Assessing the effect of scale on the ability of landscape structure metrics to discriminate landscape types in Mediterranean forest districts;Evaluación del efecto de la escala en la capacidad de los índices de estructura del paisaje para discriminar tipos de paisaje en comarcas forestales mediterráneas

Investigacion Agraria Sistemas y Recursos Forestales

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 129-140

  Garcia Feced C ^a   Saura, S ^a   Elena Rossello R ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Forest planning; Grain size; Metric correlation; Minimum mapped unit; Spatial resolution; Variability analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149468419     PISSN: 11317965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. BALDWIN D.J.B., WEAVER K., SCHNEKENBURGER F., PERERA A.H., 2004. Sensitivity of landscape pattern indices to input data characteristics on real landscapes: implications for their use in natural disturbance emulation. Landsc Ecol 19, 255-271.
2. BASKENT E.Z., JORDAN G.A., 1995. Characterizing spatial structure of forest landscapes. Can J For Res 25, 1830-1849.
3. BOGAERT J., MYNENI R.B., KNYAZIKHIN Y., 2002. A mathematical comment on the formulae for the aggregation index and the shape index. Landsc Ecol 17, 87-90.
4. BUYANTUYEV A., WU J., 2007. Effects of thematic resolution on landscape pattern analysis. Landsc Ecol 22, 7-13.
5. CAIN D.H., RIITTERS K.H., ORVIS K., 1997. A multi-scale analysis of landscape statistics. Ecology 12, 199-212.
6. CORRY R.C., LAFORTEZZA R., 2006. Sensitivity of landscape measurement to changing grain size for fine-scale data representing highly-fragmented landscapes. Landsc Ecol Eng 3, 47-53.
7. DE CLERCQ E.M., DE WULF R.R., VAN HERZELE A., 2007. Relating spatial pattern of forest cover to accessibility. Landsc Urban Plan 80, 14-22.
8. DÍAZ-VARELA E.R., MAREY-PÉREZ M.F., RIGUEIRORODRÍGUEZ A., ÁLVAREZ-ÁLVAREZ P., 2009. Landscape metrics for characterization of forest landscapes in a sustainable management framework: potential application and prevention of misuse. Ann For Sci 66, 301.
9. ELKIE P., REMPEL R., CARR A., 1999. Patch analyst user's manual. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Northwest Sci & Technol. Thunder Bay, Ont. TM-002. 16 pp. + Append.
10. FARINA A., 2006. Principles and methods in landscape ecology. Towards a science of landscape. Springer, The Netherlands. 414 pp.
11. FORMAN R.T.T., GODRON M., 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 619 pp.
12. FROHN R., HAO Y., 2006. Landscape metric performance in analysing two decades of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon Basin of Rondonia, Brazil. Remote Sens Environ 100, 237-251.
13. GARCÍA D., QUEVEDO M., OBESO J.R., ABAJO A., 2005. Fragmentation patterns and protection of montane forests in the Cantabrian range (NW Spain). For Ecol Manage 208, 29-43.
14. GARCÍA-FECED C., GONZÁLEZ-ÁVILA S., ELENAROSSELLÓ R., 2008. Metodología para la tipificación y caracterización estructural de paisajes en comarcas forestales españolas. Invest Agrar: Sist Recur For 17, 130-142. [In Spanish].
15. GÄRTNER S., REYNOLDS K.M., HESSBURG P.F., HUMMEL S., TWERY M., 2008. Decision support for evaluating landscape departure and prioritizing forest management activities in a changing environment. For Ecol Manage 256, 1666-1676.
16. GUSTAFSON E.J., 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1, 143-156.
17. HAINES-YOUNG R., CHOPPING M., 1996. Quantifying landscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes. Prog Phys Geogr 20, 418-445.
18. HARGIS C.D., BISSONETTE J.A., DAVID J.L., 1998. The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 13, 167-186.
19. HE H.S., DEZONIA B.E., MLADENOFF D.J., 2000. An aggregation index (AI) to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landsc Ecol 15, 591-601
20. LAUSCH A., HERZOG F., 2002. Applicability of landscape metrics for monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability. Ecol Indic 2, 3-15.
21. LEITAO A.B., AHERN J., 2002. Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59, 65-93.
22. LEITAO A.B., MILLER J., AHERN J., MCGARIGAL K., 2006. Measuring Landscapes. A planner's handbook. Island Press, Washington (USA). 248 pp.
23. LI H., WU J., 2004. Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landsc Ecol 19, 389-399.
24. MCGARIGAL K., MARKS B.J., 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep,PNW-351. 122 pp.
25. MINISTERIO DE MEDIO AMBIENTE, 2002a. Mapa forestal de España escala 1:50000. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad, Madrid. [CD-ROM] [In Spanish]
26. MINISTERIO DE MEDIO AMBIENTE, 2002b. Tercer Inventario Forestal Nacional, Soria. [In Spanish].
27. PENG J., WANG Y., ZHANG Y., WU J., LI W., LI Y., 2010. Evaluating the effectiveness of landscape metrics in quantifying spatial patterns. Ecol Indic 10, 217-223.
28. PERERA A.H., BUSE L.J., CROW T.R. (eds), 2006. Forest landscape ecology. Transferring knowledge to practice. Springer, New York. 223 pp.
29. RIITTERS K.H., O'NEILL R.V., HUNSAKER C.T., WICKHAM J.D., YANKEE D.H., TIMMINS S.P., JONES K.B., JACKSON B.L., 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landsc Ecol 10, 23-40.
30. SAURA S., 2004. Effects of remote sensor spatial resolution and data aggregation on selected fragmentation indices. Landsc Ecol 19, 197-209.
31. SAURA S., CARBALLAL P., 2004. Discrimination of native and exotic forest patterns through shape irregularity indi- ces: an analysis in the landscapes of Galicia, Spain. Landsc Ecol 19, 647-662.
32. SAURA S., CASTRO S., 2007. Scaling functions for landscape pattern metrics derived from remotely sensed data: are their subpixel estimates really accurate? ISPRS-J Photogramm Remote Sens 62, 201-216.
33. SAURA S., TORRAS O., GIL-TENA., PASCUAL L., 2008. Shape irregularity as an indicator of forest biodiversity and guidelines for metric selection. In: Patterns and processes in forest landscapes: multiple use and sustainable management (Lafortezza R., Chen J., Sanesi G. et al., eds). Springer. pp. 167-189.
34. SPSS INC., 2008. SPSS for Windows, Rel. 17.0. Chicago.
35. TANG S.M., GUSTAFSON E.J., 1997. Perception of scale in forest management planning: Challenges and implications. Landsc Urban Plan 39, 1-9.
36. TISCHENDORF L., 2001. Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently? Landsc Ecol 16, 235-254.
37. TORRAS O., MARTIN-QUELLER E., SAURA S., 2009. Relating landscape structure, environment and management to forest biodiversity indicators in Mediterranean landscapes. Invest Agrar: Sist Recur For 18, 322-337.
38. TRANI M.K., GILES R.H.JR., 1999. An analysis of deforestation: metrics used to describe pattern change. For Ecol Manage 114, 459-470.
39. TURNER M.G., DALE D.H., GARDNER R.H., 1989. Predicting across scales: theory development and testing. Landsc Ecol 3, 245-252.
40. TURNER M.G., GARDNER R., 1991. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. In: Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: an introduction. Springer-Verlag. pp. 3-14.
41. URBAN D.L., 2005. Modeling ecological processes across scales. Ecology 86, 1996-2006.
42. WEIERS S., BOCK M., WISSEN M., ROSSNER G., 2004. Mapping and indicator approaches for the assessment of habitats at different scales using remote sensing and GIS methods. Landsc Urban Plan 67, 43-65.
43. WICKHAM J.D., RIITTERS K.H., 1995. Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixel size. Int J Remote Sens 16, 3585-3595.
44. WU J., 2004. Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landsc Ecol 19, 125-138.
45. WU J., SHEN W., SUN W., TUELLER P.T., 2002. Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landsc Ecol 17, 761-782.