriae in microsurgical operations for fertility: a multicenter study. Fertil Steril 1995, 63:709-714. Nordic Adhesion Prevention Study Group.
40. Sekiba K. Use of Interceed (TC7) absorbable adhesion barrier to reduce postoperative adhesion reformation in infertility and endometriosis surgery. The Obstetrics and Gynecology Adhesion Prevention Committee. Obstet Gynecol 1992, 79:518-522.
41. Beck D.E., Cohen Z., Fleshman J.W., Kaufman H.S., van Goor H., Wolff B.G., et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 2003, 46:1310-1319.
42. Fazio V.W., Cohen Z., Fleshman J.W., van Goor H., Bauer J.J., Wolff B.G., et al. Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2006, 49:1-11.
43. Diamond M.P. Reduction of adhesions after uterine myomectomy by Seprafilm membrane (HAL-F): a blinded, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study. Seprafilm Adhesion Study Group. Fertil Steril 1996, 66:904-910.
44. Benifla J.L. Preliminary results of a comparative randomized study in adhesion prevention: second-look evaluation shows significant results of Prevadh adhesion barrier. 8th PAX Meeting Clermont-Ferrand 2008.
45. Roman H., Hulsey T.F., Marpeau L., Hulsey T.C. Why laparoscopic adhesiolysis should not be the victim of a single randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009, 200:136. [e1-4].